Official 2013 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Phloston

Phloston

Osaka, Japan
Removed
Lifetime Donor
Verified Member
10+ Year Member
Physician
Gold Donor
Joined
Jan 18, 2012
Messages
3,880
Reaction score
1,676
Members don't see this ad.
I figure now is a good time to jump-start this thread.

Even though some of us who had taken the exam in late-2012 are still awaiting our scores (amid the holiday delays) and could technically still post within last year's thread, it is after all mid-January now, so it's probably apposite that we move forward and hope for a great year.

:luck: Cheers to 2013 :luck:
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
Nesir said:
I posted in last years thread...I suppose I can put it in this one again.

___________________________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nesir
I took the exam yesterday, here are some thoughts:

1) A lot of the questions appear very difficult on the surface (I was asked why heparin is used when starting warfarin - but none of the answers were "because protein C has a short half life" but indirectly it was in one of the answers), but the concept is tied up in the one of the answers. I promise!

2) The anatomy is tricky. I think I had a total of about 15-20 anatomy questions total ranging from which lymph nodes does this cancer go to? To here is an MRI of a leg - identify this muscle. Know your brachial plexus, 3 of my questions were directly from lesions to the arm.

3) There was a lot of Pharm on my test - I would guess 10 per section. A lot of it was straight forward. Which is this drug? Some of it more difficult - here is a micro question what is the MOA of the drug used to treat it?

4) My microbiology was very interesting. I would say there were about 2 "what is its envelope / DNA structure type questions" a lot of them were "What is this?" Some of them were quite difficult and were not the traditional appearance but they always gave you enough information that if you understood the characteristics about the bug then you could determine the cause (only 2-3 really tricky ones total).

5) Physiology - you better know this inside and out. This, in my opinion, was where they really challenged you. They will give you a syndrome and ask what will happen to 3 of the variables (such as LH, FSH, Est for a woman) - and they will give you all 8 possibilities as answers. You really just need to know the answer can't really use process of elimination to help yourself there.

6) Heme / Onc REALLY STRAIGHT FORWARD everything was 100% text book case and they would ask "which chromosome" or for a renal cell CA I was asked "which Gene?"

7) Images - I think there were only 1/2 where I had to really look at the image to see what was happening. Most of the time the images were not necessary. For instance, a woman with heavy menstrual bleeding would have a picture of hypochromic anemia ----duuuuuuh. Or post transplant pneumonia....

8) Heart sounds - Absolutely cool. It was nice that they showed the carotid arteries move on every pulse (ie. systole no guessing which one is S1 or S2). I ended up taking this test at the end of my 3rd year and I can tell you - it was way easier on this test than in real life. 2nd - I had 3 and my friend had 4 and in the n=7 population, neither one of us needed the image. We had a diagnosis straight from the question stem.

9) When given a weird experiment that some scientist did make sure you take a second and ask yourself "what the eff are the asking?" Don't just jump straight to the data. I had 1/2 where the first time I read it I was thinking...the heck?!?!? But if you take an extra minute and really figure out what the test is looking at the answer just jumps out at you. Dont worry you will have time at the end to finish questions.

10) There will be questions that when you look at them you will think to yourself - yup no idea. There were some on my test that asked "which p450 isoenzyme is used for this" and the answers were "2d6,2d9,3a4, etc." Or here is a disease that I'm sure you have never seen before but none of the other ones make sense so I'm going to guess that. In the end, I really doubt those count significantly towards your score so dont freak out when you dont know the weird hormone elevation when a person has a strange disease.

Overall I think the HARDEST part of the test was endurance. Its an 8 hour test and there towards the end I could definitely feel my brain starting to rot. Make sure you save some break time for the end. And relax, the test is a lot easier than you think it is - most of the questions have simple answers written in strange ways. Don't freak out when the text book answer isn't there.

NBME 11: 6 weeks out 255
NBME 13: 4 weeks out 263

I took the test my school offered pre-studying 4 months out - and got a 186. I only studied for this test for dedicated full time for 7 weeks. I felt that was more than enough - way more than enough.
I'll post my score when I get it back. Feel free to PM me if you have any questions.


Just an update, REAL EXAM: 269/91

Pretty happy right now.
Click to expand...

Thanks for this
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Otherwise, I think pholston (and many others' plan) of doing the Intro sections of FA + pharm at the end of every pathophys section + embryo is an excellent plan of making sure u dont forget the minutae that more often presents itself in these chapters rather than higher level thinking
what is this method ,can anyone explain ???
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Hey guys,

Took my Step I on 7/18, but have not yet gotten the e-mail or a score on the NBME website. BUT, I saw that Aitzaz got his/her score and took it on the 24th? Does this seem strange? Has anyone had a similar experience?

(Also, I called NBME and they weren't very helpful but basically told me to just check next Wednesday)
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
thehealer said:
Hey guys,

Took my Step I on 7/18, but have not yet gotten the e-mail or a score on the NBME website. BUT, I saw that Aitzaz got his/her score and took it on the 24th? Does this seem strange? Has anyone had a similar experience?

(Also, I called NBME and they weren't very helpful but basically told me to just check next Wednesday)
Click to expand...

Where did you take the exam?

The 3 week timeline is a rule of thumb.. but sometimes it takes longer. Wouldn't get too worried yet. I know I've read of some people who said they got their scores late.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Read through a bunch of these during my freak-out Step 1 period... Hope this helps someone down the line

Studied for 5 weeks, did DIT in 3.5 weeks with a study partner...

Did one Uworld Qset 1st thing in the morning... went over answers, wrote down random facts in a notebook/annotated FA
listened to 9-12 lectures/day
Spent the evening going over/memorizing FA details on topics covered in DIT that day

Last 10days did 2problem sets/day, read FA, and reviewed my notebook of random facts... Started by reading FA sections I wasn't too comfortable with

Uworld: finished 90% of Qbank, started and ended with timed random sets... was in the 40s first week.... overall 69%, ranging between 76-85% last 16 sets

UWorld SA 1 : 247 day after finishing DIT (10 days before exam)

Exam experience:
Cried on my drive home....

I felt like I had guessed (and not educated guesses) 80% of my exam. it was nothing like what I expected. I had no time to review marked questions and barely finished on time for every section. stopped marking questions after 2nd set. By the last 2 sets I had given up and felt like I was randomly clicking answers just to finish. It was the worst feeling ever. I had many nightmares in the following weeks.... Was initially aiming for a 240... walked out almost positive I got something below 200 or failed... would have been happy/shocked to see anything close to 220....had started making plans for an alternate/backup career in my head 😀

Actual score: 240 😀

moral of the story: when people tell you you did better than you think you did, take their word for it!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
CaliAtenza said:
Is there any real difference between the 2nd and 3rd edition of the microcards??? Is it worth splurging for the 3rd edition?
Click to expand...

stronghold said:
I remember someone asked Phloston the same question. He replied that he used the second edition 🙂
Click to expand...

3rd edition has a few changes (kid in my PhD lab has the pack and I've looked through it), but they're not a big deal. 2nd edition is good.

Few discrepancies between Microcards and FA though:

Microcards mention delta virus as icosahedral but FA and literature --> helical.

Microcards mention arena virus as ss(-) non-segmented RNA virus, but FA says circular with two segments.

Microcards also list bunyavirus as ss(-) segmented, but FA mentions that it's circular with three segments.

That's all I can really think of right now, but apart from that, Microcards are solid.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Phloston said:
3rd edition has a few changes (kid in my PhD lab has the pack and I've looked through it), but they're not a big deal. 2nd edition is good.

Few discrepancies between Microcards and FA though:

Microcards mention delta virus as icosahedral but FA and literature --> helical.

Microcards mention arena virus as ss(-) non-segmented RNA virus, but FA says circular with two segments.

Microcards also list bunyavirus as ss(-) segmented, but FA mentions that it's circular with three segments.

That's all I can really think of right now, but apart from that, Microcards are solid.
Click to expand...

How's the Step 2 training coming along?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
For those of you that do UW in random blocks, does the computer generate an equal number of question from each subject (pharm, micro, etc.) r does it give you mostly path/pharm/micro questions since those are covered more on step 1?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Hemichordate said:
For those of you that do UW in random blocks, does the computer generate an equal number of question from each subject (pharm, micro, etc.) r does it give you mostly path/pharm/micro questions since those are covered more on step 1?
Click to expand...

I thought it was pretty spread out... and the component of each changed with each test..... just like the real exam.... but it's fairly spread -out and it seemed absolutely random.... I felt like some blocks, I had 4/5 behavioral sci/ethics question while in some blocks I just had one question on that subject..... so it seems completely random (while also spread out across all topics)
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Phloston said:
3rd edition has a few changes (kid in my PhD lab has the pack and I've looked through it), but they're not a big deal. 2nd edition is good.

Few discrepancies between Microcards and FA though:

Microcards mention delta virus as icosahedral but FA and literature --> helical.

Microcards mention arena virus as ss(-) non-segmented RNA virus, but FA says circular with two segments.

Microcards also list bunyavirus as ss(-) segmented, but FA mentions that it's circular with three segments.

That's all I can really think of right now, but apart from that, Microcards are solid.
Click to expand...

Thanks Pholston, im kinda freaking out now 🙁. Trying to be ready by the end of next month to take this exam...i feel like every day i forget what ive reviewed a few days ago...🙁.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
thawunandonly said:
Did you guys get e-mails the day before or something saying that you will get a score today (Wednesday)?

Anyway, please keep it updated, because I'm not sure if I'll get mine today.

Also, good luck!
Click to expand...

Took exam on the 27th, did not get a score today. Hopefully next Wednesday.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
DrSmday said:
Read through a bunch of these during my freak-out Step 1 period... Hope this helps someone down the line

Studied for 5 weeks, did DIT in 3.5 weeks with a study partner...

Did one Uworld Qset 1st thing in the morning... went over answers, wrote down random facts in a notebook/annotated FA
listened to 9-12 lectures/day
Spent the evening going over/memorizing FA details on topics covered in DIT that day

Last 10days did 2problem sets/day, read FA, and reviewed my notebook of random facts... Started by reading FA sections I wasn't too comfortable with

Uworld: finished 90% of Qbank, started and ended with timed random sets... was in the 40s first week.... overall 69%, ranging between 76-85% last 16 sets

UWorld SA 1 : 247 day after finishing DIT (10 days before exam)

Exam experience:
Cried on my drive home....

I felt like I had guessed (and not educated guesses) 80% of my exam. it was nothing like what I expected. I had no time to review marked questions and barely finished on time for every section. stopped marking questions after 2nd set. By the last 2 sets I had given up and felt like I was randomly clicking answers just to finish. It was the worst feeling ever. I had many nightmares in the following weeks.... Was initially aiming for a 240... walked out almost positive I got something below 200 or failed... would have been happy/shocked to see anything close to 220....had started making plans for an alternate/backup career in my head 😀

Actual score: 240 😀

moral of the story: when people tell you you did better than you think you did, take their word for it!
Click to expand...

congratulations!!

Truly appreciate the bolded analysis of your experience! 🙂
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
DrSmday said:
Read through a bunch of these during my freak-out Step 1 period... Hope this helps someone down the line

Studied for 5 weeks, did DIT in 3.5 weeks with a study partner...

Did one Uworld Qset 1st thing in the morning... went over answers, wrote down random facts in a notebook/annotated FA
listened to 9-12 lectures/day
Spent the evening going over/memorizing FA details on topics covered in DIT that day

Last 10days did 2problem sets/day, read FA, and reviewed my notebook of random facts... Started by reading FA sections I wasn't too comfortable with

Uworld: finished 90% of Qbank, started and ended with timed random sets... was in the 40s first week.... overall 69%, ranging between 76-85% last 16 sets

UWorld SA 1 : 247 day after finishing DIT (10 days before exam)

Exam experience:
Cried on my drive home....

I felt like I had guessed (and not educated guesses) 80% of my exam. it was nothing like what I expected. I had no time to review marked questions and barely finished on time for every section. stopped marking questions after 2nd set. By the last 2 sets I had given up and felt like I was randomly clicking answers just to finish. It was the worst feeling ever. I had many nightmares in the following weeks.... Was initially aiming for a 240... walked out almost positive I got something below 200 or failed... would have been happy/shocked to see anything close to 220....had started making plans for an alternate/backup career in my head 😀

Actual score: 240 😀

moral of the story: when people tell you you did better than you think you did, take their word for it!
Click to expand...
Congrats 🙂
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
DrSmday said:
Read through a bunch of these during my freak-out Step 1 period... Hope this helps someone down the line

Studied for 5 weeks, did DIT in 3.5 weeks with a study partner...

Did one Uworld Qset 1st thing in the morning... went over answers, wrote down random facts in a notebook/annotated FA
listened to 9-12 lectures/day
Spent the evening going over/memorizing FA details on topics covered in DIT that day

Last 10days did 2problem sets/day, read FA, and reviewed my notebook of random facts... Started by reading FA sections I wasn't too comfortable with

Uworld: finished 90% of Qbank, started and ended with timed random sets... was in the 40s first week.... overall 69%, ranging between 76-85% last 16 sets

UWorld SA 1 : 247 day after finishing DIT (10 days before exam)

Exam experience:
Cried on my drive home....

I felt like I had guessed (and not educated guesses) 80% of my exam. it was nothing like what I expected. I had no time to review marked questions and barely finished on time for every section. stopped marking questions after 2nd set. By the last 2 sets I had given up and felt like I was randomly clicking answers just to finish. It was the worst feeling ever. I had many nightmares in the following weeks.... Was initially aiming for a 240... walked out almost positive I got something below 200 or failed... would have been happy/shocked to see anything close to 220....had started making plans for an alternate/backup career in my head 😀

Actual score: 240 😀

moral of the story: when people tell you you did better than you think you did, take their word for it!
Click to expand...

Congratulations!!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
DrSmday said:
Read through a bunch of these during my freak-out Step 1 period... Hope this helps someone down the line

Studied for 5 weeks, did DIT in 3.5 weeks with a study partner...

Did one Uworld Qset 1st thing in the morning... went over answers, wrote down random facts in a notebook/annotated FA
listened to 9-12 lectures/day
Spent the evening going over/memorizing FA details on topics covered in DIT that day

Last 10days did 2problem sets/day, read FA, and reviewed my notebook of random facts... Started by reading FA sections I wasn't too comfortable with

Uworld: finished 90% of Qbank, started and ended with timed random sets... was in the 40s first week.... overall 69%, ranging between 76-85% last 16 sets

UWorld SA 1 : 247 day after finishing DIT (10 days before exam)

Exam experience:
Cried on my drive home....

I felt like I had guessed (and not educated guesses) 80% of my exam. it was nothing like what I expected. I had no time to review marked questions and barely finished on time for every section. stopped marking questions after 2nd set. By the last 2 sets I had given up and felt like I was randomly clicking answers just to finish. It was the worst feeling ever. I had many nightmares in the following weeks.... Was initially aiming for a 240... walked out almost positive I got something below 200 or failed... would have been happy/shocked to see anything close to 220....had started making plans for an alternate/backup career in my head 😀

Actual score: 240 😀

moral of the story: when people tell you you did better than you think you did, take their word for it!
Click to expand...

i felt the same on my exam: i went in there feeling it would go ok, but felt like crying after the exam. Took it on july 30th, still waiting for my results. I really feel like i didn't do so well, the first 2 blocks were insane, i got so many cell bio and genetics questions! Great job on your score! hope i have a similar story 🙁
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Just a quick question, I have a month to go till the exam, have 30% of UWorld left and I'm going to take a NBME soon to see if my prep so far is alright. Is it worth doing Kaplan Qbank or USMLERx once I finish UWorld? Or is it better to just stick to Uworld and do the incorrect again and know it well?
Any input appreciated, Thanks!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
doctr2be said:
Just a quick question, I have a month to go till the exam, have 30% of UWorld left and I'm going to take a NBME soon to see if my prep so far is alright. Is it worth doing Kaplan Qbank or USMLERx once I finish UWorld? Or is it better to just stick to Uworld and do the incorrect again and know it well?
Any input appreciated, Thanks!
Click to expand...

I would muster a guess and say that you should finish UWorld and know it well. How is your retention of FA material? If you're solid on it, forget about Rx.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
A weird case: my friend finished UW with 90% (timed, random, 1st time). Even with that high cumulative, he got 259 and 257 in NBME 15 and 13, respectively. Any similar case?!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Phloston said:
3rd edition has a few changes (kid in my PhD lab has the pack and I've looked through it), but they're not a big deal. 2nd edition is good.

Few discrepancies between Microcards and FA though:

Microcards mention delta virus as icosahedral but FA and literature --> helical.

Microcards mention arena virus as ss(-) non-segmented RNA virus, but FA says circular with two segments.

Microcards also list bunyavirus as ss(-) segmented, but FA mentions that it's circular with three segments.

That's all I can really think of right now, but apart from that, Microcards are solid.
Click to expand...

I went ahead and ordered the newest edition, the preview for them looked great 🙂.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
He did not get the result yet. The weird thing that although his UW cumulative is superb (90%), his NBMEs are not parallel to it. I did not find any similar case in the thread. Anybody with similar experience?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
stronghold said:
He did not get the result yet. The weird thing that although his UW cumulative is superb (90%), his NBMEs are not parallel to it. I did not find any similar case in the thread. Anybody with similar experience?
Click to expand...

Yup, me (kind of). 89% cumulative on uworld (timed, unused, random 46ers), rising slowly (have done about 2/3 of the qbank). I got a 660 (259) on NBME 12 (8 weeks out) and NBME 11 got me a 670 (261) (today - 4 weeks out), after a 5-day vacation...however I should note that I have not yet completed a first pass of FA (relied too heavily on review books and started annotating too late).

I guess that there is some correlation between qbank score and real deal, though the correlation coefficient for that has a rather small value...There is no need to be demoralized over a low(=lower than expected) NBME or qbank %. Studying hard and constantly improvising one's studying and testtaking strategy are all that's needed.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0 Downvote
Antiochos said:
Yup, me (kind of). 89% cumulative on uworld (timed, unused, random 46ers), rising slowly (have done about 2/3 of the qbank). I got a 660 (259) on NBME 12 (8 weeks out) and NBME 11 got me a 670 (261) (today - 4 weeks out), after a 5-day vacation...however I should note that I have not yet completed a first pass of FA (relied too heavily on review books and started annotating too late).

I guess that there is some correlation between qbank score and real deal, though the correlation coefficient for that has a rather small value...There is no need to be demoralized over a low(=lower than expected) NBME or qbank %. Studying hard and constantly improvising one's studying and testtaking strategy are all that's needed.
Click to expand...

Thanks for input. My friend's NBMEs were -after UW completion- 2 weeks and one week before the test. I think your case is a bit different since FA X3 and UW were completed before NBMEs. What do you think? Their NBMEs don't correlate at all with the UW score
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
stronghold said:
Thanks for input. My friend's NBMEs were -after UW completion- 2 weeks and one week before the test. I think your case is a bit different since FA X3 and UW were completed before NBMEs. What do you think? Their NBMEs don't correlate at all with the UW score
Click to expand...

Unfortunately I have noted that the NBMEs are the only -reasonably accurate- predictive tools for the real score...However, big leaps forward in terms of score are quite possible (though rather rare). Given that your friend seems to have a strong knowledge base as indicated by the qbank %, it may have been a matter of endurance or stress.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Antiochos said:
Yup, me (kind of). 89% cumulative on uworld (timed, unused, random 46ers), rising slowly (have done about 2/3 of the qbank). I got a 660 (259) on NBME 12 (8 weeks out) and NBME 11 got me a 670 (261) (today - 4 weeks out), after a 5-day vacation...however I should note that I have not yet completed a first pass of FA (relied too heavily on review books and started annotating too late).

I guess that there is some correlation between qbank score and real deal, though the correlation coefficient for that has a rather small value...There is no need to be demoralized over a low(=lower than expected) NBME or qbank %. Studying hard and constantly improvising one's studying and testtaking strategy are all that's needed.
Click to expand...

Wow that's impressive. I'm barely managing a 70% Uworld first pass, and most were done subject wise. I'm going to take my first NBME soon, which one would you suggest?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
doctr2be said:
Wow that's impressive. I'm barely managing a 70% Uworld first pass, and most were done subject wise. I'm going to take my first NBME soon, which one would you suggest?
Click to expand...

I would suggest any of the 11-15 range NBMEs, but be sure to do 15, and preferably last as it is the one most similar to the current exam. Also pick extended editions so that you can see your mistakes afterwards.

About the Qbank %, it is generally considered a must to check which topics you get wrong and put a greater emphasis on them while studying. Read the explanation for every question whose answer you were unsure of (even if you got it right eventually). Personally, when approaching a question, I usually try not only picking the right answer, but also rapidly thinking why each of the other options is wrong. Moreover, this thread has a ton of posts with helpful info about optimization of the qbank use!

In the end though (personal experience), it is all about 1) capacity to apply knowledge and 2) knowledge of facts. Keep practicing to increase your ability to make correct educated guesses and study hard and smart to keep these guessing instances at a minimum.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Antiochos said:
I would suggest any of the 11-15 range NBMEs, but be sure to do 15, and preferably last as it is the one most similar to the current exam. Also pick extended editions so that you can see your mistakes afterwards.

About the Qbank %, it is generally considered a must to check which topics you get wrong and put a greater emphasis on them while studying. Read the explanation for every question whose answer you were unsure of (even if you got it right eventually). Personally, when approaching a question, I usually try not only picking the right answer, but also rapidly thinking why each of the other options is wrong. Moreover, this thread has a ton of posts with helpful info about optimization of the qbank use!

In the end though (personal experience), it is all about 1) capacity to apply knowledge and 2) knowledge of facts. Keep practicing to increase your ability to make correct educated guesses and study hard and smart to keep these guessing instances at a minimum.
Click to expand...

I'll keep that in mind while doing the Qbank, thanks for the advice!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Sorry if this has been asked a million times already, but does anyone know if the exam gets harder the later in the year you take it when it's not "peak" season?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Long time lurker on this thread. Score came back last week. It's in this blog post.

Also, off the top of my head here were the scores of practice tests in order (ish)

NBME 12 = 245
Kaplan FL 1 = 244
CBSE = 242
UWA 1 = 246
NBME 13 = 250 something
NBME 6,7,11 = Offline, 90+%
Kaplan FL 2 = 255
UWA 2 = 265+
NBME 15 = 250 something

Moral of the story, do a ton of questions.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
And if people were interested in their percentile, assuming a normal distribution around 227 with a SD of 22 (those are the #s on the score report, but it does not assume a normal distribution) you can use this equation.

solve[22*sqrt(2)*erfc^(-1)((100-x)/50)+227=y,x]

where y is your score.

Put it into this website and it will give you your percentile

http://www.wolframalpha.com
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Frostling said:
Took mine on the 28th n still waiting... Im hoping the print permit link disappears tomorrow so we know...
Click to expand...
I am pretty sure my scheduling permit link has disappeared if I'm understanding all of the legend regarding the permit. Can anyone take a look and tell me what they think? There was a hyperlink under "Permit Available Date" this morning...it is not there anymore.
 

Attachments

  • Scheduling Permit.jpg
    Scheduling Permit.jpg
    20 KB · Views: 182
Upvote 0 Downvote
took mine on the 27th of july. permit disappeard today! hoping to get my score back this wednesday!

btw. does the permit disappearing mean you passed??? cos thats all i care about really.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
COXblocker said:
And if people were interested in their percentile, assuming a normal distribution around 227 with a SD of 22 (those are the #s on the score report, but it does not assume a normal distribution) you can use this equation.

solve[22*sqrt(2)*erfc^(-1)((100-x)/50)+227=y,x]

where y is your score.

Put it into this website and it will give you your percentile

http://www.wolframalpha.com
Click to expand...

What is the point of this equation if the NBME comes out and flatly states those numbers are NOT pertaining to a normal distribution?

From what I understand, along with a canonical Phloston post (see below) from like a year ago and a med school dean the test's score distribution has a right skew and, therefore, is far from normal.

See post #91 (first image): http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?p=13594836
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0 Downvote
doc8383 said:
so nervous! Lol..wish u the best!! hopefully it will come out this wed, don't want to wait another week
Click to expand...

Thanks! Im sure its coming out wednesday now. My permit link disappeared! Hopefully all our results will come out this wednesday, good luck!
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
COXblocker said:
And if people were interested in their percentile, assuming a normal distribution around 227 with a SD of 22 (those are the #s on the score report, but it does not assume a normal distribution) you can use this equation.

solve[22*sqrt(2)*erfc^(-1)((100-x)/50)+227=y,x]

where y is your score.

Put it into this website and it will give you your percentile

http://www.wolframalpha.com
Click to expand...

This may be subject to change. When I got my score back initially on July 10 there were different numbers being reported with a much narrower SD. I think this number floats as more people get their scores reported. But at this point we may be far enough along that the numbers are pretty close to final.

I'd like to see something actually released by the NBME that has more rigorous stats rather than just a mean and SD spit out on the score report. Anyone know if/when something like this comes out?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
SpecterGT260 said:
This may be subject to change. When I got my score back initially on July 10 there were different numbers being reported with a much narrower SD. I think this number floats as more people get their scores reported. But at this point we may be far enough along that the numbers are pretty close to final.

I'd like to see something actually released by the NBME that has more rigorous stats rather than just a mean and SD spit out on the score report. Anyone know if/when something like this comes out?
Click to expand...

No.

Knowing how they're driven by money, they'd probably jack up the price $100 per exam just to tell us what the Mode is and call it Super Extended Feedback.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I know most people here wouldn't even know what to say to this...

But I just did UWSA 1 and got 221... My exam is September 7th and I'm completely freaking out right now...

I just did NBME 11 a couple of days ago and got 214. I don't understand how my UWSA score is 221?! (I'm going by subtracting 20 from UWSA to get your real score).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0 Downvote
skyblue2000 said:
I know most people here wouldn't even know what to say to this...

But I just did UWSA 1 and got 221... My exam is September 7th and I'm completely freaking out right now...

I just did NBME 11 a couple of days ago and got 214. I don't understand how my UWSA score is 221?! (I'm going by subtracting 20 from UWSA to get your real score).
Click to expand...

the nbme is predictive so your probably around the 214 range... take another nbme in a week and you'll know for sure.. uwsa's overpredict
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
skyblue2000 said:
I know most people here wouldn't even know what to say to this...

But I just did UWSA 1 and got 221... My exam is September 7th and I'm completely freaking out right now...

I just did NBME 11 a couple of days ago and got 214. I don't understand how my UWSA score is 221?! (I'm going by subtracting 20 from UWSA to get your real score).
Click to expand...


you are a failure and a disgrace to the medical profession. please withdraw from med school immediately and apply for a job at burger king
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Transposony
Official 2024 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread
Replies
0
Views
2K
Transposony
Transposony
D
Step 1 and Level 1
Replies
1
Views
3K
DOcSto
D
C
Step 1 tutor available!
Replies
0
Views
1K
chauhanjugalkishor
C
A
USMLE Step 1 resources for sale
Replies
0
Views
2K
accurate_branch20
A
G
  • Question Question
USMLE Out of time and not ready for Step 1. Have I screwed up?
Replies
0
Views
562
genteel-mug-sting
G
Top