USMLE Official 2018 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Thanks 🙂
I started preparing back in mid-January (thinking about it now, I have literally only taken one day off from step studying in over 5 months, and even that one day was involuntary haha). From January to mid-April I completed Rx. I did 30 questions/day, which took me about 3-4 hrs/day on average. I don't think Rx gets enough credit, I really think it's superior to Kaplan. I read every single explanation and every First Aid page (Rx gives you screenshots of relevant FA pages with every question). It did get repetitive, I think I read the FA about macrocytic anemias at least 20 times), but I think doing that was largely the reason for my success so far. I've done about 1000 Kaplan problems, about 500 of those were done throughout M2 as study for my EOB exams. The other 500 have been scattered throughout the last few months when I had spare time. I'll probably be working through a bit more of Kaplan in the next two weeks (or one week, if I decide to move my exam), but I have no strong desire to finish it.

In mid-April after I completed Rx, we started our multisystems course, which is also when I took my first practice exams (NBME 13 and CBSE). That's also when I started UWorld, which I completed a few days ago. I don't plan on doing a second pass of UWorld, because my greatest strength is my ability to memorize, so I know that I will get many questions correct only because I remember the answer from my first pass.

I watched all of Pathoma along with classes during M1/M2. I have watched a few of the chapters again during dedicated, mostly the first three chapters and then 2 or 3 of the organ system chapters. At this point I feel like I'm not learning anything new from Pathoma so I probably won't use it anymore (it's a fantastic resource though). I watched a few sketchy micro videos during the last two years for classes, but I haven't used it at all during dedicated and I don't really feel the need to. I think it's a great resource for people who struggling with memorizing facts, though.

So I guess I have mostly been able to achieve those scores through practice questions. I was a bit nervous about relying so heavily on practice questions because it always seems like everyone else is using 500 different resources, some of which I had never even heard of until a few weeks ago (DIT, boards and beyond, Goljan). But so far I'm glad that I trusted my intuition and decided to stick with practice questions. For reference, I am a solidly average student compared to the rest of my class, and I had to work pretty damn hard to stay above average.

EDIT: oh! almost forgot. I also used the Rx videos for biochem and immunology. Basic science tends to be my weakest area, and I found those videos enormously helpful. I actually enjoy biochem questions now!


Thank you so much for your post! That was really helpful. Did you feel like Rx along with first aid was sufficient enough for the micro and pharm? Also,did you use anki to keep up with what you had already studied? I have not used anki before and do not plan to as I feel like it is not as effective for me but am open to trying it as people on here swear by it haha. Lastly, how would you say your foundation was when you started studying in January? Sorry for the bombardment of questions but I really appreciate it! Thanks for taking the time to respond!
 
Thank you so much for your post! That was really helpful. Did you feel like Rx along with first aid was sufficient enough for the micro and pharm? Also,did you use anki to keep up with what you had already studied? I have not used anki before and do not plan to as I feel like it is not as effective for me but am open to trying it as people on here swear by it haha. Lastly, how would you say your foundation was when you started studying in January? Sorry for the bombardment of questions but I really appreciate it! Thanks for taking the time to respond!

In terms of my foundation before starting, it was pretty decent. Like I said, I am an average student, but at the same time the average step score at my school is in the 240s. So I think that definitely helped a lot. But in terms of micro, my school is actually pretty weak with micro. I did feel like First Aid and Rx were adequate for learning micro.

I'm a big fan of anki, but I didn't actually start using it until I started UWorld. I've mostly used it to memorize those obscure little facts from First Aid that have like a 0.0001% chance of actually showing up on step haha.
 
OK results are in for NBME 18.
NBME 13: 234
CBSE: 248
UWSA1: 258
UWSA2: 256
NBME 15: 261
NBME 16: 263
NBME 17: 257
NBME 18: 255

Not particularly happy with that result. I don't understand why I am regressing, this is so frustrating.
I said I'd re-schedule if I scored above 250, so I guess I'll do it. Might as well at this point, if I'm going to keep regressing I might as well take it before my scores get even worse.
 
I also got less than UWSA2 on 18, I thought its harder and feel you’re between 255-260 tbh. Take a week to read on weak points if you’re not burnt out otherwise I think take it asap.

18 definitely felt way harder to me, but I'm having a hard time articulating why exactly it was so difficult. What's frustrating is that based on my score reports, I don't necessarily have specific topics that I am weak in. I think if anything my weakness is probably my ability to logic through questions, and I am not convinced that I'm going to be able to change that at this point.
 
OK results are in for NBME 18.
NBME 13: 234
CBSE: 248
UWSA1: 258
UWSA2: 256
NBME 15: 261
NBME 16: 263
NBME 17: 257
NBME 18: 255

Not particularly happy with that result. I don't understand why I am regressing, this is so frustrating.
I said I'd re-schedule if I scored above 250, so I guess I'll do it. Might as well at this point, if I'm going to keep regressing I might as well take it before my scores get even worse.

I think your scores are still within the range of normal variance. NBME says +/- 6 points, and I would probably guess after 250 it's even wider than that -- given how many points each question is worth at the top end.

I would definitely recommend moving up your test. Despite what some people like to think, overstudying on Step 1 is a real thing. Saw many of my classmates that were gunning for high scores delay their test too long and ended up severely underperforming (10+ points below their NBME average). My theory is that people get so caught up in the minutiae, trying to get those 270+ scores, that they forget the big picture and don't even realize it until they sit down to take the test.
 
I think your scores are still within the range of normal variance. NBME says +/- 6 points, and I would probably guess after 250 it's even wider than that -- given how many points each question is worth at the top end.

I would definitely recommend moving up your test. Despite what some people like to think, overstudying on Step 1 is a real thing. Saw many of my classmates that were gunning for high scores delay their test too long and ended up severely underperforming (10+ points below their NBME average). My theory is that people get so caught up in the minutiae, trying to get those 270+ scores, that they forget the big picture and don't even realize it until they sit down to take the test.

Actually as I was taking 18 I had that exact thought, that maybe I've been spending so much time trying to memorize little facts that I am forgetting the bigger concepts.
 
UWSA2 was more similar. When we say 18 was more similar its because of absurd questions being in a higher number BUT 18 had weird questions on things like path vs exam on excepted things like anatomy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Haha not sure how that makes me feel given that UWSA2 was my lowest (excepting 13 and the CBSE which probably don't mean much for me as I had not started UWorld yet).
 
Actually as I was taking 18 I had that exact thought, that maybe I've been spending so much time trying to memorize little facts that I am forgetting the bigger concepts.

I had the same problem. For me rewatching all of pathoma that week leading up to the test helped both put everything together and look at the big picture during questions. also got three questions on the real test that I heard on pathoma the day before.
That was my second time through it, maybe not worth it if you're already done it twice.
 
Just re-scheduled for Saturday. What a weight off my shoulders.

Plan for this week is to finish up my read-through of First Aid, should be done with that on Wednesday. Will probably take NBME 19 on Monday, and the prometric practice test on Wednesday. I'm assuming there's no point in me doing the free 120 since there's so much overlap with the prometric practice test.

Other than that, I guess I'll just try to keep calm and not go too crazy with studying. I'll probably go through my flashcards and FA rapid review on Thursday. And then just spend Friday relaxing.

If anyone has any advice for things I should do in the last week, let me know!
 
I think your scores are still within the range of normal variance. NBME says +/- 6 points, and I would probably guess after 250 it's even wider than that -- given how many points each question is worth at the top end.

I would definitely recommend moving up your test. Despite what some people like to think, overstudying on Step 1 is a real thing. Saw many of my classmates that were gunning for high scores delay their test too long and ended up severely underperforming (10+ points below their NBME average). My theory is that people get so caught up in the minutiae, trying to get those 270+ scores, that they forget the big picture and don't even realize it until they sit down to take the test.

Actually as I was taking 18 I had that exact thought, that maybe I've been spending so much time trying to memorize little facts that I am forgetting the bigger concepts.

This is exactly what I've actually been worrying about the past few weeks lol I'm afraid I'm trying to memorize so much minutiae that I'm not focussing enough on the bigger picture. This is actually why earlier I was asking if anki was really worth it at this point or if I should head to do more reading/questions because I felt that so much of the mintuae might not really be as important as I think. Any thoughts?
 
Haha Good to know. I've been pulling out little things in FA and UWorld that I think might be important and I would be less likely to remember without anki and making them into cards. Hopefully I'm picking out the right stuff lol everything sometimes feels like high-yield
 
This is exactly what I've actually been worrying about the past few weeks lol I'm afraid I'm trying to memorize so much minutiae that I'm not focussing enough on the bigger picture. This is actually why earlier I was asking if anki was really worth it at this point or if I should head to do more reading/questions because I felt that so much of the mintuae might not really be as important as I think. Any thoughts?
there will be tiny details and seemingly irrelevant diseases on the real test. Just be conscious of the big picture when doing uworld questions and practice tests. Make it a habit.
 
there will be tiny details and seemingly irrelevant diseases on the real test. Just be conscious of the big picture when doing uworld questions and practice tests. Make it a habit.

Thanks! I think I'll definitely be doing this more now that we've all brought it to light. I just wasn't sure if the test was going to be more like "Here's a patient with aortic dissection, do you remember what layer is dissected?" or more like "Here's a patient with HTN, Diabetes, and Aortic Dissection, now can you answer this question on it based off the stem [and then gives you a question not in UFAPs but you would have to answer it with what you know about those conditions and how they interact etc]." That kinda make sense? That's where my thought process has been recently. Anyone able to shed some light to this
 
This is exactly what I've actually been worrying about the past few weeks lol I'm afraid I'm trying to memorize so much minutiae that I'm not focussing enough on the bigger picture. This is actually why earlier I was asking if anki was really worth it at this point or if I should head to do more reading/questions because I felt that so much of the mintuae might not really be as important as I think. Any thoughts?

Minutiae still has its place, there's an inevitable amount of that on the real deal. My point was that you can't possibly prepare for everything they throw at you, and attempting to do so tends to do more harm than good because in the process it becomes very easy to forget big picture things that'll still make up the majority of every test.

People like to focus on the questions that are hard and seemingly out of nowhere, but it's important to remember that at least 60% of the test is softies. Don't miss these.

Just as an example, to make my point clear: You should know CD13 and CD33 are markers for Myeloblasts, that's not minutiae. Knowing FLT3 mutations are associated with AML is minutiae; it might show up, but very unlikely.
 
Thanks! I think I'll definitely be doing this more now that we've all brought it to light. I just wasn't sure if the test was going to be more like "Here's a patient with aortic dissection, do you remember what layer is dissected?" or more like "Here's a patient with HTN, Diabetes, and Aortic Dissection, now can you answer this question on it based off the stem [and then gives you a question not in UFAPs but you would have to answer it with what you know about those conditions and how they interact etc]." That kinda make sense? That's where my thought process has been recently. Anyone able to shed some light to this


Also related to this, I am not sure if others feel the same but having done uworld twice I have formed this way of thinking which helps TREMENDOUSLY in reasoning but when it comes to the NBME style questions that almost require you to recognize buzzwords I completely freeze. How can this be avoided?

Also for those that took the exam, did the stem of the questions on the exam give as much information as uworld so that reasoning could be done or was it dependent on recognizing key phrases similar to NBME?
 
Since everyone else seemed to have decided to take NBME 18 today, I thought I'd take it too. Certainly didn't feel good taking it, but it appears I got better at guessing or something.

Only difference I can really tell between this NBME and the one I took 2 weeks ago is that while there were just as many questions I wasn't sure about, I at least could recognize what was going on in most of them at this point.

Anyway:
NBME 13: 200 - 12 weeks out, baseline before any studying

CBSE: 213 - 8 weeks out (studying with classes for 1 month)

NBME 15: 217 - 8 weeks out (back to back with CBSE)

NBME 16: 221 - 4 weeks out (1 week into dedicated)

UW SIM 1: 249 - 3 weeks out

NBME 18: 242 - 2 weeks out

Also there was a crazy lighting/hail storm during the second half of the test. Power went out so I had to finish Blocks 3 & 4 by candle light using my cell phone for wifi. Which was...interesting.
 
Since everyone else seemed to have decided to take NBME 18 today, I thought I'd take it too. Certainly didn't feel good taking it, but it appears I got better at guessing or something.

Only difference I can really tell between this NBME and the one I took 2 weeks ago is that while there were just as many questions I wasn't sure about, I at least could recognize what was going on in most of them at this point.

Anyway:
NBME 13: 200 - 12 weeks out, baseline before any studying

CBSE: 213 - 8 weeks out (studying with classes for 1 month)

NBME 15: 217 - 8 weeks out (back to back with CBSE)

NBME 16: 221 - 4 weeks out (1 week into dedicated)

UW SIM 1: 249 - 3 weeks out

NBME 18: 242 - 2 weeks out

Also there was a crazy lighting/hail storm during the second half of the test. Power went out so I had to finish Blocks 3 & 4 by candle light using my cell phone for wifi. Which was...interesting.


Congrats on the improvement! Especially given those crazy circumstances haha.
 
OK why would diabetic gastroparesis cause diarrhea? Everything I can find says it causes constipation and infrequent bowel movements. But on NBME there's a question where the dude is a type 1 diabetic and it asks why he's having diarrhea, and the answer is "motility disorder".
 
I'm guessing galactitol accumulation within schwann cells -> osmotic damage has something to do with the development of the diabetic gastroparesis as well, just like with any diabetic neuropathy. Or at least it sounds like it could be a plausible explanation
 
Autonomic neuropathy in vagus causing food backup causing osmotic diarrhea.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks! I have to say that's kind of a BS question then, because one of the options was osmosis and I put that, which was wrong. I guess it was wrong because that wasn't the primary defect, and osmosis would be the answer if the person had lactose intolerance or something.
 
The KING of all lurkers here just took the test yesterday… as you can see this is literally my first post and like a typical lurker im making this post because it was helpful reading all of these posts during dedicated and wanted to switch it up add my 2cents. Profile: US med student, top 50 school, slightly above average student Resources: (UFAPer supplemented with Firecracker, Sketchy Micro and Pharm, BnB and Goljan audio)

The unyielding beast that is the USMLE Step 1 was without a doubt it was the HARDEST exam I’ve ever taken in my life (would anyone who took it recently agree?), and I think part of the reason I feel sick right now is because I was aiming for a 245+ and I felt the margin of error on the NBME’s was so low that in order to do well I had to have a stellar day and land most of my 50/50’s. So now I’m sitting in my room staring at a wall praying that other med students would have found my test just as difficult HA. It’s tough knowing many questions I definitely know I got wrong already that were some EASY softball qs and 50/50’s, nevermind the difficult questions. It’s a sick feeling to prepare for something for pretty much two years and feel like you didn’t give it your best effort on the day and have to now rely on some sort of curve, I wish this upon no one lol, but hopefully I did well enough to not be completely ashamed of myself.

Don’t get me wrong, the first thing I will say specifically about the test is there are a TON of gimmes (maybe 50%) if you studied UFAP even through one pass like I imagine any medical student would, you will get most, if not, all of these correct. Don’t be like me and panic during the test miss some of these lol. Then, I would say like maybe an additional 25-30% was in UFAP but were a specific one line detail almost as if the examiners were to say “did you read this one obscure fact in FA that never showed up in UW? Or did you understand the reasoning behind this one concept in UW?” I even saw a concept tested from Pathoma that was in no other resource 😳 (these type q’s is what I imagine would separate a 220 from 240), then, maybe another 5-10% were not in any of the major resources but you could probably make an intelligent guess based on answer choices (this is what I think would probably separate 250 from 260 idk), and the rest were complete WTF questions from outerspace - for me these came from embryology, micro, immuno, things that would never in a million years show up in UFAP, but that you hopefully picked up in an upper level undergrad science course, research experience, additional supplementary resource or just by being genius- Therefore I would say the beast is unlike any NBME of UWSA in that the range of difficulty is insane (think from the easiest NBME question to the hardest UWSA question)

EXTRA random things I noticed:

1. A good portion of things you consider high yield will not be on the test---I remember during MS1 one of my professors GUARANTEED a certain concept on the test, didn’t even come CLOSE to showing up on the real---the questions are more skewed that you would think, with many repeat concepts. Flipping through FA after the test was frustrating for me because A LOT of concepts I knew cold and were ‘high yield’ did not show up, though with that being said there were a couple lower yield concept on pages in FA or UW questions that I had a sneaking suspicion would show up were staring right back at me in the first couple of blocks.

2. Keep in mind is that the method by which they ask the more difficult questions is unlike anything you would have ever seen or imagined. They have an uncanny skill of taking a concept you think you know backwards and forwards, and putting it in the 5th dimension (like that one scene in intrastellar lol). So know what you already know COLD and know that you know it COLD you don’t want to be second guessing yourself a basic concept on the test.

3. The test is picture HEAVY (CT’s MRI, gross specimens, rashes,) –almost 10% of mine I would say—most of which are not in FA, I would listen to Dr Ryan on BnB and he would say “after this video you should go and google pictures of this” and never do it thinking his pictures combined with FA were enough LOL. Even if you haven’t been doing this at least know how something is described in a picture so when it shows up on the real thing you can make a strong guess.

4. I got surprisingly a lot of : “What’s the next best step in management of this patient” type questions in true vague Step 2- esque fashion which brings me to my last thought that I had coming out of the exam…

I feel strongly that 20 years from now, most US medical schools will require their students to spend a year, or perhaps a semester doing actual clinical rotations BEFORE they sit for Step 1 and Step 2. There are already schools that already do this a good example is Baylor, where they rotate for about a year and a half then take Step 1 and 2 back to back. Go look at their school’s Step 1 average last year…its ridiculously high (the highest) and is most likely significant correlated (with a few effect modifiers lol) with the fact that they have more clinical experience than the average student before taking Step. Which now after taking the exam, I realize that a mere semester (even half a semester) in clinicals in addition to UFAP would easily have boosted my score. I also feel like the test writers are catching on to the fact that MS 1 & 2’s are getting more clinical more experience and are starting to blur the lines between licensing exams.

I’ll finish with my stats:

CBSE 203

NBME 13 215

NBME 15 225

NBME 16 240

NBME 17 236

UWSA 1 251

NBME 18 236

NBME 19 236

UWSA 2 249

Free 120: 86%

Will try my best to answer questions you all may have, but I l have to revise a journal paper and get ready for clincals that start in a couple of weeks Good luck to you all. As cliché as this last part will sound, remember you are more than just a score, keep the fire burning not only for a good score, but to become an excellent clinician and improve the lives of your future patients!
 
Last edited:
The KING of all lurkers here just took the test yesterday… as you can see this is literally my first post and like a typical lurker im making this post because it was helpful reading all of these posts during dedicated and wanted to switch it up add my 2cents. Profile: US med student, top 50 school, slightly above average student Resources: (UFAPer supplemented with Sketchy Micro and Pharm, BnB and Goljan audio)

The unyielding beast that is the USMLE Step 1 was without a doubt it was the HARDEST exam I’ve ever taken in my life (would anyone who took it recently agree?), and I think part of the reason I feel sick right now is because I was aiming for a 245+ and I felt the margin of error on the NBME’s was so low that in order to do well I had to have a stellar day and land most of my 50/50’s. So now I’m sitting in my room staring at a wall praying that other med students would have found my test just as difficult HA. It’s tough knowing many questions I definitely know I got wrong already that were some EASY softball qs and 50/50’s, nevermind the difficult questions. It’s a sick feeling to prepare for something for pretty much two years and feel like you didn’t give it your best effort on the day and have to now rely on some sort of curve, I wish this upon no one lol, but hopefully I did well enough to not be completely ashamed of myself.

Don’t get me wrong, the first thing I will say specifically about the test is there are a TON of gimmes (maybe 50%) if you studied UFAP even through one pass like I imagine any medical student would, you will get most, if not, all of these correct. Don’t be like me and panic during the test miss some of these lol. Then, I would say like maybe an additional 25-30% was in UFAP but were a specific one line detail almost as if the examiners were to say “did you read this one obscure fact in FA that never showed up in UW? Or did you understand the reasoning behind this one concept in UW?” I even saw a concept tested from Pathoma that was in no other resource 😳 (these type q’s is what I imagine would separate a 220 from 240), then, maybe another 5-10% were not in any of the major resources but you could probably make an intelligent guess based on answer choices (this is what I think would probably separate 250 from 260 idk), and the rest were complete WTF questions from outerspace - for me these came from embryology, micro, immuno, things that would never in a million years show up in UFAP, but that you hopefully picked up in an upper level undergrad science course, research experience, additional supplementary resource or just by being genius- Therefore I would say the beast is unlike any NBME of UWSA in that the range of difficulty is insane (think from the easiest NBME question to the hardest UWSA question)

EXTRA random things I noticed:

1. A good portion of things you consider high yield will not be on the test---I remember during MS1 one of my professors GUARANTEED a certain concept on the test, didn’t even come CLOSE to showing up on the real---the questions are more skewed that you would think, with many repeat concepts. Flipping through FA after the test was frustrating for me because A LOT of concepts I knew cold and were ‘high yield’ did not show up, though with that being said there were a couple lower yield concept on pages in FA or UW questions that I had a sneaking suspicion would show up were staring right back at me in the first couple of blocks.

2. Keep in mind is that the method by which they ask the more difficult questions is unlike anything you would have ever seen or imagined. They have an uncanny skill of taking a concept you think you know backwards and forwards, and putting it in the 5th dimension (like that one scene in intrastellar lol). So know what you already know COLD and know that you know it COLD you don’t want to be second guessing yourself a basic concept on the test.

3. The test is picture HEAVY (CT’s MRI, gross specimens, rashes,) –almost 10% of mine I would say—most of which are not in FA, I would listen to Dr Ryan on BnB and he would say “after this video you should go and google pictures of this” and never do it thinking his pictures combined with FA were enough LOL. Even if you haven’t been doing this at least know how something is described in a picture so when it shows up on the real thing you can make a strong guess.

4. I got surprisingly a lot of : “What’s the next best step in management of this patient” type questions in true vague Step 2- esque fashion which brings me to my last thought that I had coming out of the exam…

I feel strongly that 20 years from now, most US medical schools will require their students to spend a year, or perhaps a semester doing actual clinical rotations BEFORE they sit for Step 1 and Step 2. There are already schools that already do this a good example is Baylor, where they rotate for about a year and a half then take Step 1 and 2 back to back. Go look at their school’s Step 1 average last year…its ridiculously high (the highest) and is most likely significant correlated (with a few effect modifiers lol) with the fact that they have more clinical experience than the average student before taking Step. Which now after taking the exam, I realize that a mere semester (even half a semester) in clinicals in addition to UFAP would easily have boosted my score. I also feel like the test writers are catching on to the fact that MS 1 & 2’s are getting more clinical more experience and are starting to blur the lines between licensing exams.

I’ll finish with my stats:

CBSE 203

NBME 13 215

NBME 15 225

NBME 16 240

NBME 17 236

UWSA 1 251

NBME 18 236

NBME 19 236

UWSA 2 249

Free 120: 86%

Will try my best to answer questions you all may have, but I l have to revise a journal paper and get ready for clincals that start in a couple of weeks Good luck to you all. As cliché as this last part will sound, remember you are more than just a score, keep the fire burning not only for a good score, but to become an excellent clinician and improve the lives of your future patients!


Struggle is real....how many do u think u got wrong approximately?
 
The KING of all lurkers here just took the test yesterday… as you can see this is literally my first post and like a typical lurker im making this post because it was helpful reading all of these posts during dedicated and wanted to switch it up add my 2cents. Profile: US med student, top 50 school, slightly above average student Resources: (UFAPer supplemented with Sketchy Micro and Pharm, BnB and Goljan audio)

The unyielding beast that is the USMLE Step 1 was without a doubt it was the HARDEST exam I’ve ever taken in my life (would anyone who took it recently agree?), and I think part of the reason I feel sick right now is because I was aiming for a 245+ and I felt the margin of error on the NBME’s was so low that in order to do well I had to have a stellar day and land most of my 50/50’s. So now I’m sitting in my room staring at a wall praying that other med students would have found my test just as difficult HA. It’s tough knowing many questions I definitely know I got wrong already that were some EASY softball qs and 50/50’s, nevermind the difficult questions. It’s a sick feeling to prepare for something for pretty much two years and feel like you didn’t give it your best effort on the day and have to now rely on some sort of curve, I wish this upon no one lol, but hopefully I did well enough to not be completely ashamed of myself.

Don’t get me wrong, the first thing I will say specifically about the test is there are a TON of gimmes (maybe 50%) if you studied UFAP even through one pass like I imagine any medical student would, you will get most, if not, all of these correct. Don’t be like me and panic during the test miss some of these lol. Then, I would say like maybe an additional 25-30% was in UFAP but were a specific one line detail almost as if the examiners were to say “did you read this one obscure fact in FA that never showed up in UW? Or did you understand the reasoning behind this one concept in UW?” I even saw a concept tested from Pathoma that was in no other resource 😳 (these type q’s is what I imagine would separate a 220 from 240), then, maybe another 5-10% were not in any of the major resources but you could probably make an intelligent guess based on answer choices (this is what I think would probably separate 250 from 260 idk), and the rest were complete WTF questions from outerspace - for me these came from embryology, micro, immuno, things that would never in a million years show up in UFAP, but that you hopefully picked up in an upper level undergrad science course, research experience, additional supplementary resource or just by being genius- Therefore I would say the beast is unlike any NBME of UWSA in that the range of difficulty is insane (think from the easiest NBME question to the hardest UWSA question)

EXTRA random things I noticed:

1. A good portion of things you consider high yield will not be on the test---I remember during MS1 one of my professors GUARANTEED a certain concept on the test, didn’t even come CLOSE to showing up on the real---the questions are more skewed that you would think, with many repeat concepts. Flipping through FA after the test was frustrating for me because A LOT of concepts I knew cold and were ‘high yield’ did not show up, though with that being said there were a couple lower yield concept on pages in FA or UW questions that I had a sneaking suspicion would show up were staring right back at me in the first couple of blocks.

2. Keep in mind is that the method by which they ask the more difficult questions is unlike anything you would have ever seen or imagined. They have an uncanny skill of taking a concept you think you know backwards and forwards, and putting it in the 5th dimension (like that one scene in intrastellar lol). So know what you already know COLD and know that you know it COLD you don’t want to be second guessing yourself a basic concept on the test.

3. The test is picture HEAVY (CT’s MRI, gross specimens, rashes,) –almost 10% of mine I would say—most of which are not in FA, I would listen to Dr Ryan on BnB and he would say “after this video you should go and google pictures of this” and never do it thinking his pictures combined with FA were enough LOL. Even if you haven’t been doing this at least know how something is described in a picture so when it shows up on the real thing you can make a strong guess.

4. I got surprisingly a lot of : “What’s the next best step in management of this patient” type questions in true vague Step 2- esque fashion which brings me to my last thought that I had coming out of the exam…

I feel strongly that 20 years from now, most US medical schools will require their students to spend a year, or perhaps a semester doing actual clinical rotations BEFORE they sit for Step 1 and Step 2. There are already schools that already do this a good example is Baylor, where they rotate for about a year and a half then take Step 1 and 2 back to back. Go look at their school’s Step 1 average last year…its ridiculously high (the highest) and is most likely significant correlated (with a few effect modifiers lol) with the fact that they have more clinical experience than the average student before taking Step. Which now after taking the exam, I realize that a mere semester (even half a semester) in clinicals in addition to UFAP would easily have boosted my score. I also feel like the test writers are catching on to the fact that MS 1 & 2’s are getting more clinical more experience and are starting to blur the lines between licensing exams.

I’ll finish with my stats:

CBSE 203

NBME 13 215

NBME 15 225

NBME 16 240

NBME 17 236

UWSA 1 251

NBME 18 236

NBME 19 236

UWSA 2 249

Free 120: 86%

Will try my best to answer questions you all may have, but I l have to revise a journal paper and get ready for clincals that start in a couple of weeks Good luck to you all. As cliché as this last part will sound, remember you are more than just a score, keep the fire burning not only for a good score, but to become an excellent clinician and improve the lives of your future patients!

Thank you so much for this post! what resource would you say helped the most on this new step?
 
The KING of all lurkers here just took the test yesterday… as you can see this is literally my first post and like a typical lurker im making this post because it was helpful reading all of these posts during dedicated and wanted to switch it up add my 2cents. Profile: US med student, top 50 school, slightly above average student Resources: (UFAPer supplemented with Sketchy Micro and Pharm, BnB and Goljan audio)

The unyielding beast that is the USMLE Step 1 was without a doubt it was the HARDEST exam I’ve ever taken in my life (would anyone who took it recently agree?), and I think part of the reason I feel sick right now is because I was aiming for a 245+ and I felt the margin of error on the NBME’s was so low that in order to do well I had to have a stellar day and land most of my 50/50’s. So now I’m sitting in my room staring at a wall praying that other med students would have found my test just as difficult HA. It’s tough knowing many questions I definitely know I got wrong already that were some EASY softball qs and 50/50’s, nevermind the difficult questions. It’s a sick feeling to prepare for something for pretty much two years and feel like you didn’t give it your best effort on the day and have to now rely on some sort of curve, I wish this upon no one lol, but hopefully I did well enough to not be completely ashamed of myself.

Don’t get me wrong, the first thing I will say specifically about the test is there are a TON of gimmes (maybe 50%) if you studied UFAP even through one pass like I imagine any medical student would, you will get most, if not, all of these correct. Don’t be like me and panic during the test miss some of these lol. Then, I would say like maybe an additional 25-30% was in UFAP but were a specific one line detail almost as if the examiners were to say “did you read this one obscure fact in FA that never showed up in UW? Or did you understand the reasoning behind this one concept in UW?” I even saw a concept tested from Pathoma that was in no other resource 😳 (these type q’s is what I imagine would separate a 220 from 240), then, maybe another 5-10% were not in any of the major resources but you could probably make an intelligent guess based on answer choices (this is what I think would probably separate 250 from 260 idk), and the rest were complete WTF questions from outerspace - for me these came from embryology, micro, immuno, things that would never in a million years show up in UFAP, but that you hopefully picked up in an upper level undergrad science course, research experience, additional supplementary resource or just by being genius- Therefore I would say the beast is unlike any NBME of UWSA in that the range of difficulty is insane (think from the easiest NBME question to the hardest UWSA question)

EXTRA random things I noticed:

1. A good portion of things you consider high yield will not be on the test---I remember during MS1 one of my professors GUARANTEED a certain concept on the test, didn’t even come CLOSE to showing up on the real---the questions are more skewed that you would think, with many repeat concepts. Flipping through FA after the test was frustrating for me because A LOT of concepts I knew cold and were ‘high yield’ did not show up, though with that being said there were a couple lower yield concept on pages in FA or UW questions that I had a sneaking suspicion would show up were staring right back at me in the first couple of blocks.

2. Keep in mind is that the method by which they ask the more difficult questions is unlike anything you would have ever seen or imagined. They have an uncanny skill of taking a concept you think you know backwards and forwards, and putting it in the 5th dimension (like that one scene in intrastellar lol). So know what you already know COLD and know that you know it COLD you don’t want to be second guessing yourself a basic concept on the test.

3. The test is picture HEAVY (CT’s MRI, gross specimens, rashes,) –almost 10% of mine I would say—most of which are not in FA, I would listen to Dr Ryan on BnB and he would say “after this video you should go and google pictures of this” and never do it thinking his pictures combined with FA were enough LOL. Even if you haven’t been doing this at least know how something is described in a picture so when it shows up on the real thing you can make a strong guess.

4. I got surprisingly a lot of : “What’s the next best step in management of this patient” type questions in true vague Step 2- esque fashion which brings me to my last thought that I had coming out of the exam…

I feel strongly that 20 years from now, most US medical schools will require their students to spend a year, or perhaps a semester doing actual clinical rotations BEFORE they sit for Step 1 and Step 2. There are already schools that already do this a good example is Baylor, where they rotate for about a year and a half then take Step 1 and 2 back to back. Go look at their school’s Step 1 average last year…its ridiculously high (the highest) and is most likely significant correlated (with a few effect modifiers lol) with the fact that they have more clinical experience than the average student before taking Step. Which now after taking the exam, I realize that a mere semester (even half a semester) in clinicals in addition to UFAP would easily have boosted my score. I also feel like the test writers are catching on to the fact that MS 1 & 2’s are getting more clinical more experience and are starting to blur the lines between licensing exams.

I’ll finish with my stats:

CBSE 203

NBME 13 215

NBME 15 225

NBME 16 240

NBME 17 236

UWSA 1 251

NBME 18 236

NBME 19 236

UWSA 2 249

Free 120: 86%

Will try my best to answer questions you all may have, but I l have to revise a journal paper and get ready for clincals that start in a couple of weeks Good luck to you all. As cliché as this last part will sound, remember you are more than just a score, keep the fire burning not only for a good score, but to become an excellent clinician and improve the lives of your future patients!


I know the questions keep rolling haha but I am wondering how comparable it was to NBME vs UWSA ( I know you said that it is a beast of its own) but I am wondering in terms of how they ask the question. Thank you !!
 
Thank you so much for this post! what resource would you say helped the most on this new step?

U World is the best resource like everyone has said. It gives you any idea about the level of detail you need to know a subject to answer the difficult q's and tbh I thought people were lying about this, but I saw about 2-3 UW repeats on the real. With that being said every other resource that I listed was helpful.
 
I know the questions keep rolling haha but I am wondering how comparable it was to NBME vs UWSA ( I know you said that it is a beast of its own) but I am wondering in terms of how they ask the question. Thank you !!

It had an NBME of vibe of "do you know this or not" w or w/o a pic, mixed in with super long and concept driven UW type q's...sorry to be cliche but I would say it is a mixture of both.

To give you an analogy this is how the first five questions of my test looked like:

1. What is the color of the sky?
2. If John was carrying 10 books, then he dropped 6 of them how many books is he now carrying?
3. What is the capital of Texas?
4. 32 + 14 =
5. In the Pacific Ocean, off the western coast of the United States at a depth of 25,985 feet you can find many rarely encountered species such as the blobfish, frilled shark and the giant isopod, what is the pathophysiology behind the most common disease process affecting these species living at this level under the surface?

Like four soft ones then a WHAMMY
 
Last edited:
The KING of all lurkers here just took the test yesterday… as you can see this is literally my first post and like a typical lurker im making this post because it was helpful reading all of these posts during dedicated and wanted to switch it up add my 2cents. Profile: US med student, top 50 school, slightly above average student Resources: (UFAPer supplemented with Sketchy Micro and Pharm, BnB and Goljan audio)

The unyielding beast that is the USMLE Step 1 was without a doubt it was the HARDEST exam I’ve ever taken in my life (would anyone who took it recently agree?), and I think part of the reason I feel sick right now is because I was aiming for a 245+ and I felt the margin of error on the NBME’s was so low that in order to do well I had to have a stellar day and land most of my 50/50’s. So now I’m sitting in my room staring at a wall praying that other med students would have found my test just as difficult HA. It’s tough knowing many questions I definitely know I got wrong already that were some EASY softball qs and 50/50’s, nevermind the difficult questions. It’s a sick feeling to prepare for something for pretty much two years and feel like you didn’t give it your best effort on the day and have to now rely on some sort of curve, I wish this upon no one lol, but hopefully I did well enough to not be completely ashamed of myself.

Don’t get me wrong, the first thing I will say specifically about the test is there are a TON of gimmes (maybe 50%) if you studied UFAP even through one pass like I imagine any medical student would, you will get most, if not, all of these correct. Don’t be like me and panic during the test miss some of these lol. Then, I would say like maybe an additional 25-30% was in UFAP but were a specific one line detail almost as if the examiners were to say “did you read this one obscure fact in FA that never showed up in UW? Or did you understand the reasoning behind this one concept in UW?” I even saw a concept tested from Pathoma that was in no other resource 😳 (these type q’s is what I imagine would separate a 220 from 240), then, maybe another 5-10% were not in any of the major resources but you could probably make an intelligent guess based on answer choices (this is what I think would probably separate 250 from 260 idk), and the rest were complete WTF questions from outerspace - for me these came from embryology, micro, immuno, things that would never in a million years show up in UFAP, but that you hopefully picked up in an upper level undergrad science course, research experience, additional supplementary resource or just by being genius- Therefore I would say the beast is unlike any NBME of UWSA in that the range of difficulty is insane (think from the easiest NBME question to the hardest UWSA question)

EXTRA random things I noticed:

1. A good portion of things you consider high yield will not be on the test---I remember during MS1 one of my professors GUARANTEED a certain concept on the test, didn’t even come CLOSE to showing up on the real---the questions are more skewed that you would think, with many repeat concepts. Flipping through FA after the test was frustrating for me because A LOT of concepts I knew cold and were ‘high yield’ did not show up, though with that being said there were a couple lower yield concept on pages in FA or UW questions that I had a sneaking suspicion would show up were staring right back at me in the first couple of blocks.

2. Keep in mind is that the method by which they ask the more difficult questions is unlike anything you would have ever seen or imagined. They have an uncanny skill of taking a concept you think you know backwards and forwards, and putting it in the 5th dimension (like that one scene in intrastellar lol). So know what you already know COLD and know that you know it COLD you don’t want to be second guessing yourself a basic concept on the test.

3. The test is picture HEAVY (CT’s MRI, gross specimens, rashes,) –almost 10% of mine I would say—most of which are not in FA, I would listen to Dr Ryan on BnB and he would say “after this video you should go and google pictures of this” and never do it thinking his pictures combined with FA were enough LOL. Even if you haven’t been doing this at least know how something is described in a picture so when it shows up on the real thing you can make a strong guess.

4. I got surprisingly a lot of : “What’s the next best step in management of this patient” type questions in true vague Step 2- esque fashion which brings me to my last thought that I had coming out of the exam…

I feel strongly that 20 years from now, most US medical schools will require their students to spend a year, or perhaps a semester doing actual clinical rotations BEFORE they sit for Step 1 and Step 2. There are already schools that already do this a good example is Baylor, where they rotate for about a year and a half then take Step 1 and 2 back to back. Go look at their school’s Step 1 average last year…its ridiculously high (the highest) and is most likely significant correlated (with a few effect modifiers lol) with the fact that they have more clinical experience than the average student before taking Step. Which now after taking the exam, I realize that a mere semester (even half a semester) in clinicals in addition to UFAP would easily have boosted my score. I also feel like the test writers are catching on to the fact that MS 1 & 2’s are getting more clinical more experience and are starting to blur the lines between licensing exams.

I’ll finish with my stats:

CBSE 203

NBME 13 215

NBME 15 225

NBME 16 240

NBME 17 236

UWSA 1 251

NBME 18 236

NBME 19 236

UWSA 2 249

Free 120: 86%

Will try my best to answer questions you all may have, but I l have to revise a journal paper and get ready for clincals that start in a couple of weeks Good luck to you all. As cliché as this last part will sound, remember you are more than just a score, keep the fire burning not only for a good score, but to become an excellent clinician and improve the lives of your future patients!




I took Step a few weeks ago and couldn't believe how well your response nailed how the test actually felt for me. Word for word it felt the same if that brings u any comfort lol
 
I have a 4hr 30 minute flight coming up. Should I shell out $8 for WIFI to do a practice test? Or just read FA/pathoma? Or just relax and not study? Taking informal poll responses :whistle:.
 
Thanks! I have to say that's kind of a BS question then, because one of the options was osmosis and I put that, which was wrong. I guess it was wrong because that wasn't the primary defect, and osmosis would be the answer if the person had lactose intolerance or something.

I have this feeling about a lot of the NBME questions. With UW there’s always a reason why every other answer was wrong. On NBMEs there are some questions where there may be 2-3 “correct” answers with one being sort of arbitrarily “more correct”

And similarly there’s a lot of questions where all the answers seem wrong but one is just less wrong.
 
I think UW1x + doing and reading through the explanation of every missed question again is enough. You will see a fair number of concepts not in UW, im glad i didn't do ALL the questions again

Thanks for the post!!

Wouldn't it be helpful to get that second pass in though if its that high yield? (asking this as I literally am on my second pass, 4 weeks out from the test)

Also, is there anything you might have done differently during dedicated after having taken the test?
 
Thanks for the post!!

Wouldn't it be helpful to get that second pass in though if its that high yield? (asking this as I literally am on my second pass, 4 weeks out from the test)

Also, is there anything you might have done differently during dedicated after having taken the test?

Yeah I think if you can finish your second pass comfortably why not, you definitely want to get as many as the questions right that UFAP will give you.

I honestly feel like I did the best that I could do leading up to the exam going through the resources I mentioned in my original post. The majority of my regrets come from the exam day itself. I missed a couple of "memorization" type questions i would have normally gotten due to an overall uncomfortable testing experience
 
Yeah I think if you can finish your second pass comfortably why not, you definitely want to get as many as the questions right that UFAP will give you.

I honestly feel like I did the best that I could do leading up to the exam going through the resources I mentioned in my original post. The majority of my regrets come from the exam day itself. I missed a couple of "memorization" type questions i would have normally gotten due to an overall uncomfortable testing experience

Makes sense! I just hope I'm retaining everything that I'm reading. I spend a good amount of time using UWorld.

Were the memorization type questions ones of common disorders/disease etc or were they more like did you remember that PML commonly can involve the parietal or occipital lobes (random, obscure fact in FA)?

Edit: Also curious of your opinion, do you think it would be better to do more questions or read through the material more/anki?
 
Keep in mind that there are different forms and thus a wide range of experiences on the real thing. Mine felt exactly like NBME and UW questions. Nothing too crazy - sure there were some tough questions (including a couple of anatomy Q's that I never would have learned given infinite study time), but overall I didn't think it was anywhere near as hard as people report in this forum.

How much of that is due to different levels of preparation vs. easier forms (with harsher curves), who knows. For reference, my practice test average was 258.
 
Keep in mind that there are different forms and thus a wide range of experiences on the real thing. Mine felt exactly like NBME and UW questions. Nothing too crazy - sure there were some tough questions (including a couple of anatomy Q's that I never would have learned given infinite study time), but overall I didn't think it was anywhere near as hard as people report in this forum.

How much of that is due to different levels of preparation vs. easier forms (with harsher curves), who knows. For reference, my practice test average was 258.

You, my friend, are an outlier lol

What was your dedicated study period like?
 
Do you guys think it's overkill to memorize every detail in UWorld? For example, I just encountered a question in UWSA1 where the explanations for the wrong choices go into several uncommon porphyrias, such as variegate porphyria and congenital erythropoietic porphyria. Judging by the fact that most people balk at even memorizing the details of FA, I am pretty sure that 99.9% of people aren't trying to learn the uber-minutiae of UW. Even I skipped these minutiae on my first pass months ago, but now, 2 weeks out from the big day, I am trying my hardest to memorize every last word on my second pass. Usually each question will contain at least one esoteric gem, usually buried in the explanations for the wrong choices. I highly doubt these will show up on my test, but then again you always hear about those "wtf questions" and the so-called "experimental questions" (which, on test day, will be indistinguishable from really random, difficult questions that actually do count).
 
Do you guys think it's overkill to memorize every detail in UWorld? For example, I just encountered a question in UWSA1 where the explanations for the wrong choices go into several uncommon porphyrias, such as variegate porphyria and congenital erythropoietic porphyria. Judging by the fact that most people balk at even memorizing the details of FA, I am pretty sure that 99.9% of people aren't trying to learn the uber-minutiae of UW. Even I skipped these minutiae on my first pass months ago, but now, 2 weeks out from the big day, I am trying my hardest to memorize every last word on my second pass. Usually each question will contain at least one esoteric gem, usually buried in the explanations for the wrong choices. I highly doubt these will show up on my test, but then again you always hear about those "wtf questions" and the so-called "experimental questions" (which, on test day, will be indistinguishable from really random, difficult questions that actually do count).
It's simply not realistic for the vast majority of people to memorize every single word of a 700+ word review book. But doing so would constitute an interesting experiment, offering insight into the percentage of step 1 questions that are covered by first aid. I curious as to whether memorizing firstaid - and understanding the concepts therein - would net a 265 or 270. Surely test-taking skills must influence performance as well, though. How have your latest practice tests gone?
 
I focused on UWorld and made Anki cards for everything I didn’t already know. I used Zanki (and kept up with all reviews from day one), so I didn’t feel the need to review FA, Pathoma, or sketchy again.

Ah, that explains it. I wish I kept up with Zanki. I've matured almost all of it. Not sure if its worth maybe picking a deck a day and doing it, maybe just the pathology decks? Been struggling with this because Zanki was a huge part of my study routine for my school exams and that always allowed me to perform well. Any thoughts?
 
Top