USMLE Official 2020 Step 1 Experiences and Scores Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
5 days out from gameday. 259 on UWSA2, 86% on free 120 yesterday. Test fatigue was real on the 120, was hoping to break 90%, but in any case I am just ready to be done

Gonna review the next few days and chill. Spending more time thinking about post step vacation plans than studying at this point. COVID really messing everything up
 
5 days out from gameday. 259 on UWSA2, 86% on free 120 yesterday. Test fatigue was real on the 120, was hoping to break 90%, but in any case I am just ready to be done

Gonna review the next few days and chill. Spending more time thinking about post step vacation plans than studying at this point. COVID really messing everything up
Are you me? Because these scores are super similar to mine (when asleep, dreaming).

You're gonna kill it. Strong work!
 
I've only studied for step, and havent done metabolism, half of neuro, and 10% of pharm. I got a 481, which allegedly is actually a 581 (people have told me to add 100 to my score IDK lol)? OMM was my worst score by far, but I was still able to pull off a not terrible score without it.
Which COMSAE version is this that you/everyone refers to, with the ~100 point difference?
 
Me: *sees image of hypersegmented neutrohphils* "okay, this is totally megaloblastic anemia, impaired DNA synthesis, blah blah"
Me: "you know what, let me read and double check the stem just in case, I got time"
Me: "hmm, there is also pancytopenia. let me go down a rabbit hole and pick a completely different answer even though I knew it was impaired DNA synthesis just based on the photo alone"

At least I learned that megaloblastic anemia can also have thrombocytopenia and leukopenia, cause I somehow have never heard of that?? But, c'mon brainnnnn.
 
Me: *sees image of hypersegmented neutrohphils* "okay, this is totally megaloblastic anemia, impaired DNA synthesis, blah blah"
Me: "you know what, let me read and double check the stem just in case, I got time"
Me: "hmm, there is also pancytopenia. let me go down a rabbit hole and pick a completely different answer even though I knew it was impaired DNA synthesis just based on the photo alone"

At least I learned that megaloblastic anemia can also have thrombocytopenia and leukopenia, cause I somehow have never heard of that?? But, c'mon brainnnnn.
Heme onc and SBL are the bane of my existence. I'm heavily considering totally redoing the zanki cards for it
 
Do yall feel confident when picking the majority of your answer choices? I swear most of the time I'm doing a whole "use the force" kinda thing and just going with gut instincts rather than being able to reason through the solidly pick and answer. makes me nervous for the rest of medicine after step lol.
 
Not to do a hat trick of posts but, did my block for the day. 60% which is a bummer, silver lining is that it was still above the average, albeit only by 1%. A preliminary scroll through shows a lot of stupid mistakes. 10 glaring ones that pop out from just not reading the question all the way, but I suppose that's what I get for starting a timed exam right after drinking 3 glasses of water lol
 
0.6182.4285714
0.65194
0.7205.5714286
0.75217.1428571
0.78224.0857143
0.8228.7142857
0.82233.3428571
0.84237.9714286
0.86242.6
0.88247.2285714
0.9251.8571429
0.92256.4857143
0.95263.4285714
0.975269.2142857
1275
Just for fun - does anyone want to critique this table of % total correct on Step 1 and its corresponding three-digit score. This is accounting for the fact that 10% of the 280 are experimental question ... so the total number of scored questions become 252. I then assume that 65% (163.8 questions right) is necessary to pass Step 1 with a 194 and getting a 100% (252 questions right) would give you a score of 275. Between 163.8 and 252 is a total of 88.2 questions. Between 275 and 194 is a total of 81 points. This means that each question is roughly equal to 0.91 points. In other words, every 1% change in your amount correct roughly equates to a +/- of 2.29 to your three-digit score.
 
0.6182.4285714
0.65194
0.7205.5714286
0.75217.1428571
0.78224.0857143
0.8228.7142857
0.82233.3428571
0.84237.9714286
0.86242.6
0.88247.2285714
0.9251.8571429
0.92256.4857143
0.95263.4285714
0.975269.2142857
1275
Just for fun - does anyone want to critique this table of % total correct on Step 1 and its corresponding three-digit score. This is accounting for the fact that 10% of the 280 are experimental question ... so the total number of scored questions become 252. I then assume that 65% (163.8 questions right) is necessary to pass Step 1 with a 194 and getting a 100% (252 questions right) would give you a score of 275. Between 163.8 and 252 is a total of 88.2 questions. Between 275 and 194 is a total of 81 points. This means that each question is roughly equal to 0.91 points. In other words, every 1% change in your amount correct roughly equates to a +/- of 2.29 to your three-digit score.

damn 80% doesn't even get you in the 230s??????
 
0.6182.4285714
0.65194
0.7205.5714286
0.75217.1428571
0.78224.0857143
0.8228.7142857
0.82233.3428571
0.84237.9714286
0.86242.6
0.88247.2285714
0.9251.8571429
0.92256.4857143
0.95263.4285714
0.975269.2142857
1275
Just for fun - does anyone want to critique this table of % total correct on Step 1 and its corresponding three-digit score. This is accounting for the fact that 10% of the 280 are experimental question ... so the total number of scored questions become 252. I then assume that 65% (163.8 questions right) is necessary to pass Step 1 with a 194 and getting a 100% (252 questions right) would give you a score of 275. Between 163.8 and 252 is a total of 88.2 questions. Between 275 and 194 is a total of 81 points. This means that each question is roughly equal to 0.91 points. In other words, every 1% change in your amount correct roughly equates to a +/- of 2.29 to your three-digit score.

I've always been confused by these percentages. Isn't the median for UW a 63%? I know it's not an exact extrapolation, but wouldn't this table mean half the people would fail? We know this isn't the case, however.
 
0.6182.4285714
0.65194
0.7205.5714286
0.75217.1428571
0.78224.0857143
0.8228.7142857
0.82233.3428571
0.84237.9714286
0.86242.6
0.88247.2285714
0.9251.8571429
0.92256.4857143
0.95263.4285714
0.975269.2142857
1275
Just for fun - does anyone want to critique this table of % total correct on Step 1 and its corresponding three-digit score. This is accounting for the fact that 10% of the 280 are experimental question ... so the total number of scored questions become 252. I then assume that 65% (163.8 questions right) is necessary to pass Step 1 with a 194 and getting a 100% (252 questions right) would give you a score of 275. Between 163.8 and 252 is a total of 88.2 questions. Between 275 and 194 is a total of 81 points. This means that each question is roughly equal to 0.91 points. In other words, every 1% change in your amount correct roughly equates to a +/- of 2.29 to your three-digit score.

I read somewhere that passing is a 50-55%. I think the USMLE website also states that passing requires 50-60% correct. 74% on UWorld very roughly correlates to high 240s on the real deal so while it's not an exact match, I would think 80% on the real deal should get you at least low to mid 230s.
 
I've always been confused by these percentages. Isn't the median for UW a 63%? I know it's not an exact extrapolation, but wouldn't this table mean half the people would fail? We know this isn't the case, however.
This scale looks worse than the scaling on the new NBMEs
 
I read somewhere that passing is a 50-55%. I think the USMLE website also states that passing requires 50-60% correct. 74% on UWorld very roughly correlates to high 240s on the real deal so while it's not an exact match, I would think 80% on the real deal should get you at least low to mid 230s.

Good points. Obviously I made assumptions that a passing score is 65%/194 and the highest was a score of 100%/275. I hope you’re right with the lower passing threshold - that would shift the scale favorably.
 
Is there evidence to suggest it is scored in that kind of linear fashion? I suspect it is but I haven't seen anything promising certain questions aren't weighted according to difficulty. Also I thought the test was out of 300. You know you've adjusted your expectations when you don't even know what 100% gets you hahaha
 
Is there evidence to suggest it is scored in that kind of linear fashion? I suspect it is but I haven't seen anything promising certain questions aren't weighted according to difficulty. Also I thought the test was out of 300. You know you've adjusted your expectations when you don't even know what 100% gets you hahaha
I think this is just a curve someone made up on reddit
 
0.6182.4285714
0.65194
0.7205.5714286
0.75217.1428571
0.78224.0857143
0.8228.7142857
0.82233.3428571
0.84237.9714286
0.86242.6
0.88247.2285714
0.9251.8571429
0.92256.4857143
0.95263.4285714
0.975269.2142857
1275
Just for fun - does anyone want to critique this table of % total correct on Step 1 and its corresponding three-digit score. This is accounting for the fact that 10% of the 280 are experimental question ... so the total number of scored questions become 252. I then assume that 65% (163.8 questions right) is necessary to pass Step 1 with a 194 and getting a 100% (252 questions right) would give you a score of 275. Between 163.8 and 252 is a total of 88.2 questions. Between 275 and 194 is a total of 81 points. This means that each question is roughly equal to 0.91 points. In other words, every 1% change in your amount correct roughly equates to a +/- of 2.29 to your three-digit score.
The error here is that USMLE is graded on a log scale rather than a linear one. Meaning low scores have bigger differences than high scores. The difference between a 210 and 220 or a 220 and 230 is bigger than 260 and 270 or 270 and 280 ect... Also USMLE's official max score is 300, it's just that nobody ever gets that score.
 
The error here is that USMLE is graded on a log scale rather than a linear one. Meaning low scores have bigger differences than high scores. The difference between a 210 and 220 or a 220 and 230 is bigger than 260 and 270 or 270 and 280 ect... Also USMLE's official max score is 300, it's just that nobody ever gets that score.
is it 300? always thought it was 280...cuz no one has gotten at/above 280 i think. plus the exam has 280 questions.
 
is it 300? always thought it was 280...cuz no one has gotten at/above 280 i think. plus the exam has 280 questions.
Yeah its 300. Its not a linear score. Like missing one could drop you from a 300 to a 280 but then it may take 3 more missed ones to go from 280 to 270. Its not just a straight shot
 
hahaha I need this, I set my alarm to 630 every morning but don't end up getting out of bed until 8
Same, had an alarm set for 7 and got out of bed at 9:30 ha. Every night I tell myself I won't do it, but I almost unconsciously turn off the alarm so it's clearly not effective haha. Then I'm all annoyed for the rest of the day because I'm like "I could've been done with xyz by now!". Life's rough.
 
im going to take my first NBME today. I have 13, 15, 16 17, 19 all the free one. I was just going to do 15, but is there any of those that would be better as a first time exam?
 
im going to take my first NBME today. I have 13, 15, 16 17, 19 all the free one. I was just going to do 15, but is there any of those that would be better as a first time exam?
I took 16 as a baseline, on the reddit predictor sheet it has the highest R2 I think? The curve on all of them sucks (I got like 80% correct and it was a 215). I did it pre-UWorld to get a true baseline.
 
So I was watching DIT and they gave a better explanation of capitation. Capitation seems to be when a physician is paid for a certain amount of time/number of patients (12 hour shift for an ER docs/ HMOs meeting certain numbers). I remember someone asking about this earlier and it confused me too, this makes more sense than the first aid explanation.
 
Kinda a bummer, but took NBME 21 today and got a 239. Last week on NBME 24 I got a 239 too 🙁
High 230s low 240s on new NBMEs should net you high 240s/250s on real deal. I know its frustrating to see the same score but it was only one week. My guess is youre in the 250s club
 
18 for sure. Do you plan to do UWSA 2 and free 120? If not idk if doing 3 more NBMEs would be worth your time imo since youve already done 4 and if you do one more youll have done 5 thats honestly plenty
yea i have time to take uwsa2 and free 120 like 5 days before my exam.
 
Jesus I failed. NBME 15 Equivalent to a 190. Since I have a 60th percentile in Uworld I'm kinda shocked. It had a lot of my weaker subjects, and I havent finished, neuro, started metabolism or biostats, but still this is awful. This is what doing 85% of Zanki gets me? Good God. Any advice is appreciated.
 
Jesus I failed. NBME 15 Equivalent to a 190. Since I have a 60th percentile in Uworld I'm kinda shocked. It had a lot of my weaker subjects, and I havent finished, neuro, started metabolism or biostats, but still this is awful. This is what doing 85% of Zanki gets me? Good God. Any advice is appreciated.
Good thing is 15 has one of the lowest correlations to Step 1 with an R of like .4 and UW % has the highest. My advice is to Prioritize doing new questions over Zanki (my personal opinion is doing UW and another bank is better than UW 2x) and try and check your breakdown in UWorld to see what your lowest percentile subjects are. Spend 1-2 days per week doing questions on only those weak subjects. Keep up anki on bugs and drugs since i think anki is actually really good for them. Whens your test
 
Jesus I failed. NBME 15 Equivalent to a 190. Since I have a 60th percentile in Uworld I'm kinda shocked. It had a lot of my weaker subjects, and I havent finished, neuro, started metabolism or biostats, but still this is awful. This is what doing 85% of Zanki gets me? Good God. Any advice is appreciated.

Old NBMEs don't really correlate so I wouldn't worry so much about the score. You already have identified your weak spots, so I bet if you work on those you will see a pretty big increase, especially neuro
 
Good thing is 15 has one of the lowest correlations to Step 1 with an R of like .4. My advice is to Prioritize new questions over Zanki and try and check your breakdown in UWorld to see what your lowest percentile subjects are. Spend 1-2 days per week doing questions on only those weak subjects. Keep up anki on bugs and drugs since i think anki is actually really good for them. Whens your test
Yeah I did notice that when I put it into the predictor that my score barely moved so that was kinda nice. I feel like I have to keep up with zanki, I just dont learn material better any other way, but luckily I get all my reviews done by noon everyday, and will have an extra 5 hours a night for content review or extra practice questions after today (still in class technically). My Step is July 16th, Comlex is July 2nd. Uword is 64% done and I've got 2/3 of kaplan to play with once I finish Uworld and start doing my in-corrects.

I'm really glad I finished my cards before I started this review, I would not have the motivation to finish after today's performance lol.
 
Yeah I did notice that when I put it into the predictor that my score barely moved so that was kinda nice. I feel like I have to keep up with zanki, I just dont learn material better any other way, but luckily I get all my reviews done by noon everyday, and will have an extra 5 hours a night for content review or extra practice questions after today (still in class technically). My Step is July 16th, Comlex is July 2nd. Uword is 64% done and I've got 2/3 of kaplan to play with once I finish Uworld and start doing my in-corrects.

I'm really glad I finished my cards before I started this review, I would not have the motivation to finish after today's performance lol.
Sounds like youre doing a lot of questions and thats good. If anki works for you then def do what works for you but I do believe the more questions the better and I think you have that covered
 
Top