Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
To see the application the way adcomms view it, go to Main Menu on the first page, click Print on the right, and check the PDF view. It will show paragraphs properly and allow for bullet point format (using a dash instead of a small round spot).
If the conferences are mentioned elsewhere you would not enter them again, unless you had a leadership or organizational role with a given conference, then you could use a Conferences Attended space to discuss that role.
Is the abstract pub med searchable and appearing in the regular issue of a paper journal? Or does it appear in a supplement to the journal?
Listing the most objective verifier is best. I like your last option the most.
Yes.
If you are sure of future involvement hours, consider using the Repeated feature to list completed hours up until today (June) and then the future date span , starting with June and ending at graduation. All the hours will appear in the header.
Were all the posters presented at your local school Research Symposium Day, or were some at Regional or National Conferences? Did any of the posters relate to the same data set?
Have two Research spaces, one for each school.
1) If your name is on the poster, you can still take credit for it, provided you give credit to the actual presenter. You need to be sure before including it, if it was presented in a 4th venue.
Yes, title yourself "Owner" or somesuch.
I would not list a 6 hour experience if you have no other dedicated shadowing to include in the same space. Aren't there any other purely observational times you can recall when just hanging out in the ER that you could carve out of your work hours?
In-person scribing should IMO be sufficient to cover shadowing, too, but all adcomms don't feel that way. So I think it's worth trying to shape a Shadowing entry, too. Whomever you have as Contact for the scribing might be used for the Shadowing space, too, if you give them a heads up. Alternatively, perhaps the nurse administrator or even an ED clerk might vouch for you.
Thank you! This was very helpful.
Yes. A faculty advisor for the group would work also.
1) Artistic Endeavor. You are the contact. Your title can be Owner. Don't waste characters on your EIN.
1) No adcomm will care about the name of the courses. A summary description like that in your first post is fine.
I agree with your comments.
Having two shadowing entries with one dedicated to a MM entry (if you need even more space) is fine. I'm not crazy about the two titles though. Maybe one could refer to the inclusion of multiple specialties in the space and the other state the one specialty of the MM doc?
You get about 65 characters for a space's name, so you're fine.
What did you present? Is it based on research or a project listed elsewhere?
1) How many years ago did you present this?
I'd care. I think it sounds interesting, but it might not do you any favors to have an interview derailed by talking about it in detail, if an adcomm brings it up, as it would take away from other important topics. Considering the brevity of your part of the talk, I suggest just leaving as you have it, but maybe instead of "AWRA", say "a national engineering conference" or somesuch that uses fewer spaces than the spelled out conference.
You could, but will it add substantially to your application? It might be worth including if you have nothing else in that category. Or, you might choose to include it just so adcomms know your plans for the next year.
