- Joined
- Jun 3, 2007
- Messages
- 4,694
- Reaction score
- 3,096
Worth 6 minutes of your time.
Worth 6 minutes of your time.
I'm sure he'll be locked up right after we get to the bottom of Hillary's emails.Worth 6 minutes of your time.
I thought she lost her career b/c how she came across and multiple critical statements. I would agree with the second part of that statement.
Does anyone else see Dr Fauci as the type of colleague that doesn't pull as much weight in the department b/c they are always working on a side project? And they seem pretty smart but seem to take the same material as you but wind up with a different conclusion. I don't personally know him (surprise), but he superficially strikes me as this "type".
Probably. I had heard that he hadn't had significant patient care for 30 years, so that fits! lolHasn’t he been the head of the department for 30 years or more?
I don't want any division head, highly published academic, nor chairman taking care of me or my family. I want the confident 5-8 year doc who is up to date on the literature, slick, and battle tested.Probably. I had heard that he hadn't had significant patient care for 30 years, so that fits! lol
Are you saying that supports my assessment, or not? (I am sincerely asking b/c it could go either way- I have seen many department heads who would fit my description). Personal story: I had to be put asleep emergently during residency. The guy I would have picked was taking care of me. Yay. In steps the department head, takes over and FUBAR'd the situation worse than a junior resident. He was neither smooth nor in. He almost snapped defeat from the jaws of victory.
Do you think concocting an antibiotic treatment plan for endocarditis translates to running the national pandemic response? I don’t see how patient care has any role in his job.I don't want any division head, highly published academic, nor chairman taking care of me or my family. I want the confident 5-8 year doc who is up to date on the literature, slick, and battle tested.
It does not. My response was to whom I would want (or in this case not want) to take care of me clinically. See above.Do you think concocting an antibiotic treatment plan for endocarditis translates to running the national pandemic response? I don’t see how patient care has any role in his job.
How do you think your gyn exam skills are these days? Probably pretty **** right because you haven’t done one in a long time because it isn’t part of your job any more. Does that make you a poor physician?I do think being a good physician versus a poor physician translates to running the national pandemic response. My money is on the good physician to outperform the poorly performing physician in essentially every life scenario. I may not always be right, but I will be right more often than wrong.
Why thanks for asking. My gyn exam skill are great these days. I practice as much as possible.How do you think your gyn exam skills are these days? Probably pretty **** right because you haven’t done one in a long time because it isn’t part of your job any more. Does that make you a poor physician?
That is exactly how he approached every issue since he started. And in retrospect, when he has been wrong (which indeed was numerous times), he has now acknowledged that he was wrong and/or explained the reasons why. All the idiots keep gleefully trying to celebrate a "gotcha" about Fauci and masks when in fact they should be lauding him for changing his stance as the evidence and expert consensus changed..... instead of stubbornly and wrongfully sticking to his guns..
My deal with Dr Fauci was him speaking in absolutes and condemning any other opposing ideas when he and everyone else had no way of knowing. I prefer the "That is an interesting point but here is why I believe I am right" approach.
Thanks for the reasonable response.Whatever agenda you have is causing you to project a version of Fauci who you think made a whole bunch of definitive statements, but who in reality hedged almost all the things he said as any scientist with limited information about a new phenomenon would do.
Don't believe me? Just look at this interview quote from March 2020.
---
MARGARET BRENNAN: You just- you just heard that report from our Liz Palmer about Italy. Are we on the same trajectory as Italy?
DR. FAUCI: No, not necessarily at all. I mean, obviously, things are unpredictable. You can't make any definitive statement. But if you look at the dynamics of the outbreak in Italy, we don't know why they are suffering so terribly...
---
---
MARGARET BRENNAN: Then it started spreading human to human. Is the virus mutating? Is it changing?
DR. FAUCI: Well, this is an RNA virus, MARGARET. And it always will mutate. The real question is so that people don't get confused. Viruses commute- mutate with no substantial impact on its function. So I have no doubt it's mutating as all RNA viruses mutate. We have not seen thus far any type of change in the way it's acting, but we are keeping a very close eye on it because it is conceivable that it could mutate and change some of the ways that it performs. But we have not seen that yet, but we're not going to just not pay attention to it. We're going to follow it closely.
---
---
“I fully expect — though I’m humble enough that I can’t accurately predict — that by the time we get to the fall that we will have this under control enough, that it certainly will not be the way it is now — where people are shutting schools,” Fauci said at the daily coronavirus briefing at the White House.
---
It doesn't make any sense to feel stupid for defending him. As you say, he discouraged masks at a time of a severe PPE shortage where masks were definitely needed by healthcare workers. It was also a time when the degree of asymptomatic spread was also unknown, and thus affirmatively advocating mask use wasn't necessarily justified.That is exactly how he approached every issue since he started. And in retrospect, when he has been wrong (which indeed was numerous times), he has now acknowledged that he was wrong and/or explained the reasons why. All the idiots keep gleefully trying to celebrate a "gotcha" about Fauci and masks when in fact they should be lauding him for changing his stance as the evidence and expert consensus changed..... instead of stubbornly and wrongfully sticking to his guns.
Thanks for the reasonable response.
I don’t have an agenda. I’m mainly irritated at defending him for 6+ months and feeling stupid in retrospect. Whether it was me telling people that he was telling them not to wear masks because he had other reasons (save them for hospitals). Or telling them he must have inside info on the lab. He has fooled me too many times and I’m irritated I looked stupid for defending the physician’s stance to everyday people.
He definitely didn’t have an easy position. But he has been different in many interactions than the exchanges above.
Couldn’t be more wrong. Public health and population based decisions are entirely different from everyday practice of medicine.Why thanks for asking. My gyn exam skill are great these days. I practice as much as possible.
But I think you are missing my point. Take any person in the same field. The person that is better is likely to be better in other areas of life. Not always true, but more often will be right. Take baseball. I will take the All-star MLB'er over the minor league bench player to win a basketball pickup game. I like the odds.
My deal with Dr Fauci was him speaking in absolutes and condemning any other opposing ideas when he and everyone else had no way of knowing. I prefer the "That is an interesting point but here is why I believe I am right" approach.
They specifically tried to bury this story of lab leak. I remember in march 2020 the epoch times made a documentary questioning the origins of the Wuhan Virus. It was well made and well researched and every single mainstream media did not cover the story. I remember I flipped channels for a week straight looking for the story. I knew it was a conspiracy because why would nobody mention this? Tucker Carlson mentioned it very very briefly in march 2020. Trump pissed many people off for calling it the "China Virus"Couldn’t be more wrong. Public health and population based decisions are entirely different from everyday practice of medicine.
The sudden hatred of Fauci by people is just politics, which is unfortunate. Dude had a very bad hand dealt to him with the pandemic and Trump, of course te a and opinions change as we learned more about Covid.
what we should be discussing is how the CDC as a whole has been weakened.
The “epoch times” is full of propaganda and conspiracy theories.They specifically tried to bury this story of lab leak. I remember in march 2020 the epoch times made a documentary questioning the origins of the Wuhan Virus. It was well made and well researched and every single mainstream media did not cover the story. I remember I flipped channels for a week straight looking for the story. I knew it was a conspiracy because why would nobody mention this? Tucker Carlson mentioned it very very briefly in march 2020. Trump pissed many people off for calling it the "China Virus"
Stopped reading right there.They specifically tried to bury this story of lab leak. I remember in march 2020 the epoch times
Sometimes we see what we want to see.Stopped reading right there.
Get help, man, get help.
This conspiracy theory happened to be Correctamundo.The “epoch times” is full of propaganda and conspiracy theories.
Nothing to see here. Move along.Sometimes we see what we want to see.
Im not denying the lab leak story, who knows. But I think any reasonable public health official would have done what Fauci did, accept the more plausible explanation. Frankly, even if the lab leak is true, I don’t see how that impacts any of our decisions for public health throughout the pandemic.
Umm...I disagree. A reasonable public health official would not have lied about gain of function research, would not have restarted it after the democratic presidency shut it down, and would not have pushed the "conspiracy" narrative when they knew there was a lot of truth to it.Sometimes we see what we want to see.
Im not denying the lab leak story, who knows. But I think any reasonable public health official would have done what Fauci did, accept the more plausible explanation. Frankly, even if the lab leak is true, I don’t see how that impacts any of our decisions for public health throughout the pandemic.
This is one of the worst cases of hearing hoofbeats and looking for zebras. As Stewart says, Hmm sounds like The Wuhan Corona Virus maybe originated from the Wuhan Virology Institute that studies, wait for it..... The Corona Virus!!!It surprises me that there is a mountain of evidence that the virus was created in a lab - and ZERO evidence that it came from nature...yet people still say...."well it could be either one. "
Exactly, it's a lot harder to bash the propaganda when the conspiracy is actually true.This conspiracy theory happened to be Correctamundo.
This is one of the worst posts I have seen on this site. ("everyone is worse for having read this. At no point did it make any sense. May God have mercy on your soul"- Abe Lincoln)Let’s assume it was created in a Chinese lab, intentionally altered to be virulent, and intentionally released on the world.
So what do you wanna do? Slap some more tariffs on them? Get the world trade organization to punish them? An angry letter from the UN? NATO attack? Shoot missiles? Scramble the jets? What the **** does it matter if any of this happened because China is immune to all consequences—they underpin the manufacturing and financial core of the first world and they know it. They already prop up a nuclear armed psychopath, hack our private and government sectors at will for money and trade secrets, and commit genocide in the open without consesequence. Why does it matter if they released covid and tried to kill everyone too?
This whole thing is being spun by the right as some sort of liberal coverup but it is more realistically a coordinated effort to keep Trump in the dark so he didn’t end the world by doing the above to look like the big man he has to be to his base. So if it’s true and it’s out now we’ll all just pretend it isn’t just like all the other **** China does because the alternative is much much much worse.
This is one of the worst posts I have seen on this site. ("everyone is worse for having read this. At no point did it make any sense. May God have mercy on your soul"- Abe Lincoln)
You are literally saying, "So what if China intentionally caused the deaths of millions? Let's do nothing because they may do worse." And you are saying you support a coordinated effort to keep the POTUS misinformed? You are endorsing evil through justification exercises. This is how evil grows in the world. (I will avoid the German soldier analogies since everyone misses the point)
(Disclaimer: this post is so out there that I will allow that you may be trolling or maybe I am missing your sarcasm)
Silver Lining: I believe your post can bring us all closer together by agreeing how off it is
Ok if you want to take that position answer the question—what do you think should be done? China is already executing millions of people through ethnic cleansing of the Uyghurs and Tibet and has empowered a madman to commit mass murder in North Korea and we have done nothing. Why is this different, because Americans died this time? Do you think less people will die if we start a war with a nuclear armed foe?This is one of the worst posts I have seen on this site. ("everyone is worse for having read this. At no point did it make any sense. May God have mercy on your soul"- Abe Lincoln)
You are literally saying, "So what if China intentionally caused the deaths of millions? Let's do nothing because they may do worse." And you are saying you support a coordinated effort to keep the POTUS misinformed? You are endorsing evil through justification exercises. This is how evil grows in the world. (I will avoid the German soldier analogies since everyone misses the point)
(Disclaimer: this post is so out there that I will allow that you may be trolling or maybe I am missing your sarcasm)
Silver Lining: I believe your post can bring us all closer together by agreeing how off it is
Yes, but none of this justifies blindly following the bs line that it had to be a rogue bat in the fields.Ok if you want to take that position answer the question—what do you think should be done? China is already executing millions of people through ethnic cleansing of the Uyghurs and Tibet and has empowered a madman to commit mass murder in North Korea and we have done nothing. Why is this different, because Americans died this time? Do you think less people will die if we start a war with a nuclear armed foe?
Yes, but none of this justifies blindly following the bs line that it had to be a rogue bat in the fields.
Is there evidence from someplace other than Tucker Carlson or the Epoch Times or Infowars that the virus was engineered by Chinese scientists?This is one of the worst cases of hearing hoofbeats and looking for zebras. As Stewart says, Hmm sounds like The Wuhan Corona Virus maybe originated from the Wuhan Virology Institute that studies, wait for it..... The Corona Virus!!!
The hoofbeats in this one are as loud as Secretariat winning the Belmont.
So why help other countries? Or others? Gotta take care of myself first....jus bein realistic. I like this argument style!hahaha
You should read up on history and see how much misery and death the united states has inflicted on the world. The cia alone is responsible for the destabilization of many countries and for many deaths. That's what happens when you're the hegemon, you can do as you like with no consequences. That post is just realistic.
Step 1. Don’t send the lab money. Would that be a good start?Ok if you want to take that position answer the question—what do you think should be done? China is already executing millions of people through ethnic cleansing of the Uyghurs and Tibet and has empowered a madman to commit mass murder in North Korea and we have done nothing. Why is this different, because Americans died this time? Do you think less people will die if we start a war with a nuclear armed foe?
You are responding to his reply that conceded that it was likely from the lab. In that line of discussion, you can’t concede the point then not concede it. That is intellectually disingenuous.You mean like how all the avian flus and pig flus happened? Or were all those also some kind of conspiracy by the chinese?
So that is the righteous retribution for crimes against the world, take away the labs money that they don’t need?Step 1. Don’t send the lab money. Would that be a good start?
I agree with most of this. But if I had to guess, I am betting it was from lab rather than wet market. There is no proof that neither way happened. The way that China covered it up and blamed the US military for starting makes me think that they are to blame more than anything.Is there evidence from someplace other than Tucker Carlson or the Epoch Times or Infowars that the virus was engineered by Chinese scientists?
I don't think it's crazy implausible that at some point a sample of the virus was being studied at the lab there - it actually seems pretty likely, the same way I'd expect to find samples of the virus at the CDC right now - but that's a far cry from "China engineered a bioweapon and let it loose for malicious or incompetent reasons".
And keep in kind that I already favor an emphatic "**** China" foreign policy on principle for all the other horrible evil things they do. I'm all for a scorched earth economic trade war and sanctions and middle fingers gratuitously extended at the UN, because **** the CCP and every corrupt antifreedom oppressive thieving genociding horse they rode in on. I'm not exactly an apologist or defender of that regime.
But I don't blame them for COVID, because I'm not a partisan Trump cultist hack.
Would that be a good start? Oh. You don’t even want to answer that. You would rather kowtow!So that is the righteous retribution for crimes against the world, take away the labs money that they don’t need?
I agree with most of this. But if I had to guess, I am betting it was from lab rather than wet market. There is no proof that neither way happened. The way that China covered it up and blamed the US military for starting makes me think that they are to blame more than anything.
Regardless, I don’t believe they unleashed it purposefully. They would release it from Europe or other place if they were intentionally doing it. They just most likely did it ineptly.
China, in their typically CCP-evil fashion, absolutely tried to cover things up early on, to the point of punishing their own doctors and scientists who said something was happening in Wuhan. They deserve blame and criticism for that. Alhough in truth, as contagious as this thing is, it seems like it wasn't containable at that point even if they'd been completely transparent.I agree with most of this. But if I had to guess, I am betting it was from lab rather than wet market. There is no proof that neither way happened. The way that China covered it up and blamed the US military for starting makes me think that they are to blame more than anything.
Regardless, I don’t believe they unleashed it purposefully. They would release it from Europe or other place if they were intentionally doing it. They just most likely did it ineptly.
I though everybody had gone 180 and it was now largely admitted that it was a leak from the lab (unintentional most probably) that just happens to study this virus and engage in gain of function studies.Was this an inept negligent lab accident, some kind of a bio-Chernobyl?
I though everybody had gone 180 and it was now largely admitted that it was a leak from the lab (unintentional most probably) that just happens to study this virus and engage in gain of function studies.
Kowtow instead of what? I think you understand that the alternatives are very drastic if we take them alone. We can’t physically attack China and our ability to financially attack them has been crippled by our diminished position in Asia (which Trump did nothing to help btw). We simply cannot do anything to them alone that would be of any real consequence without triggering an Armageddon. A viral release or a genocide it doesn’t matter—We know their government is evil we just can’t do anything to stop it. The rest of the world is in the same spot, they either need Chinese money or manufacturing manpower and doing anything that would result in losing those is not going to happen. Life goes on.Would that be a good start? Oh. You don’t even want to answer that. You would rather kowtow!
I am fine with pgg response to China that was posted above. You would rather take it