D
deleted641888
This is probably too controversial a topic for SDN, but given the current urgency of a pending execution (Julius Jones, whose deadline is today), I think it's worth an attempt at a meaningful discussion on here.
Article in question: Oklahoma executes inmate who dies vomiting and convulsing.
The ABA's position on our involvement in executions: Anesthesiologists and Capital Punishment.
A few questions come to mind for me, specifically regarding the meds:
- if not us, who pushes the meds (i.e., midazolam, vecuronium, potassium chloride)?
- who decides the dosages? 5 mg midazolam? 10 mg midazolam? 20 mg midazolam? 10 mg vecuronium? 20 mg vecuronium? How much potassium chloride is considered lethal?
- who decides which medications to use? Is midazolam enough of an amnestic to avoid "cruel and unusual punishment?" Should there be a hypnotic as well? Why vecuronium versus rocuronium?
When I see midazolam, I don't immediately think "convulsions" or "vomiting." Some would say you usually see the opposite reaction, which begs the question: which meds are being pushed when, and do they have somebody qualified enough to know the difference? Dubious, in my opinion.
I'm not looking to start a conversation about whether or not executions should exist in our judicial system, but I do wonder about the logistics in carrying out these executions "properly." We are arguably the most qualified profession to handle these medications (I gave all three meds at some point during a case last week), so if not us, then who? Is it considered an ethical obligation for us to make sure that these executions are carried out in a humane manner (which is a controversial statement in and of itself, I'm sure)? Before we go down that road, let me remind you that there have been plenty examples of wrongly convicted people sentenced to death, so I do think if we decide as a society that execution is an acceptable form of punishment, we need to go to great lengths to ensure that we do it without cruelty.
Edit: update regarding the Julius Jones case.
Article in question: Oklahoma executes inmate who dies vomiting and convulsing.
The ABA's position on our involvement in executions: Anesthesiologists and Capital Punishment.
A few questions come to mind for me, specifically regarding the meds:
- if not us, who pushes the meds (i.e., midazolam, vecuronium, potassium chloride)?
- who decides the dosages? 5 mg midazolam? 10 mg midazolam? 20 mg midazolam? 10 mg vecuronium? 20 mg vecuronium? How much potassium chloride is considered lethal?
- who decides which medications to use? Is midazolam enough of an amnestic to avoid "cruel and unusual punishment?" Should there be a hypnotic as well? Why vecuronium versus rocuronium?
When I see midazolam, I don't immediately think "convulsions" or "vomiting." Some would say you usually see the opposite reaction, which begs the question: which meds are being pushed when, and do they have somebody qualified enough to know the difference? Dubious, in my opinion.
I'm not looking to start a conversation about whether or not executions should exist in our judicial system, but I do wonder about the logistics in carrying out these executions "properly." We are arguably the most qualified profession to handle these medications (I gave all three meds at some point during a case last week), so if not us, then who? Is it considered an ethical obligation for us to make sure that these executions are carried out in a humane manner (which is a controversial statement in and of itself, I'm sure)? Before we go down that road, let me remind you that there have been plenty examples of wrongly convicted people sentenced to death, so I do think if we decide as a society that execution is an acceptable form of punishment, we need to go to great lengths to ensure that we do it without cruelty.
Edit: update regarding the Julius Jones case.
Last edited by a moderator: