Oklahoma - (Prospective) Class of 2010 part 01

[DMBFan61]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Speedo and I will be checking you guys in tomorrow morning. 🙂

As for the policy/ethical questions, it's more important to show you can think, not that you have the "right" answer.

Good luck!

not going to the 3 hr biochem festival, eh?

mucopolysaccharidoses get me all excited






not 👎

 

[Mr. Freeze]

I would say see you guys in the morning, but since I didn't put my name on passport photos or confirm receipt of my invitation, I wonder if I should just sleep in...How f'in AMATEUR can I be...I hand-delivered 'em (with name on paper, just not "on the back of each...")

I'll be the worried guy slippin' Amxcvbcv a 20-spot to open the velvet rope...

 

[Antigunner]

not going to the 3 hr biochem festival, eh?

mucopolysaccharidoses get me all excited






not 👎

I just hope it's as wonderful and extremely helpful as Steinburg's review... 😴

 

[Jalopycat]

Hmm. Those questions are difficult but fair. There really isn't a right or wrong answer. They probably just want to stretch your mind a bit and see how you respond under pressure. Interviews are tough, but medical school is even tougher. Nobody expects you to have all the answers.

Good luck with your interviews. They probably went/will go a lot better than you think.

 

[Doctor Bagel]

Hmm. Those questions are difficult but fair. There really isn't a right or wrong answer. They probably just want to stretch your mind a bit and see how you respond under pressure. Interviews are tough, but medical school is even tougher. Nobody expects you to have all the answers.

Good luck with your interviews. They probably went/will go a lot better than you think.

they are fair, and i guess they're the norm in lots of interviews, but i don't think they really assess who will be a good student or physician. my thing is that i want to be a clinician and see patients every day. how do my opinions on broad policy issues show how good or bad i'll be at that? since these questions are the norm, i'm wondering how good of a job we're doing evaluating future physicians.

 

[freesolo]

yea interviews today were as laid back as can be, no health care, and no ethical questions. It was mostly about me and my application. I didnt feel like they really knew my application that well, and their questions were really just off the top of their head, the interview was short like 35 min, so dunno if thats a good or bad sign. One guy had a 1 hour one, and got a buncha healthcare and ethical questions, felt bad for him. Its really what kinda draw u get, either u get the easy interviewers or the harder ones. After the interview the tours were cool, and alot more relaxed lol.

 

[Non-TradTulsa]

... Its really what kinda draw u get, either u get the easy interviewers or the harder ones. After the interview the tours were cool, and alot more relaxed lol.

Glad you had a good day, Abe - we were pulling for you. Now you can join the daily mailbox ritual. Congrats!

 

[Antigunner]

Any of you that interviewed today and took a tour with Ashley, I was the guy in the mod sitting at the computer wasting my time playing Sudoku instead of studying for finals...

 

[Amxcvbcv]

Any of you that interviewed today and took a tour with Ashley, I was the guy in the mod sitting at the computer wasting my time playing Sudoku instead of studying for finals...

I nominate Sudoku puzzles as the official time sink for the mod... at least for this test block, anyway. 😛

 

[Jalopycat]

they are fair, and i guess they're the norm in lots of interviews, but i don't think they really assess who will be a good student or physician. my thing is that i want to be a clinician and see patients every day. how do my opinions on broad policy issues show how good or bad i'll be at that? since these questions are the norm, i'm wondering how good of a job we're doing evaluating future physicians.

Questions on broad policy issues don't indicate the quality of a physician one will become. The problem is, anybody can fake empathy and caring during an interview. OU does a really good job of evaluating applicants, proven in the fact that they have a very high graduation rate. Patient contact starts on day one at OU, which makes each student even better prepared for the clinical years. When I was asked ethical questions at my interview awhile back, I expected it. I think they just want to see how well you think on your feet. When they are sorting through hundreds of applicants, all who look good on paper, unfortunately the interview becomes even more critical. Try not to stress. You sound very intelligent and I'm sure when you have your interview, you will convey your thoughts well.

 

[Mr. Freeze]

I am glad that is over...

That said, it was WAY more laid back than I thought it'd be. I felt like they each knew my AMCAS extremely well, and I was REALLY glad I had brushed up on it (i.e., I wrote what?). I felt like all I had to do was keep from drooling all over myself and everything would be fine. I was all ready to explain my lackluster MCAT and why I hadn't retaken it as of yet. In fact, although it snuck in as a loosely camoflaged query as to why I wanted to leave my current employment, I didn't get the classic "Why do you want to be a doctor?" I did get a few pokes with the policy stick, but my responses just happened to coincide with some admin work one of my board members is involved with. Not everyone was as lucky, or so I heard.

Here's to thick envelopes and cold beer...

Antigunner, was Ashley the short-haired blonde?

 

[freesolo]

i liked the mod with the poker theme lol, now thats my kinda mod! I hope hte mods are updated for the upcomin class, those things would be really good with some renovations

 

[Antigunner]

I would guess that yes, Ashley was the short-haired blonde one. We're both in the poker mod (232), along with Amxcvbcv, Speedo, lfesiam, and dmbfan61. The mods are great, but I would have to agree that with a bit of updating they would be even better. I don't know realistically how long that process will take. I think they're starting on it fairly soon, but I would imagine it might take awhile.

Sudoku is sucking my brains out... 🙄

 

[Jwax]

Wow, thank God that is over. Mailbox ritual, here I come! Amxcvbcv, it was nice to meet you! I was the girl at your table at lunch that said I use SDN. To throw in my two cents on the interview- I did not have the easy one that almost everyone else described. Maybe they didn't like me b/c another guy who was interviewed by the same group said they weren't that bad. Or maybe I just choked 😱 . Whatever- it is done. My med student's mod was sweet- there was definately a futon (sp?) in it!!! And the simulation center is the coolest thing ever. I like how there are like 15 new posts after this round of interviews was over. Ok, enough rambling. I am sure I did enough of that during the interview

 

[freesolo]

amxbcv who were u? I forgot you were giving us a tour lol, im horrible with names too, were u the one with the pink tie today? Or the guy with the brown shoes. Either way both of you were really nice, and honest.

 

[Doctor Bagel]

man, i'm feeling bummed that i'm the onlly person who got the harsh interview. i'm really wondering if i got it because i went to law school. maybe they thought i dug the policy stuff -- of course, if i did really dig it, i don't think i'd be applying to medical school.

congrats everybody else on your guaranteed acceptances! if you're an early interviewee with a good interview, there's no reason why you won't get in.

 

[Doctor Bagel]

Wow, thank God that is over. Mailbox ritual, here I come! Amxcvbcv, it was nice to meet you! I was the girl at your table at lunch that said I use SDN. To throw in my two cents on the interview- I did not have the easy one that almost everyone else described. Maybe they didn't like me b/c another guy who was interviewed by the same group said they weren't that bad. Or maybe I just choked 😱 . Whatever- it is done. My med student's mod was sweet- there was definately a futon (sp?) in it!!! And the simulation center is the coolest thing ever. I like how there are like 15 new posts after this round of interviews was over. Ok, enough rambling. I am sure I did enough of that during the interview

i must have skipped over your post, but i'm glad to hear that someone else didn't get the warm fuzzies. good luck to you, too!

 

[Doctor Bagel]

Questions on broad policy issues don't indicate the quality of a physician one will become. The problem is, anybody can fake empathy and caring during an interview. OU does a really good job of evaluating applicants, proven in the fact that they have a very high graduation rate. Patient contact starts on day one at OU, which makes each student even better prepared for the clinical years. When I was asked ethical questions at my interview awhile back, I expected it. I think they just want to see how well you think on your feet. When they are sorting through hundreds of applicants, all who look good on paper, unfortunately the interview becomes even more critical. Try not to stress. You sound very intelligent and I'm sure when you have your interview, you will convey your thoughts well.

my thing is that i'm totally cool with ethical questions like so and so comes into your office and has x-issue. how would you handle it? that's relevant because you are going to deal with that as a physician. it's also on a more small picture level, which good or bad is where i'm at (which is actually a big reason why my current job and being a physician are better fits for me than legal work). my questions were more broad and based more of what i would do if i had a policy job and not a physician's job. if i were applying to an mph program or a public policy program, they'd be completely relevant, but i'm not. 🙁

and yes, i do have sour grapes. it's human nature to think evaluative systems that favor you are better than ones that don't. 🙂

 

[Amxcvbcv]

amxbcv who were u? I forgot you were giving us a tour lol, im horrible with names too, were u the one with the pink tie today? Or the guy with the brown shoes. Either way both of you were really nice, and honest.

I didn't actually get to give tours yesterday. I was just there checking people in at the start of it all.

I would say my distinguishing characteristic is my wheelchair, but I did have on brown shoes. 😉

 

[Jwax]

i must have skipped over your post, but i'm glad to hear that someone else didn't get the warm fuzzies. good luck to you, too!

I read your other post about not feeling the love b/c your the only one who didn't get a nice, easy interview.... I was like, wtf? 😉 Yep, definately no warm fuzzies here. I told my folks about the lousy interview, and my dad gave me a lot of crap 😡 I was like, what happened to no matter how it turns out we love you and are proud of you?!? I guess that was just sentiment... whatever. I just thought this smiley was pretty kick ass, so I figured I'd include it. We'll find out how it all worked out soon enough.

 

[Doctor Bagel]

I read your other post about not feeling the love b/c your the only one who didn't get a nice, easy interview.... I was like, wtf? 😉 Yep, definately no warm fuzzies here. I told my folks about the lousy interview, and my dad gave me a lot of crap 😡 I was like, what happened to no matter how it turns out we love you and are proud of you?!? I guess that was just sentiment... whatever. I just thought this smiley was pretty kick ass, so I figured I'd include it. We'll find out how it all worked out soon enough.

i love that smiley! sorry you didn't get support from your dad -- that was very un-parent like on his part.

 

[mshheaddoc]

I know a few who interviewed at OU a few years ago and didn't get the warm fuzzies either. I think it depends on the interviewer and their mood, which since the interview is a huge component would kinda SUCK. After all the negatives, it makes me worried to begin the interview process at all! Its like luck of the draw if you get an easy or hard interview day. Or if someone wants to question all your EC's or what not. Or wants you to become a policy analyst for 5 mins.

 

[Non-TradTulsa]

Well, I'll join the anxiety-ridden crowd. I thought my interview was a great experience. Now I'm starting to think that they were just humoring me for an hour and that it was a "courtesy" interview. 🙁 I just can't go home from the office to check the mail today - I have to give a presentation tonight. The last two days I've gone home at lunch and my stomach has been in my throat. I wish I didn't know what the envelopes looked like - I may just keel over in the street by my mailbox and freeze or get run over!

BUT... seriously... you know, we don't know what happens behind closed doors at the admissions committee and we never will. It may be that an "easy" interviewer is critical of you in committee, whereas the "difficult" interviewer may have a policy of giving a stong thumbs-up as long as you didn't burst into tears (or burst into flames) while he was interviewing you.

We just don't know.... right? Take courage, friends - we just interviewed at a very fine medical school. Nobody can take that honor away from us.

 

[freesolo]

yea knowing what the letters looks like is probably one of the worst things. Does the waitlist letter come in like the rejected letter? Just so i know i might have a little hope when i get the thin letter

 

[Mr. Freeze]

Like NonTrad says, you can't judge whether you get in based on a feeling (one maybe only you have, unless maybe you had a bout of Tourette's, because let's face it, that's pretty obvious) of how your interview went. People who "did" well are looking for Plan B and people who think they assed it all up get in. We all have a good shot, just based on odds. I was happy to make the interview cut personally, I'll take 2 outta 3 anyday...

I'm glad my mailbox is down my driveway, cuz I think I'd wear a path if it were grass.

Exlawgrrl, I'd wager some of the policy pimping stemmed from your background. Don't sweat it.

 

[lfesiam]

yea knowing what the letters looks like is probably one of the worst things. Does the waitlist letter come in like the rejected letter? Just so i know i might have a little hope when i get the thin letter

Acceptance = GIANT RED ENVELOPE

Waitlist & Rejection = Normal Size Tan Envelope

gluck

 

[Jwax]

Acceptance = GIANT RED ENVELOPE

Waitlist & Rejection = Normal Size Tan Envelope

gluck

I really, truly wish I had not read this.



This is what will happen when I get to my mailbox. At least I live on a quiet street. I enjoyed all the comments about we don't know what the interviewers decide. I don't think my chances are ruined (I don't have Tourettes, nor did I burst into tears/flames hahaha), but I'm sweatin' it fo' shizzle. I think I will probably be commenting on here excessively until I find out!!!

I think this smiley (or is it smily? ehh...) will be my calling card:

 

[Antigunner]

I still haven't actually met any of you during your interview days, but more of you probably saw me. If you came into one of the mods while we were watching an Embryology lecture on the TV, I was one of the guys sittting at the desk (the other was Amxcvbcv). Hope you kicked butt in your interviews! 👍

 

[lfesiam]

haha antigunner i think i know who you are my 232 friend

 

[Quazimodo]

I was dissapointed with my interview experience. First of all, the 3 - on - 1 format stinks. It was obvious they had already decided what I was like before they met me, and they were more having a conversation between themselves with their questions than with me.

They asked me why I work so hard, and what's my purpose, to which I responded I like to challenge myself and experience as much as I can - I love to learn. They then proceeded to ask me some of the most convoluted hypothetical situation questions.. like what if you had a patient that had a hystorectomy, because they didn't want children, and then later the husband came wanting a vasectomy, how would you handle that? - The female doctor looked at me like this was a simple moral question, and I responded, that as a professional, I couldn't get involved in their personal lives, and there may be a simple explanation why he wants the procedure. She returned, of course there's a simple explanation, he wants a vasectomy so he won't get his girlfriend pregnant,.. I paused, and thought for a minute, and said that this was a difficult situation, and that I couldn't possibly get in the middle of the couple's marital problems, and the husband was in charge of his medical decisions. If he wanted a vasectormy, he'd get one and I couldn't stop him. I would only be able to educate him to the medical issues invovled, reversibiltiy, and implications. Then they all started in on me about preventing ALL pain and suffering. The questions got worse from there, and I began to feel like I was running for public office rather than applying for medical school. They wanted to know what my stance was on stemcell research, to which I said it was an exciting area of research - and things got more tense from there. They then wanted to know what I thought about cloning and abortion...

All in all, I'm a bit miffed. I think it's good to be challenged, but everyone else said they had positive interviews and great conversations. I don't know if I should complain about the way they handled it or what..., I had another interview yesterday, and expressed my concerns about the OU interview to the other school, and they agreed that the 3-on-1 format is a BIG problem, especially if they start ganging up on the applicant, and those questions were out of line. I don't care if they were just trying to challenge me, I thought it was unfair and a horrible way to be treated.

 

[Antigunner]

I was dissapointed with my interview experience. First of all, the 3 - on - 1 format stinks. It was obvious they had already decided what I was like before they met me, and they were more having a conversation between themselves with their questions than with me.

They asked me why I work so hard, and what's my purpose, to which I responded I like to challenge myself and experience as much as I can - I love to learn. They then proceeded to ask me some of the most convoluted hypothetical situation questions.. like what if you had a patient that had a hystorectomy, because they didn't want children, and then later the husband came wanting a vasectomy, how would you handle that? - The female doctor looked at me like this was a simple moral question, and I responded, that as a professional, I couldn't get involved in their personal lives, and there may be a simple explanation why he wants the procedure. She returned, of course there's a simple explanation, he wants a vasectomy so he won't get his girlfriend pregnant,.. I paused, and thought for a minute, and said that this was a difficult situation, and that I couldn't possibly get in the middle of the couple's marital problems, and the husband was in charge of his medical decisions. If he wanted a vasectormy, he'd get one and I couldn't stop him. I would only be able to educate him to the medical issues invovled, reversibiltiy, and implications. Then they all started in on me about preventing ALL pain and suffering. The questions got worse from there, and I began to feel like I was running for public office rather than applying for medical school. They wanted to know what my stance was on stemcell research, to which I said it was an exciting area of research - and things got more tense from there. They then wanted to know what I thought about cloning and abortion...

All in all, I'm a bit miffed. I think it's good to be challenged, but everyone else said they had positive interviews and great conversations. I don't know if I should complain about the way they handled it or what..., I had another interview yesterday, and expressed my concerns about the OU interview to the other school, and they agreed that the 3-on-1 format is a BIG problem, especially if they start ganging up on the applicant, and those questions were out of line. I don't care if they were just trying to challenge me, I thought it was unfair and a horrible way to be treated.

First of all, sorry that you felt your interview did not go well - I know from personal experience that its not a good feeling.

I think the reason they may have reacted so strongly to your responses is that we are learning basically the opposite of what you said. We are supposed to talk to patients about their personal lives, because every aspect of a person (physical, emotional, spiritual) can have a profound impact on their overall life. I have a feeling that this may be why they didn't like that particular response. As for stem cell research, you may have just gotten unlucky and gotten an interviewer that disagreed with you. Not a whole lot you can do there.

Regarding the 3-1 interview, I think different people just interview better in different situations. I had multiple 3-1 and 1-1 interviews, and I actually liked the 3-1 format a lot better. So while you may not have liked it, I don't think its at all fair to say that its a "BIG problem."

That being said, I wish you the best of luck with the rest of your interviews.

 

[Mr. Freeze]

I agree they seemed to have a general feeling before we sat down, but I wouldn't go so far as to say they'd decided already. Not that you did either 🙂

Unless someone else got the same ethical question, I saw your interview feedback and thought that was an interesting pickle to be in as a physician. I strongly agree that it isn't your place to impose morals. Maybe they're swingers. With the advent of HIPAA, spouses (and their doctors) can withhold information with unnerving tenacity; not that doctors always want to, but they have to. My dad has some pretty significant mental illness (think Beautiful Mind, only with pharmacology and not mathematics), but my mom is only as in the loop with his care as he wants her to be. It's like pharmacists not giving out BC pills because they don't agree with it; that isn't your place, just STFU and do your f'in job.

 

[Jwax]

I was dissapointed with my interview experience. First of all, the 3 - on - 1 format stinks. It was obvious they had already decided what I was like before they met me, and they were more having a conversation between themselves with their questions than with me.

They asked me why I work so hard, and what's my purpose, to which I responded I like to challenge myself and experience as much as I can - I love to learn. They then proceeded to ask me some of the most convoluted hypothetical situation questions.. like what if you had a patient that had a hystorectomy, because they didn't want children, and then later the husband came wanting a vasectomy, how would you handle that? - The female doctor looked at me like this was a simple moral question, and I responded, that as a professional, I couldn't get involved in their personal lives, and there may be a simple explanation why he wants the procedure. She returned, of course there's a simple explanation, he wants a vasectomy so he won't get his girlfriend pregnant,.. I paused, and thought for a minute, and said that this was a difficult situation, and that I couldn't possibly get in the middle of the couple's marital problems, and the husband was in charge of his medical decisions. If he wanted a vasectormy, he'd get one and I couldn't stop him. I would only be able to educate him to the medical issues invovled, reversibiltiy, and implications. Then they all started in on me about preventing ALL pain and suffering. The questions got worse from there, and I began to feel like I was running for public office rather than applying for medical school. They wanted to know what my stance was on stemcell research, to which I said it was an exciting area of research - and things got more tense from there. They then wanted to know what I thought about cloning and abortion...

All in all, I'm a bit miffed. I think it's good to be challenged, but everyone else said they had positive interviews and great conversations. I don't know if I should complain about the way they handled it or what..., I had another interview yesterday, and expressed my concerns about the OU interview to the other school, and they agreed that the 3-on-1 format is a BIG problem, especially if they start ganging up on the applicant, and those questions were out of line. I don't care if they were just trying to challenge me, I thought it was unfair and a horrible way to be treated.

I had the same hysterectomy/vasectomy question. I answered relatively the same way; although I don't have a problem talking about what consequences of cheating on his wife might have on his mental health, it isn't any of our business, as physicians (if they don't want to talk about it) and he gets the procedure if he wants it. I think interviewing in itself is a big problem... they should just make sure we speak English & let us in.

 

[lfesiam]

suck it up, complaining about it now won't help.

u think doctoring will be a smooth ride? heck no.

bad experiences will only make you better and stronger, learn from how you handle yourself through them.

enjoy your senior year and summer, do nothing and relax, trust me, you'll have a full plate...more like an overflowing well in medschool.

 

[Jwax]

suck it up, complaining about it now won't help.

u think doctoring will be a smooth ride? heck no.

bad experiences will only make you better and stronger, learn from how you handle yourself through them.

enjoy your senior year and summer, do nothing and relax, trust me, you'll have a full plate...more like an overflowing well in medschool.

It isn't easy to be a doctor???? 😱

Why did no one tell me???

Good experiences make you better and stronger, too.

Just joshing with ya. I knew going into the interview that the whole thing would suck. Maybe I just did the whole "self-fulfilling prophecy" thing. Eh, well. It is done. I am intending to both enjoying this year and the summer. Christmas would just be so much better if I got a big, red envelope from OU.

 

[speedo542]

i liked the mod with the poker theme lol, now thats my kinda mod! I hope hte mods are updated for the upcomin class, those things would be really good with some renovations

Like we've been saying all along. Mod 232 ROCKS!!!!!!!!!

 

[speedo542]

And I guess I will throw in who I am. If you interviewed on the 6th, I was the girl (with the other two studly men) checking you in. I also came into the lecture hall to see if everyone turned in their prereqs. You all were so nice, and looked slick (but I will add that a few looked like they could vomit)!! 😀

 

[kaykay73]

And I guess I will throw in who I am. If you interviewed on the 6th, I was the girl (with the other two studly men) checking you in. I also came into the lecture hall to see if everyone turned in their prereqs. You all were so nice, and looked slick (but I will add that a few looked like they could vomit)!! 😀

I saw all you guys checking us in on tuesday...im sure i looked like one of the ones who was gonna vomit or fall asleep. my interview went well...it wasnt super conversational or the easiest interview i have had by any means. they asked tough questions (nothing healthcare related or ethical...just kinda about my app) and i think i answered them ok but we will have to see. i'm glad to be finished with interviews for a while...although the stress of waiting is almost just as bad... good luck to everyone and hope that our christmas presents are just big red envelopes!!

 

[Jwax]

good luck to everyone and hope that our christmas presents are just big red envelopes!!

That would be the best xmas gift ever!!! So, I just wanted to throw out there that I am really proud of myself. Want to know why? I have managed to keep myself from checking the mail either yesterday or today. Since my interview was on the 6th, I know I won't be getting anything until at least this weekend, probably later. So YAY me for not checking too early. 👍

 

[Jwax]

I saw all you guys checking us in on tuesday...im sure i looked like one of the ones who was gonna vomit or fall asleep. my interview went well...it wasnt super conversational or the easiest interview i have had by any means. they asked tough questions (nothing healthcare related or ethical...just kinda about my app) and i think i answered them ok but we will have to see. i'm glad to be finished with interviews for a while...although the stress of waiting is almost just as bad... good luck to everyone and hope that our christmas presents are just big red envelopes!!

I just looked at your profile & realized who you were. I am the one that was talking to ya during the simulation & throughout the rest of the day. Good luck and ya better post your results 🙂

 

[Mr. Freeze]

I normally place no faith in 'em, because they always say "You'll find the husband of your dreams." or something like that, but I got a fortune cookie today that said "You are about to be rewarded for your hard work."

I think the Chinese writing on those things says something like Happy Cookie, or Introspective Cookie, or maybe ****ty Tipper Cookie. I think there is bin back there marked Expecting a Life Changing Event Cookie, and they throw a few out each day to make random people like me happy.

 

[kaykay73]

I just looked at your profile & realized who you were. I am the one that was talking to ya during the simulation & throughout the rest of the day. Good luck and ya better post your results 🙂

haa..weird. it was nice to meet you and good luck to you also.

 

[glp]

i keep trying to stay away, but sdn sucks me back in. though my interview was pretty chill, i did get a quiz at the end of my interview. one of the interviewers was like "i am going to say some words and i want you to tell me the first thing that comes to your mind."
interviwer: "henry bellmon"
me: "former oklahoma governor."
interviewer: "anything else you know about him."
me (thinking $hit did he do something for medicine i dont know about): "sorry, not really."
interviewer: "thats fine, what about kofi annan?"
me: "un secretary general, recently catching alot of slack for iraq and oil for food."
interviewer: "good, what about donald rumsfeld?"
me (i speak before i think): "not a big fan."
two of the interviewers laugh, the one quizzing me just kind of looks and smiles.
interviewer: "ok ill move on then, what about ramsey clark?"
me: "i have no clue"
i guess he quizzed everyone that morning. even being on my best behavior i still couldnt help myself when i got the chance to voice my disdain for the bush administration. que va.

 

[Antigunner]

George W. Bush: great president... or the greatest president?

-Steven Colbert, the Colbert Report

 

[Amxcvbcv]

I love The Daily Show and all of its current and former correspondents. I haven't had the time to watch it as much as I used to for obvious reasons, though. 🙁

Jon Stewart is one of my favorite people on television.

 

[freesolo]

i like the daily show too, i tried to stay away as far as possible from politics/religion in the interview lol. South Park is great too, ive just begun watching it, like 3 shows so far and theyve been funny as hell. I always like how they have some political agenda fit into the show lol, and they'll make fun of everyone, no discrimination with them lol.

 

[speedo542]

George W. Bush: great president... or the greatest president?

-Steven Colbert, the Colbert Report

Are you serious???

 

[Antigunner]

Are you serious???

You obviously haven't seen the show...

 

[glp]

the mail man left me a little treat in the my mailbox today. boo-yah. 😀 hope everyone else gets a nice red envelope soon. the letter was dated 12/8, so i guess they went out yesterday. i have the day off, im not sure what to do now.

 

[Amxcvbcv]

the mail man left me a little treat in the my mailbox today. boo-yah. 😀 hope everyone else gets a nice red envelope soon. the letter was dated 12/8, so i guess they went out yesterday. i have the day off, im not sure what to do now.

Congratulations!

Celebrate and relax! You've earned it. 🙂