Online Deg Program thru Accredited Uni

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
My husband is currently taking online courses through a cc to earn his AA before transferring to a 4 year. There are no proctored tests for any of his classes. The only thing keeping him from cheating is his sense of honor. So I see why some schools might worry about this.

lol +1. There is no way to know what level of proctoring went on in each schools online course (Adcoms get apps from 100s of schools).

I also have taken a few online classes (via 4yr Univ). As far as involvement, required effort, and amount learned, they are the worst classes I've ever had. (btw, we showed up at a site to test, like for the MCAT). I have a friend who has been doing this for years, they are low yield and horrible in so many ways.

Seriously you guys have to be kidding about these classes. Some Adcom people don't like CC classes, as if online is going to pass for them...👎

___________________

Jl lin,

I had to respond to this post for so many reasons!

No offense MCAT, but a good part of your position holds as much water as a butterfly net. Again, do more research before you are fast and furious to agree or disagree.
Lol. You keep telling people to research. Where? Why?

I have better things to do.

The coursework requirements are the coursework requirements. If they are the exact same as those schlepping to each and every class w/ azz in seat and both students do the required coursework, that is exactly the same, based on curriculum and program requirements, it's the same DAMN degree.
Again, competitiveness matters. I know Adcoms that specifically watch if you take harder pre-reqs at CC. Most everything is scrutinized once you're in position to get an interview/acceptance.

Real world experience >>>>>>>>>>>> Research

I'm talking about MD admissions, as I've always said.

If you are starting from jump street, NO. The reputable online degree completion programs offered by the B&M schools aren't going to work. They are NOT going to let you in anyway.

Look at the examples I spoke of earlier with regard to becoming a RN or a NP. You can't start from zilch for either of those with an online program. Even these completion programs have some campus and clinical and presentation practice requirements for those that have already passed their boards and have worked as RNs!!!!!!!!!
You aren't gonna get in with zilch!!!! That's not what the good B&M schools designed these programs for.

OMG, now I'm getting such a H/A.
Most of your posts: tldr

tldr.jpg
 
I am so tired of saying this, and life goes on, so I won't fight this forever.

It ALL DEPENDS ON THE PROGRAM...............


100:1 IF the B&M program that is offering online options for degree completion is issuing the same degree as what's on campus, YES. Tests will be proctored. I can tell you from taking courses at two HIGHLY RESPECTED UNIVERSITIES.

The writing intensive stuff, listen, if you are using someone else to do your work, it's set up so eventually you WILL GET CAUGHT. Academic honesty and integrity is vital. You sign your life away like you do when you getting a freaking mortgage when you do these kinds of programs. If you haven't, then you took courses from some shoddy or off-the-wall or under-the-radar programs--not excellent ones.

There's a lot more reasons I could talk about, but seriously, why should I do other people's research when I have things to do?



If you are NOT considering doing anything this route, OK then. It would seem you wouldn't want to spend the time to do indepth research. Alright then. So be it. But then you have to keep your lips together or limit your finger movement on the keyboard, b/c if you don't do this work and due diligence, here's the things some just won't like, but it has to be said, you are making hasty generalizations and drawing conclusions and, well, speaking out of ignorance.

And that is how BIAS forms--OUT OF SHEER IGNORANCE. Doesn't make anyone stupid necessarily, it just shows that have not done the diligence needed to truly make an educated opinion on this issue.

And this has little to do with going through the application process by way of a small pool of experiences. The application process is what it is, and it is a separate matter.

To get to an interview, you are basically looking at MCAT scores and good GPA from a reputable program. When the REPUTABLE PROGRAM offers the same degree as what has been offered fully on campus, it doesn't matter. It is the same damn degree. Mind you, it will probably involve activities, courses, and other such things that are NOT done online. So really the idea of obtaining such degrees fully online is a misnomer.


I keep forgetting that the pre-med syndrome mentality will pop up often here at SDN. I guess I just expected it more from youngsterz (18, 19, 20, 21 y.os) and not NTs. I expect NTs to have learned to be more openminded, to limit unfair commentary without doing the due diligence, and to just to be more progressive-minded in terms of thinking outside the box and assembly line mentality.

I am sorry, but it really disturbs me that people insist on perpetuating myths w/o doing due diligence.

I could, again, go to a TOTALLY B&M school like "South Hampton Institute of Technology." If it is not reputable, does not have good oversight w/ strong faculty and program development, and sound regional and professional accreditation, IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT IT IS AN ONLY B&M SCHOOL.

Ding. Ding. Ding. Guess what? Same thing with the programs that are degree completion that use a good amount of online work for program delivery.

When you are talking B&M on campus or B&M online delivery or even considering something not part of a reputable B&M program, YOU HAVE TO DO YOUR DUE DILIGENCE. People ideally do this when shopping for a car, a house, decently made shoes and clothes. WHY IN THE WORLD SHOULDN'T THEY OR WOULDN'T THEY DO WITH THEIR EDUCATION!!!!!!!!



The argument about cheating is misleading b/c CHEATING CAN OCCUR IN ANY VENUE, AND IT DOES--on campus--on exams--on whatever. Sad thing about human beings. They can lie and cheat.

No one is showing at all that those that achieve degrees from reputable B&M's with sound online delivery sytems are more prone to cheating. Trust me. If they are going to confer a degree to you from their instution, they are going to do their due diligence with you too if it a strong school with a good reputation to tarnish. Schools' reputations are THEIR MEAT AND POTATOS. Schools should and do have loftier ideals in terms of their mission and purpose, but the bottom line is that they are still businesses, and they want to make money. Also, if they receive gov't funds, they want to keep that funding rolling in. They will take very serious measures in protecting this.



Also, again, the sheer volumn and pickiness of writing intensive work for these makes it hard for students to pay others to do the work for them. Your style and approach or variants to it will be picked up eventually. And unless you pay someone A TOTAL BOAT LOAD of money, they are NOT GOING TO DO ALL THIS WORK FOR YOU--plus worry about the problems with interaction during practicums, office time w/ profs, variations in email correspondence, on line and RL discussions, or the like. It is so voluminous, eventually such a cheater will get caught and DISMISSED. The amount of folks that would slip through this would be virtually the same as the amount that would slip through with fully on-campush students. The reputable B&M, well established schools that set these programs up take great things to mix things up and make cheating very tough--and it is b/c they are conferring the SAME DEGREE as the all on-campus counterpart. You think they want their regional accreditaion or professional accreditations ripped away? They are a pain in the azz for a reason.

How many folks out there are cheating on their dissertation work? It's a similar thing with the B&M's reputable online programs. MUch of that work is highly autonomous. Yes you have to meet with your advisors, professors and such regularly, etc. The good programs I speak of expect this in their programs as well.

People cheat in every venue or delivery system. Once more, some of us are NOT talking about mills or shoddy programs. In fact, I wouldn't attend a program that was truly 100% online and didn't come out of a highly reputable B&M schools with the same amount of oversight and the same professors and program/curriculum requirements. I NEVER have supported doing that.



But again, sadly, cheating happens everywhere. In reality, it catches up with the cheater, thus the old adage from teachers when we were in grammar school, "If you cheat, you are only hurting yourself " is quite true. I will share something else.

I knew a guy that was able to get another person to go in and take the ACT for him. This dude killed the ACT for the other person. Eventually, however, the other person's coursework had an overall and downward trend that didn't fit with his ACT score.

Just as people can break into "secure" systems--and some of them incredibly secure through the Internet,
so,people can find ways to cheat. Welcome to human nature and the real world.

You should NOT, however, draw generalizations and attempt to make them the rule by way of the few acceptions.


And I wonder that some folks are holding an unfair grudge b/c they actually believe people in reputable schools that use online delivery systems, that the students are NOT working as hard for their degree (or did not) as others. In the right and reputable B&M programs this is FAR from the truth. Time spend doing the work and the same, if not at times tougher work--b/c research-based writing intensive programs can be quite the bear is a lot of work. With research-based writing you are constantly reviewing, hopefully applying, and then documenting and citing over and over and re-writing, re-writing, and re-writing. It is a lot of work.

I teach and tutor people. One brilliant Math major that I tutored in English and writing courses couldn't believe how painstakingly involved and downright hard these courses were. One this is true. They are very time-consuming if you plan to do very well in them.


Please don't make unfair conclusions about things how have not done your due diligence on and then post them as if they are Gospel. When and if you do enough research, you will end up eating your words.

Otherwise, continue to think with whatever bias you prefer. Just don't keep posting this bias as if it were the unchangeable, eternal truth of the universe.



Actually Cook has a point, even though she didn't post it as delicately as possible. I think what she is referring to is the whole pre-med syndrome that apparently controls the thinking of those that are NT as well as those that aren't.
 
Last edited:
My husband is currently taking online courses through a cc to earn his AA before transferring to a 4 year. There are no proctored tests for any of his classes. The only thing keeping him from cheating is his sense of honor. So I see why some schools might worry about this.




Sigh. Again, it depends. Are they writing intensive courses? If so, you wouldn't necessarily need a lot of proctored tests. It depends on the courses, how the professor has set them up, etc. There are courses like this in B&M that don't require proctored tests. I have taken them. If his courses are pretty much writing intensive in nature, whether a course is through direct delivery at a B&M on campus or not, the professor may have not seen the need for proctored tests. Many times quizzes and tests are given as learning tools in and of themselves. In certain courses, the reflection as to understanding is in the writing or other kinds of presentations. You are constantly being tested by way of what and how you communicate an understanding of things.

Actually basing most of a student's grade on pre-developed tests is easier for professors and TAs. I think reading through written work for evaluation is a lot tougher than running a test through a computer with an answer key and logging the grade. I am not saying there isn't a place for these tests. Indeed there is. But it is by far not the only type of assessment, and neither is it the best kind of assessment for certain kinds of courses and coursework.
 
Jeez. You've turned irrational about this. As for your cheating comment, it simply isn't true. Proctored vs non-proctored makes mountains of difference when it comes to cheating.

Like I said, if you can avoid online, avoid it. If you can't, then deal with the fact that there are possible consequences. The moment a topic creates a lot of controversy (like this), this is the way to go about it. How is this bad advice? Just accept that if you took online classes (at even the most reputable site) some will question it.
 
Jeez. You've turned irrational about this. As for your cheating comment, it simply isn't true. Proctored vs non-proctored makes mountains of difference when it comes to cheating.

Like I said, if you can avoid online, avoid it. If you can't, then deal with the fact that there are possible consequences. The moment a topic creates a lot of controversy (like this), this is the way to go about it. How is this bad advice? Just accept that if you took online classes (at even the most reputable site) some will question it.


To the latter sentence. . .anyone on an ad com can pretty much question anything they want, unless it smacks of an EEOC violation. JUST LIKE IN JOB INTERVIEWS. Problem is, people aren't looking at this process as being very much like a professional job interview that is an ongoing process. All through every phase of the process you KEEP interviewing and proving yourself, etc.
This does not at all shock me. This is normal in the professional world.


Please, would you show which/what is irrational about what I've said?



I NEVER said proctored vs non-proctored doesn't make a difference. Where did you pull that out of? Wow.

What I said is there are all kinds of ways to assess learning. Some profs develop their courses using quizzes and such as learning tools for students. So they don't weigh that much in the grade. The various writing/research assignments do--as well as active written communication and a number of other things.

NOT every course requires much if any proctored tests, whether it is given on campus or off campus. (For the last time, I'm not talking about pre-req science courses with labs or course requirements for practicums. Practicums can't and shouldn't be done on line. I keep repeating this, b/c some folks don't seem to separate that out of what I said. It's like their approach to discussion is throwing all the noodles in the pot without separating the capellini from the rigatoni from the ravioli from the stuffed spinach tortillini from the conchiglioni and whatever else is mixed into it.)



Please don't distort someone's POV. Better to seek clarification first. That's the way to go.

Eg.: Please share what parts of what I have written that are irrational. I am not clear on that, b/c you didn't show it.

See how communication is more difficult than we realize?
 
Last edited:
You're irrational because you're unwilling to listen to the alternative point of view and unwilling to acknowledge anything that may be perceived contrary to your point. For example, I say that it is best not to do things that will be questioned by ADCOMS. You respond by saying they will always question everything. Should I follow this to the logical conclusion that you imply where you might as well do anything (e.g. get a low GPA) because they will question something anyway?

Your second irrational comment is your insistence over courses being equal when proctoring issues are present. Are we to really believe that a proctored vs non-proctored exam is the same thing? Are we to believe a cheater student that has taken 10 courses proctored vs 10 non-proctored will have the exact same opportunity to cheat? You then say on campus tests don't require much proctoring either. I doubt anyone here in a classroom B&M University test has ever had their test without the professor present. That is called being "proctored." Even if you are to cheat because the professor is a *****, it can't be done as blatantly as when it isn't proctored.

Communication is difficult here because one party (you) don't listen.
 
You're irrational because you're unwilling to listen to the alternative point of view and unwilling to acknowledge anything that may be perceived contrary to your point.

No. That is your interpretation of the transaction. You have not demonstrated my position as irrational. Wow.


For example, I say that it is best not to do things that will be questioned by ADCOMS. You respond by saying they will always question everything. Should I follow this to the logical conclusion that you imply where you might as well do anything (e.g. get a low GPA) because they will question something anyway?

Low GPA IS NOT THE SAME. Compare similar with similar. That's a bizarre reach and is really unworthy of an intelligent response in my view. Wow, again.

Your second irrational comment is your insistence over courses being equal when proctoring issues are present. Are we to really believe that a proctored vs non-proctored exam is the same thing? Are we to believe a cheater student that has taken 10 courses proctored vs 10 non-proctored will have the exact same opportunity to cheat? You then say on campus tests don't require much proctoring either. I doubt anyone here in a classroom B&M University test has ever had their test without the professor present. That is called being "proctored." Even if you are to cheat because the professor is a *****, it can't be done as blatantly as when it isn't proctored.

Communication is difficult here because one party (you) don't listen.

I never said on-campus courses don't require much proctoring. I said whether a prof uses protoctored exams on campus or online depends on the kind of course and the prof's sense of how to assess understanding.

If you think always taking multiple choice tests are the best and highest standard of assessment FOR ALL KINDS OF LEARNING, you are terribly misled.

You aren't really understanding what I have written.

No sir. Communication is difficult b/c you are so fixed on point that you are not READING CORRECTLY. Please slow down and go back again and read what I said about various kinds of learning assessment--and try to do so untangled by your own foregone conclusions and bias.

It is like what I said completely went over your head.

Wow for the third time.
 
Is it some kind of faux pas to quote yourself?



Stop it. You know the person did not read what I had written. It's obvious in his responses. It's like trying to "take point" with a pinecone rather than a hand grenade.


If people don't read, but forge head anyway with their insistence, it's like this:

:bang::bang::bang::bang:






Basically there position goes like this: :boom:



As for me I am now past this: :diebanana:and this: :bang:


And am now like this:


:shrug::whistle:


Irrational is pushing against points that have NOT even been stated and then continuing to argue them.


Ridiculous.
 

jl lin - I actually do read what you write as I think you bring great points to the threads, but between the shifting fonts, font sizes, bold, italicized, bold and italicized, odd paragraph spacing, etc., reading your longer posts becomes something just this side of the Bataan Death March. For the love of God, boil it down, use standard paragraph formatting and limit yourself to one or two bold phrases. More people would tune in. When you get a tl;dr around these parts, there are 20 others who thought the same thing and just aren't snarky, mean or snarky and mean enough to say it. Make it easy for everybody to digest what you're serving. You need to be more Ruth's Chris Steakhouse, less El Bulli, to make a needlessly-gastronomic metaphor.
 
jl lin - I actually do read what you write as I think you bring great points to the threads, but between the shifting fonts, font sizes, bold, italicized, bold and italicized, odd paragraph spacing, etc., reading your longer posts becomes something just this side of the Bataan Death March. For the love of God, boil it down, use standard paragraph formatting and limit yourself to one or two bold phrases. More people would tune in. When you get a tl;dr around these parts, there are 20 others who thought the same thing and just aren't snarky, mean or snarky and mean enough to say it. Make it easy for everybody to digest what you're serving. You need to be more Ruth's Chris Steakhouse, less El Bulli, to make a needlessly-gastronomic metaphor.

Devil is pretty much always in the details. When things have to be repeated b/c someone jumps but doesn't read or ask for clarification, it is exhausting...for everyone.

People can believe whatever they want. But when they make statements as if they are absolutes and musts, w/o being more fully informed, it leads to more mass ignorance...b/c many people just buy into what those people keep saying. Please note that I have not taken an absolute position here. You restated some of it's essence earlier.

No worries pons. I apologize if I sound snarky. It's just that some make arguments against
something I haven't even said--and the particulars of what I have said, they didn't read or bother to consider.

I think there is some agreement here regarding being careful about this delivery mode, but it would be so wrong to throw the baby out with bath water.


I will say some of the sentences in your last reply aren't clear, but it
doesn't matter. I'm done here. 🙂
 
Last edited:
Thank you SDN for these threads.

This is srs bsns!!!!!!
 
Stop it. You know the person did not read what I had written. It's obvious in his responses.
Ridiculous.

Can hardly blame him when your posts are several pages long!

This post is very amusing for some very passionate for others!
 
Can hardly blame him when your posts are several pages long!

This post is very amusing for some very passionate for others!

I post occasionally, and I lurk on study breaks sometimes or when I am between blocks. I have one major question for these long post posters:

How the heck do you have the time to invest in this? These are some crazy long posts and there are a TON of them by some of you? Where do you get the time in your post-bacc studies, medical school or pre-med studies etc. etc. ? I am envious of your obvious additional hours in the day that provide you with the ability to post like this! I would love to take that kind of extra time and take a nap (honestly)!
 
double post
 
Last edited:
I post occasionally, and I lurk on study breaks sometimes or when I am between blocks. I have one major question for these long post posters:

How the heck do you have the time to invest in this? These are some crazy long posts and there are a TON of them by some of you? Where do you get the time in your post-bacc studies, medical school or pre-med studies etc. etc. ? I am envious of your obvious additional hours in the day that provide you with the ability to post like this! I would love to take that kind of extra time and take a nap (honestly)!



If you took typing or have somehow learned it, you can quickly knock it out. Has nothing to do with a lot of extra time. I haven't got it. But I can take breaks and type fast. Of course unless you learn typing for a business secretarial job, you may be like me. That is, you can type fast but not always accurately. I learned it in HS b/c I knew I was going to college and writing would be a big part of my education.

If you can type at 60-70 WPM, it's no biggie.

Meanwhile, I don't get too bothered by such responses. When people have something to say that is to the issues at hand, and they can make balanced, solid arguments, they don't have to attack people personally. But I'll make points when I feel something has been misrepresented. . .yep. . .up to a point. Then I tire of it and just don't give a flying feces. It's sad to me--the the idea that a few were so insistent in their positions w/o all the facts and perspectives. A lot of bias went into the formulation of some of their responses. It's very misleading to folks that flip through the threads. Such imbalanced views strike me as quite unfair.


I'm over it.
 
MCAT guy your posts are frikkin gold. I dont know where you come up with all the sick/hilarious pics, but damn son. damn. Was it you with the Antoine Dodson URM one? haha love it.
 
MCAT, whatever. Posting trying to be cute does not make any valid points. It's just you trying to be cute and very pro-pre-med syndrome.

My bad for forgetting the whole pre-med mentality thing. Your little comic clip is also a great shot of MANY students on campus with their laptops. Actually, its quite true for many. That helps make my point.

Thanks for continuing to prove Cook's point as welll. (Geez I thought she was being tough on people. Apparently not.)
 
It's sad to me--the the idea that a few were so insistent in their positions w/o all the facts and perspectives. A lot of bias went into the formulation of some of their responses. It's very misleading to folks that flip through the threads. Such imbalanced views strike me as quite unfair.


I'm over it.

I'm glad you are. More than a few posters in this thread would probably like to hold up a mirror to the above comment and let you get a long, hard look at it. Something about a pot and a kettle...
 
I'm glad you are. More than a few posters in this thread would probably like to hold up a mirror to the above comment and let you get a long, hard look at it. Something about a pot and a kettle...




K Pons. Here's the thing. Ditto. Projection.

Be open to all perspectives before making hasty generalizations. That is the true moral of this story. Unfortunately for some, it's miffed time, b/c to them it's about a pizzing contest. I don't care about that. I care about balance and getting to the truth.

I have the discipline to not return to this thread, since I perceive it has become about being or thinking one is "right," rather than looking for a balanced truth.

People need to do their due diligence when looking into employing this medium to continue their education. Lab courses are out IMHO even with virtual labs. Same thing w/ courses with practicums. Research here is the key.

May this thread RIP.
 
I have the discipline to not return to this thread, since I perceive it has become about being or thinking one is "right," rather than looking for a balanced truth. ....

May this thread RIP.

Jl, There is no way that you will fail to keep going till you get the last word. You can't even write the last paragraph to your own book-length posts.
 
I have the discipline to not return to this thread, since I perceive it has become about being or thinking one is "right," rather than looking for a balanced truth.

Which is why you keep replying. Because you think you are "right," which honestly I think you are for the most part. But damn if you don't call out others for for their closed-mindedness for the crime of thinking they are right about something, and then in the next breath write four paragraphs about how right you are. Cognitive dissonance or something it's called. It's ok to disagree. You keep beating it to death because you think you're right. And that's ok; it's just also ok for Ed or me to do the same thing. And some, mainly me, get our kicks by meeting sanctimony with sarcasm. So here's your cookie...
chocolate_chip_cookie.jpg
 
Jl, There is no way that you will fail to keep going till you get the last word. You can't even write the last paragraph to your own book-length posts.




Which is why you keep replying. Because you think you are "right," which honestly I think you are for the most part. But damn if you don't call out others for for their closed-mindedness for the crime of thinking they are right about something, and then in the next breath write four paragraphs about how right you are. Cognitive dissonance or something it's called. It's ok to disagree. You keep beating it to death because you think you're right. And that's ok; it's just also ok for Ed or me to do the same thing. And some, mainly me, get our kicks by meeting sanctimony with sarcasm. So here's your cookie...
chocolate_chip_cookie.jpg


OK. OK, but I just couldn't pass these up:


www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ0sDES7Dpc



www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sMFN69l_ZY&NR=1


Kind of sounds a little like Ben Stein. . .:laugh:
 
Last edited:
Just trying to lighten things up a bit.

Nothing you couldn't see just about any day at the zoo. I actually thought the first one was the cutest.:laugh: It really sounds like he is talking and saying, "Wow."

Nice hairdo on your guy. lol
 
Yea I hate Spam. How is it even a little bit edible?


:spam::barf:
 
Top