Opening a can of worms/beating a dead horse

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Perrotfish

Has an MD in Horribleness
10+ Year Member
Joined
May 26, 2007
Messages
8,224
Reaction score
4,551

Members don't see this ad.
Definitely today there are scientific advancements from all around the world. :thumbup: Are you saying that much of what we know today was not built on scientific principals developed in Europe and N. America from 1600-1950s? Where are the non-Western counterparts to Newton, Einstein, Pasteur, Banting, Freud, Galileo, Claude Bernard etc, and how do their influences compare
I said medicine was universal, not that it wasn't Western but that it wasn't just western or particularly Western. Good wikisummary: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_medicine I won't pretend I know more than I do by regurgitating it for you.
 

coldweatherblue

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2007
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
8
You're switching between race and immigration. I agree that's it's very difficult to adapt when you come from the wrong culture and speak the wrong language and I fully support government programs to help those people adapt (and the understanding of their new countrymen as they do so). But there's nothing in your reasoning that explains why a non-white American has a disadvantage compared to a white American if they were both born here, in the same income bracket and location.

Just because someone was born in the U.S. does not mean that their background is the same as a 3rd-generation American from European ancestry, etc. I stated that the individual is absolutely able to succeed. However there are differences between groups that make it harder to "break out" of your surrounding culture. If you add in the qualifier "in the same income bracket and location" that argument breaks down. Look at a chart of inequality of wealth between ethnic groups in the U.S.; the inequality exists. I'm not saying anyone is "at fault" or anything, I'm just saying it exists. And I know that I'm talking about something not exactly related to URM med-students from upper-class backgrounds getting more scholarship opportunities, but the topic veered off a bit from there and that's the part to which I'm replying. Like I said earlier; these things might be unfair but I don't really care because I'm very proud of where I come from and it doesn't matter if part of the overall "pool" of wealth is given to someone else because maybe they need it and I'm going to succeed no matter what. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger, etc.
 

flaahless

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
2,243
Reaction score
12
Ended in 1971 (thanks wikipedia! also interesting article). I'm not saying the nation wasn't once a crazy hotbed of organized racism, heck I grew up in what used to be a slave state. What I'm saying is that it's over. When I see, for example, Jesse Jackson's son's attempt to take up the mantel of civil rights leadership I view it pretty much the same way I would view general Patton's grandson trying to reinvade Germany. This battle is over, the good side won, and now it's time to put down your weapons (Affirmitive Action). Just my opinion.
Cointelpro was just one example. (It is a pretty cool read though) Also wikipedia "redlining." Sure we have civil rights, but a written policy doesn't end the practice. The battle isn't over. A better analogy would be Chernobyl. When something has the magnitude of of centuries of overt oppression, there will be a large fallout that needs to be dealt with and cleaned up. I think ignoring it's existence and it's effects is a bit naive.

This is the Allo forum, think of it from a medical perspective. When an invasive surgery is completed, you just don't stitch the patient up and send them on their merry way. Post-op provides a whole new set of challenges that must be addressed to ensure the survival of the patient. Same principal.
 

DarknightX

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
May 18, 2007
Messages
713
Reaction score
501
Finally, if you think, as you suggested in an earlier post, that the playing field is leveled, and that any sort of support for minorities is groundless in the present, you certainly delude yourself. If that is the case, I don't think anything I or anybody says will change your skewed perspective. It's clearly evident when you come in contact with these groups.


Ummm, I'm sorry, but the playing field is level in terms of race.. It is clearly evident that YOU haven't been in contact with these groups. What's the difference between a poor white person and a poor black person in this country? Could you tell me the extra advantages a white child has growing up if he has no money? The disparity is in financial situations, not race.

Poor people in this country have the disadvantage, and no one race hs the monopoly on being disadvantaged. Being financially disadvantaged is a HUGE disadvantage, but I have yet to see any proof as to how poor minorities have it any worse than poor whites.

I had a good family friend who had a daughter. Her father was very well off, and she got private tutoring, SAT classes, MCAT classes, the works. Her GPA and MCAT were ok, but not stellar.

On the flip side, one of my best friends growing up was white. His family was extremely poor, and he had to work throughout college to hep his family. No MCAT classes, no tutoring, plus a full time job and the stress of a struggling family. Yet he had a much better GPA and MCAT than the other girl I knew, but somehow she got accepted to multiple top 20 schools, while he was happy with a single out of state acceptance.

Ya that's really fair. I think you are the one who is deluding yourself.

(and for the record, not that it makes a difference to me, but I'm black and I don't understand the utility of affirmitive action or any of these other ridiculous programs anymore. If anything, they just lower the standards for minorities, and it is NEVER a good thing to lower standards.)
 
Last edited:

Perrotfish

Has an MD in Horribleness
10+ Year Member
Joined
May 26, 2007
Messages
8,224
Reaction score
4,551
This is the Allo forum, think of it from a medical perspective. When an invasive surgery is completed, you just don't stitch the patient up and send them on their merry way. Post-op provides a whole new set of challenges that must be addressed to ensure the survival of the patient. Same principal.

Not a bad metaphor, but I think we're past that healing 'post-op' stage. Civil rights legislation didn't happen yesterday, the vast majority of that battle was over long before I was born. Yet we still keep treating the 'patient' with affirmitive action, apparently with no end in sight. To extend your metaphor, if you gave your patient an appendectomy a over a year ago, and they're still coming back for refills on their Vicodin, sooner or later even the dimmest surgeon is going to realize that the problem is no longer the surgery but rather with the post-op treatment. Furthermore that doc is actually preventing the patient from fully healing by enabling their dependence. Same principle applies here. There's no way this patient is getting completely well until we stop treating him like he's sick.
 

scube

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
278
Reaction score
2
if you wanted to increase the number of URM in medical school shouldn't you give these people money before they enter medical school. I mean how does paying for a persons tuition that is in medical school increase the number. Its not like once in medical school, strapped with debt one goes to a profession that pays less
 

beerog2003

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
211
Reaction score
11
Such as?


I landed a few pretty decent scholarships when I was in college, all of which was through privately donated money. As long as scholarships are privately funded, you won't hear me arguing about who the money is going to. I will definitely consider funding an undergraduate scholarship when I'm a physician, and I would target it towards someone like me when I was in college - parents with a good income but aren't interested in giving it to the broke college student! I wouldn't consider race or gender in the equation - just academics, ECs and financial need.

What the origional poster neglected to mention is that this this scholarship is awarded in conjunction with the Pfizer Medical Humanities Initiative which is private money!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Here is the link:

http://www.utmem.edu/Medicine/StudentAffairs/index.php?doc=inc/scholarships.html

It makes a better argument when you don't have the full context. Bottom line an Alaska native is more likely to set up a practice that serves Alaska natives, doesn't mean they are going to do it, just means it is more likely. There are certain demographics in our society that are medically underserved and it is arguably the AMA's job to address this issue. Since so many of you have strong feelings about this issue, maybe you can think of other ways to also address the issue and I pray that you incorporate those solutions into your medical practices. This is just one effort to tackle this issue.

Don't you want to see more diversity in medical school classes?

Fact is, there is genius in all races. For some unexplained reason the genius of underrepresented minorities gets disproportionately eliminated in the premed. process (that is an absolute FACT). This needs to change (my OPINION)...
 

Perrotfish

Has an MD in Horribleness
10+ Year Member
Joined
May 26, 2007
Messages
8,224
Reaction score
4,551
What the origional poster neglected to mention is that this this scholarship is awarded in conjunction with the Pfizer Medical Humanities Initiative which is private money!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Here is the link
Meh, I've never really seen the difference between public/private money in the context of this argument. No one is arguing that it's illegal create a race based scholarship, but rather that it's racist and wrong. I think it's wrong whoever does it. That applies to both public and private money.
 
Last edited:

The Empiricist

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2008
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I got too lazy to read through this whole thread (gotta get back to studying - you guys know how it is) so I apologize if any of this was already said. Also, I really appreciate that this thread has remained cordial and not degenerated into a flame war. It's good to know that we're all capable of educated and civil discourse here. :thumbup:

Anyways, I just wanted to back up Geliebt, who I think hits the nail on the head (at least in what I read in the first 1-2 pages of this thread). I think one of the most subtle and insidious residual effects of our past and continuing racism against certain minorities is that measures like affirmative action are interpreted by many as reactionary racism against the majority, or at least misguided.

Policies like affirmative action are, in the grand scheme of things, a relatively small band-aid against the backdrop of centuries of brutal racism and the oft-underestimated psychological reverberations that continue to this day. Geliebt mentioned earlier the effects on URM youth whose families do not encourage them to even try to pursue careers such as medicine. Add to that pop-culture stereotypes of black criminals and Latinos as illegal immigrants/maids and the influence of the URM youth's friends and relatives who are bad role models in part because they have fallen victim to the same forces and you quickly have a vicious cycle that takes much more to break than just making sure companies don't have racist hiring practices. Anybody read Kurt Vonnegut's "Breakfast of Champions?" One of my favorite quotes from his book was his snarky quote "Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves. Now they were free to run out and play." (That wasn't verbatim, but you get the idea.) When a people have been oppressed for so long, the poisonous effects fester, multiply, and entrench themselves deep within the fabric of society. You can't just remove the source of infection and expect everything to be ok. You need to administer some antibiotic too.

It's not just that the kid goes to bad schools and will bump into racist employers. It's also that the kid is less likely to try hard to succeed in the first place because he buys into pop culture stereotypes about himself, has parents/friends actively discouraging his dreams, and has parents/friends that make poor role models that implicitly tell him that as a URM, there is a ceiling on his success.

Because of this, policies like affirmative action are, in my opinion, necessary and painful measures that need to be instituted in order to problems like this that are rooted much deeper in society than many realize. Obviously, it's no fun, especially for poor whites, who do get the short end of the stick in some ways. But I think this will help all of us in the long run. Consider it a down payment on a future where minority health problems and crime rates go down and you have to pay less for increased police presence and healthcare for the uninsured (costs which make their way back to all of us indirectly.)

If you really think about it, minorities get screwed in a ton of ways in America (which is still probably one of the least racist countries in the history of the world). They make less money, live in poorer neighborhoods, don't live as long, get less healthcare, deal with more crime, get bad education, see themselves portrayed in racist fashion in the media, and when someone tries to fix it by handing out some scholarships to try to help a couple of them out of the hole, it looks illegitimate to a lot of people who are really much better off. And when a minority success story like Obama happens, people use his example to minimize the very real problems that still exist.

To those who cite the fact that many of their friends who benefit from AA are middle class or have parents who are 1st generation immigrants from Africa, I think that really should demonstrate just how bad black Americans have it. Even though we have programs like AA, many black Americans still aren't able to take advantage of it.

Full disclosure: I'm an over-represented minority.
Disclaimer: This was just a general defense of affirmative action, not an endorsement of any specific forms of it. I'm sure there are affirmative action policies out there that are bad, but I think that ultimately some form of it is needed to correct the inequalities in our society.
 
Top