im a bit confused, i thought CO is a opt out state. article says
"
Kim is accused of ordering his staff not to call 911 for more than five hours after Nguyen lost consciousness while undergoing a breast enhancement procedure." "The nurse anesthetist, who had worked alongside Kim for 10 years as an independent contractor, said Kim waited more than five hours before he finally agreed to let Meeker call 911."
but Kim isnt responsible for supervising Rex since its opt out state. They should be equally liable for not callling 911? And the nurse is an independent contractor.
Rex gave in his license to do anesthesia, but hes like 72 years old?
How can crna just say surgeon didnt let me call 911? Rex is an independent adult. State is opt out state. Surgeon can say that but if Rex followed, then hes an accomplice
This case should be posted in all the surgical forums i feel. ridiculous