- Joined
- Apr 23, 2004
- Messages
- 189
- Reaction score
- 0
juggamynugga said:I think I know why the UCSF area is cheaper. I went there for the interview and that area SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKS. So many vacant apartments and no good shops or restaurants like on fillmore. After I left UCSF I just wanted to leave. If they assume thats where you are living I can definitely see why its cheaper.
But see, it's the exact opposite. UCSF budgets $1,701 per month for living expenses while Pacific budgets $1,413 (both for single student off-campus). And we all know that the rent around Pacific is more expensive (and rightly so because it is a much nicer area). I think Pacific is trying to make there cost of living look cheaper so that the overall cost is lower. To me that $300 dollars a month is kind off a big deal, but I guess there is nothing we can do about it.
oh well... anybody have any new news?