Pathoma notes:
Got my first real chance to match up pathoma with Goljan this week. We alternate NBME's with in-house exams. So the NBME phases gives me more chance to focus on various board review materials.
I have to say that I do understand the appeal and utility of Goljan material. He's dynamic. Constantly relating different materials together. And clearly. Has dedicated his time to helping students get down the Pearls to do better on exams.
I think as a follow up discussion to Pathoma materials it's a perfect 1-2 punch.
However, I think that Dr. Sattar really nailed something. How to be a useful cliff notes to pathology lectures. Because his material is so stripped down, clean, quick, and easy to use. I'm able to use his material as my first and last pass at everything going on in lectures.
Yes it's not enough for some exhaustive phd-style approaches on in-house lecture exams. But luckily for me, my curriculum allows me the option of letting some of those points go. To keep it easier on me.
I keep hearing about the necessity of of widening the scope of our information intake. And honestly. I just don't understand that notion. I need 4 passes on the pathoma material alone just to make sure I've got it down. And i just can't find time for that other stuff.
So, I'm thinking if your goals are modest enough. This is almost everything you need to know about pathology.
But I'm curious what people that are using it think.?