Pathophysiology

[vette2k10]

---

Members don't see this ad.

hey guys, do you guys think that robbins and rr path is sufficient for pathophysiology for second year and the boards or would this book be worth buying?

http://www.amazon.com/Pathophysiolo...=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1299985988&sr=8-2

 

[thechad]

Did your search function break?

 

[vette2k10]

thanks for the sarcasm bro. I did look through previous threads, but they did not specifically answer my questions. maybe someone else has some better advice.

 

[Mace1370]

Have you seen RR path? That thing is a beast. If it doesn't adequately address pathophys for you then I don't want to see what does.

 

[da8s0859q]

hey guys, do you guys think that robbins and rr path is sufficient for pathophysiology for second year and the boards or would this book be worth buying?

Medium Robbins, RR path, and BRS path are sort of the big three when it comes to that sort of thing.

I use RR path and FA with our class lectures. I'm content with that most of the time.

 

[MossPoh]

thanks for the sarcasm bro. I did look through previous threads, but they did not specifically answer my questions. maybe someone else has some better advice.

There seriously wasn't one thread in the last 5+ years that answered whether the two pivotal books that thousands of med students use each year was sufficient?

I've actively participated in several of those threads....bro.

Short answer is yes, they will suffice. In fact, those two may be information overload in some areas of the course.

 

[vette2k10]

There seriously wasn't one thread in the last 5+ years that answered whether the two pivotal books that thousands of med students use each year was sufficient?

I've actively participated in several of those threads....bro.

Short answer is yes, they will suffice. In fact, those two may be information overload in some areas of the course.

haha. sweet Ill stick with those 2 books then