- Joined
- Jan 8, 2007
- Messages
- 4,342
- Reaction score
- 73
So you finally admit it. You started your career in pharmacy, because you wanted to be involved in "community" practice. This entire time, you've been the spokesman for "clinical" and "hospital" pharmacy. Interesting...I don't have a clue on long term prospect of retail pharmacy. As a pharmacist, it boggles my mind that retail pharmacist are paid as well as they do... I understand they work hard...then again, so do the technicians at a much lower salary.
I like to think Pharmacy as a product driven profession to some degree. But it will be the the product distribution process in conjuction with conitive process of providing pharmacy services that will survive the profession.
......
Most of you guys know how I feel about retail pharmacy. But I got into pharmacy because I wanted to own a drug store. I still dream of owning a drug store... a small town drug store with a little breakfast cafe and lunch menu... with free coffee. And a bait shack. I'll be the old geezer hanging out with the locals...trading stories.
Lots of students want to go into "community" practice, and the majority of them pursue it upon graduation. In my opinion, the role of a "clinical" or "specialty" pharmacist is foreign to pre-pharms. They see what "community" pharmacists do on a regular basis, and they either 1) try to emulate the pharmacists they see within the community by going to pharmacy school or 2) follow in the footsteps of a pharmacist with whom they are acquainted with and attend pharmacy school.
I can't really think of anyone, that I know of, who applied to pharmacy school to be worked to death with mindless cashier work, relentless pill counting, and drive-thru sensors dinging constantly. They just wanted to be that pharmacist who talks to the public about medications.
"Clinical" pharmacy along with residencies and fellowships are highly emphasized in pharmacy school. IMO, if post-residency "specialists", aka pharmacy school professors, did not solicit students, then the interest in "clinical" pharmacy would not exist to the extent that it does today.
From my experiences thus far, I believe that residencies are a waste of time and an insult to PharmDs who are having to "suffer" after graduation. Whatever happened to on-the-job training? What a miserable way to gain experience! They're basically saying that graduates should "suffer" for one or two years, and then they're free to do whatever they want. (That's the gist of what was said in my first day back in class.)
"Clinical" jobs are still available to PharmDs without residencies in some areas. WVU got a job, remember?
I applied to pharmacy school after working with a "clinical" pharmacist who had been a faculty member at another pharmacy school. I genuinely loved her stories. She talked about making rounds, teaching, making recommendations, and other sorts of duties. Frankly speaking, I was inspired. She gave me the right information that I needed to make a decision about my future at the right time, and I changed my career path because of what she was able to portray. It seemed "perfect".
However, once I started working in a hospital setting, I grew to dislike those people that I would be doing rounds with someday in the future. They were snide, pushy, needy, irresponsible, lazy, and "above" me. They made me feel like crap!, and there I was busting my butt without an ounce of appreciation.
So... look at how the tables have turned. Your initial interest in pharmacy was "community" based, and my decision to become a pharmacist was "clinically" based. You work as a "clinical" something or another (no one really knows exactly what you do Mr. Mysterious), and I work as a pharmacist-to-be who chats it up with clientèle in an intimate little drug store where "everybody knows your name".
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf5ojdakpq8&feature=related[/youtube]