- Joined
- Dec 9, 2013
- Messages
- 58
- Reaction score
- 42
Thank you
Last edited:
1st year OMS.
My school has a +/- grading system, and class rank.
I have become content earning 84+ on my tests. I used to stay up until 1:00am memorizing minutiae to earn that 95+ on a test... but its miserable and I often forget the obscure details after 2 weeks. I now stop studying for my courses at 8:00pm, and spend 1 hr reading/familiarizing first aid and solidifying my foundation, and then put away the medicine by 9:00pm. Watch TV, work out, sleep.... But many students in my class scratch and claw to get that A or A-. They say that "class rank matters", "grades matter because we are DOs and disadvantaged".
What is more high yield? Retaining my core foundation? Or investing the extra hours memorizing some transcription factor a professor cares about so I can get my "A"?
Anyone else with a similar experience to me wish they had kept up their grades or studied more for boards?
Thank you
Depends on where you are in your class rank with those 85s. If that puts you above average (it should) then I say keep doing that.Boards >> Clinical Grades >> Research >>> Class Rank >>> Preclinical Grades.
Preclinical grades only matter if you fail something.
A lot of schools stopped ranking, so even class rank is meaning less and less every year.
PDs only need to answer 3 questions:
1) Can he handle consistent stress? (Passing everything on the first try)
2) How smart is he? (Step 1 score)
3) Is he a dip****? (Clinical grades)
1st year OMS.
My school has a +/- grading system, and class rank.
I have become content earning 84+ on my tests. I used to stay up until 1:00am memorizing minutiae to earn that 95+ on a test... but its miserable and I often forget the obscure details after 2 weeks. I now stop studying for my courses at 8:00pm, and spend 1 hr reading/familiarizing first aid and solidifying my foundation, and then put away the medicine by 9:00pm. Watch TV, work out, sleep.... But many students in my class scratch and claw to get that A or A-. They say that "class rank matters", "grades matter because we are DOs and disadvantaged".
What is more high yield? Retaining my core foundation? Or investing the extra hours memorizing some transcription factor a professor cares about so I can get my "A"?
Anyone else with a similar experience to me wish they had kept up their grades or studied more for boards?
Thank you
Stop thinking like a pre-med. Your preclinical grades don't matter to program directors. See here for what does:
http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/NRMP-2016-Program-Director-Survey.pdf
But it does seem like class rank matters a bit. And wouldnt preclinical grades make up half of your class rank(or even more since you wont have all your clinical grades by the time you are applying to residency)?
But it does seem like class rank matters a bit. And wouldnt preclinical grades make up half of your class rank(or even more since you wont have all your clinical grades by the time you are applying to residency)?
If we are going to go off of anecdotal statements, I have met numerous 4th students on the interview trail and not a single one has given me an account of a program director ever bringing up preclinical grades.
I think what others (those wh believe rank and preclinical grades matter) are getting at is of course program directors will care about your grades/class rank if 1) you failed courses 2) you are ranked low and on the other spectrum of if you are AOA (which as a DO student, don't even worry about it because you won't be getting that) or if you are SSP (which for the vast majority of ACGME programs a PD won't even know what the hell SSP is or know that it's a joke of a an honors society staying in the top 40% of the class).
I'm going to stick by the Program Directors Survey and state that the importance factor cited for preclinical grades/class rank was LOWER than that of leadership skills, the interview, failed attempts on USMLE/COMLEX, Letters of Recommendation, Audition Rotations, Perceived Commitment to Specialty, Feedback from Residents.
Yes doing well in years 1-2 correlate to doing well on boards. But don't even think for a second the kid at the top 30% chance doesn't have a chance at killing boards. Anecdotal statement: I am aware of derm resident who stated they were middle of the road in class rank but killed boards.
As word of advice to those who are reading this thread as well, @gamerEMdoc is an associate program director for a residency program and understands fully what is important. There will be differences and variation on what is emphasized per program or in different specialties (such as ortho and derm) but when you take a look at all of the NRMP surveys across multiple specialties you'll see trends similar to what GamerERdoc has stated and what I have stated.
First, like I said in my post, I know that it isn't the NORM for PDs to care about preclinical grades/rank. If they did, it would obviously show in the PD Survey. What I was getting at is that there ARE some (not many most likely) places that do care (and I mentioned two places). I wasn't saying anything more or less. I am not implying by my n=2 that this is the case overall. I also said that your grades will matter "indirectly" because it will reflect in your board score, which we can both agree are important to the PD.
Second, I never said anything about people in the top 30% not being able to do well on boards. I didn't even say top 50%. I said "bottom of your class." I am pretty sure that most people are in agreement that if you are sitting in the bottom 10% of your class, you MOST LIKELY aren't going to be setting board records.
WHOAH BRO, WHOAH.
Again, the question is "do preclinical grades matter to PDs". And we both agree for the most part that they do but not to the extent of if a PD sees you got a B/C grade in preclinical neurosciences that you aren't cut for neurology if your board scores are great, you have good research, you have letters.
Exceptions are there. Competitive specialties are going to comb through your class rank more so than an FM or PM&R program.
Now if we aren't addressing the main question about it mattering to PDs. Yes better preclinical grades means a better mastery of the material means a stronger chance of doing well on boards. So they matter in that sense.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
Thanks for the clarification, bro. Now let's play some ping pong.
this is breathtakingStop thinking like a pre-med. Your preclinical grades don't matter to program directors. See here for what does:
http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/NRMP-2016-Program-Director-Survey.pdf
WHOAH BRO, WHOAH.
Again, the question is "do preclinical grades matter to PDs". And we both agree for the most part that they do but not to the extent of if a PD sees you got a B/C grade in preclinical neurosciences that you aren't cut for neurology if your board scores are great, you have good research, you have letters.
Exceptions are there. Competitive specialties are going to comb through your class rank more so than an FM or PM&R program.
Now if we aren't addressing the main question about it mattering to PDs. Yes better preclinical grades means a better mastery of the material means a stronger chance of doing well on boards. So they matter in that sense.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile