- Joined
- Dec 5, 2012
- Messages
- 551
- Reaction score
- 913
I want to get the group's thoughts on this. Previous threads on the topic haven't lead to much discussion, but I think it's worth revisiting given how things have changed, particularly as academic practices increase the production pressure. Selfishly, I am trying to make this decision for myself, and imagine I'm not alone.
One quick anecdote: as a CA-3 I did a rotation in a community PP shop run by a former grad from our program, now nearing the end of his career. He advised me to stay in academics because "Private practice isn't what it used to be- over time autonomy and pay have gone down, while the hours have remained more intense than those in academics".
He trained with my PD, so I relayed the community doc's comments by him the following week. His response: "I'd go PP if I could start over: we have the same production pressure now, but aren't paid nearly as much. Things were different when he and I trained."
Obviously there is a bit of grass-is-greener thinking going on here, but it struck me as interesting that these two peers nearing the end of their careers would switch places if they could.
---
For myself, I'm a CT/ICU fellow- my wife is also a physician ahead of me in training. Starting a family is very much on our minds right now. Neither of us have "academic" interests in the traditional sense: we are clinically-oriented people who really don't care much for research (clinical or otherwise). I enjoy a little administrative work, and teaching keeps things fresh, but neither is make-or-break for me. I've been offered a position at a major academic center in a city my wife and I would love to live and work in, but the pay feels relatively low (350ish total for each of us), and the cost of living is extremely high. Comparing this to what my co-fellows are looking to make (500-600k) in PP in other parts of the country has got my wondering if the grass wouldn't indeed be greener. Academics has variety, security, and (maybe?) more complexity, but I get the impression talking to folks the only real way to move up the foodchain is to to do research, and those who don't are treated like second-class citizens (while subsidizing the non-clinical time of those who do).
So I'm trying to decide: do I take my talents to a less-desirable area, make more money, but give up some of the perks I mentioned of the major system? Stop trying to beat 'em and join 'em instead: try to make research, and therefore this system, work for me? Seek out a lesser academic program where I can still teach, but am not penalized for falling asleep in statistics?
Help!
One quick anecdote: as a CA-3 I did a rotation in a community PP shop run by a former grad from our program, now nearing the end of his career. He advised me to stay in academics because "Private practice isn't what it used to be- over time autonomy and pay have gone down, while the hours have remained more intense than those in academics".
He trained with my PD, so I relayed the community doc's comments by him the following week. His response: "I'd go PP if I could start over: we have the same production pressure now, but aren't paid nearly as much. Things were different when he and I trained."
Obviously there is a bit of grass-is-greener thinking going on here, but it struck me as interesting that these two peers nearing the end of their careers would switch places if they could.
---
For myself, I'm a CT/ICU fellow- my wife is also a physician ahead of me in training. Starting a family is very much on our minds right now. Neither of us have "academic" interests in the traditional sense: we are clinically-oriented people who really don't care much for research (clinical or otherwise). I enjoy a little administrative work, and teaching keeps things fresh, but neither is make-or-break for me. I've been offered a position at a major academic center in a city my wife and I would love to live and work in, but the pay feels relatively low (350ish total for each of us), and the cost of living is extremely high. Comparing this to what my co-fellows are looking to make (500-600k) in PP in other parts of the country has got my wondering if the grass wouldn't indeed be greener. Academics has variety, security, and (maybe?) more complexity, but I get the impression talking to folks the only real way to move up the foodchain is to to do research, and those who don't are treated like second-class citizens (while subsidizing the non-clinical time of those who do).
So I'm trying to decide: do I take my talents to a less-desirable area, make more money, but give up some of the perks I mentioned of the major system? Stop trying to beat 'em and join 'em instead: try to make research, and therefore this system, work for me? Seek out a lesser academic program where I can still teach, but am not penalized for falling asleep in statistics?
Help!