You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Probability question
Started by marcusnasland
Same as the probability of any 8 child combination, since it is a specific order.What is the probability of having 2 girls followed by 2 boys followed by 2 girls followed by 2 boys... 8 children in total?
Im thinking 0.39%, but it is one of the end questions and they are usually harder so is there some sort of a trick to this?
You're correct. It is (1/2)^8 = 0.39%.
Same as the probability of any 8 child combination, since it is a specific order.
You're correct. It is (1/2)^8 = 0.39%.
with a deep sense of humbleness, the highest admiration and greatest level of respect and awe for mathgod, I would beg to differ.
please correct me if I'm wrong.
since youre not replacing kids, you can't just do (1/8)^8. you would do 1/8 * 1/7 * 1/6...
furthermore, that also would be incorrect. bec u the chance of picking the first boy is not 1/8. its 4/8 because there r 4 boys.
so I would do 4/8 * 3/7 * 4/6 * 3/5 * 2/4, etc. why is this wrong.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
streetwolf is right. the probability of getting a girl as a second child is not 3/7, its just one half (why would it be less than 50%?). then the probability of getting every subsequent specific gendered child is one half.
it is a specific order so the math (as streetwolf said) is (1/2)^8
it is a specific order so the math (as streetwolf said) is (1/2)^8
Last edited:
once u pick the first boy. there's only 7 left so isn't the chance of geting the next one 3/7
qccording to u guys if you would have just a boy and a girl. prob of getting boy first and girl second would be 1/2*1/2. that is clearly wrong. I would de 1/2 * 1/1. and that's correct. what's the diff in this case.
No what you're doing is starting with a family of 8 kids (4B / 4G) and one-by-one choosing them to do whatever.with a deep sense of humbleness, the highest admiration and greatest level of respect and awe for mathgod, I would beg to differ.
please correct me if I'm wrong.
since youre not replacing kids, you can't just do (1/8)^8. you would do 1/8 * 1/7 * 1/6...
furthermore, that also would be incorrect. bec u the chance of picking the first boy is not 1/8. its 4/8 because there r 4 boys.
so I would do 4/8 * 3/7 * 4/6 * 3/5 * 2/4, etc. why is this wrong.
If I said there's a family of 4B 4G and you need to sit them down in a row of 8 chairs, what is the probability of seating them in the order GG-BB-GG-BB then you'd be correct.
The probability of having a girl first is 1/2. The probability of having a girl second is 1/2. The probability of having a boy third is 1/2. You can look at all 8 births separately. Together you just multiply all those 1/2s and get (1/2)^8.
Not (1/8)^8 which is what you said in your reply to me.
No what you're doing is starting with a family of 8 kids (4B / 4G) and one-by-one choosing them to do whatever.
If I said there's a family of 4B 4G and you need to sit them down in a row of 8 chairs, what is the probability of seating them in the order GG-BB-GG-BB then you'd be correct.
The probability of having a girl first is 1/2. The probability of having a girl second is 1/2. The probability of having a boy third is 1/2. You can look at all 8 births separately. Together you just multiply all those 1/2s and get (1/2)^8.
Not (1/8)^8 which is what you said in your reply to me.
sorry man. yea I misundestood the q. I thought it meant you have 8 kids and you want to line them up 2 boys then 2 girls, etc.
my mistake. now that I read the q again it means to give birth to 2 boys then 2 girls.
but just to make sure, the way I did would have been right if the question was to line them up that way, right?
calgoob , that's what I meant when I said to line up a boy and girl, it would only be 2 ways.
I j