- Joined
- Dec 7, 2016
- Messages
- 1,117
- Reaction score
- 1,888
Yeah well at some point the reasonable response to your repeated self-hatred is bound to become "classic"... I guess, per your judgement, we are there.Classic.
Yeah well at some point the reasonable response to your repeated self-hatred is bound to become "classic"... I guess, per your judgement, we are there.Classic.
Agree 100%. Those cranial bones sure do NOT move, but there might be some therapeutic benefit in the technique, somewhere.I’m right there with you on some topics of OMM. Cranial in adults and Chapman’s points... yeah it’ll take more evidence to make me a believer. But ME and associated techniques is an easy way to instantly make someone feel better. I don’t see how is this a bad thing and it’s something I can get behind.
Id like to respectfully add thay chiropractors use the same techniques they just call them different names. muscle energy is basically PIR/active release technique, also both chiro and OMM use HVLA. the same Physiological responses are occuring in both OMM and chiro manipulation/soft tissue so not sure what it means to say OMM/osteopathy has a better scientific footing. Current DO education as a whole has a better scientific footing because it is medical school. As a DO student and a former chiropractor i can honestly say the functional anatomy and physiological processes of both OMM and chiro are strikingly similar yet the two professions still fight. DOs however are physicians. chiropractors arent. if were talking strictly omm/osteopathy theres little difference and its difficult to place them in different categoriesHowever poor the studies, the unproved claims of osteopathy have a better scientific footing than those of honest-to-god pseudoscience.
Why don't you just drop out and go to a Caribbean School? Get your precious MD and you won't have to deal with the pseudoscience of osteopathy.
You made your bed, now lie in it.
Unless you can show us the photo of the gun that was put to your head that forced you to go to a DO School?
Chiros are nowhere near equivalent what are you saying...theres a reason they aren't physiciansId like to respectfully add thay chiropractors use the same techniques they just call them different names. muscle energy is basically PIR/active release technique, also both chiro and OMM use HVLA. the same Physiological responses are occuring in both OMM and chiro manipulation/soft tissue so not sure what it means to say OMM/osteopathy has a better scientific footing. Current DO education as a whole has a better scientific footing because it is medical school. As a DO student and a former chiropractor i can honestly say the functional anatomy and physiological processes of both OMM and chiro are strikingly similar yet the two professions still fight. DOs however are physicians. chiropractors arent. if were talking strictly omm/osteopathy theres little difference and its difficult to place them in different categories
Chiros are nowhere near equivalent what are you saying...theres a reason they aren't physicians
You’re right my bad haha I’m sleep deprivedYeah... the difference is that DO goes beyond OMM into more traditional medicine. He only said the OMM training was similar to a DC, not the degree at large.
Remember Dr Palmer was a student of AT Still.Id like to respectfully add thay chiropractors use the same techniques they just call them different names. muscle energy is basically PIR/active release technique, also both chiro and OMM use HVLA. the same Physiological responses are occuring in both OMM and chiro manipulation/soft tissue so not sure what it means to say OMM/osteopathy has a better scientific footing. Current DO education as a whole has a better scientific footing because it is medical school. As a DO student and a former chiropractor i can honestly say the functional anatomy and physiological processes of both OMM and chiro are strikingly similar yet the two professions still fight. DOs however are physicians. chiropractors arent. if were talking strictly omm/osteopathy theres little difference and its difficult to place them in different categories
Cons: Everything.
Pros: Only a year and a half left.
lol
You need to make a twitter account haha.
exactly. except AT still was an actual physicianRemember Dr Palmer was a student of AT Still.
Yes, but that is why their techniques are si similar. Palmer was a student of Still for one year I believe.exactly. except AT still was an actual physician
Id like to respectfully add thay chiropractors use the same techniques they just call them different names. muscle energy is basically PIR/active release technique, also both chiro and OMM use HVLA. the same Physiological responses are occuring in both OMM and chiro manipulation/soft tissue so not sure what it means to say OMM/osteopathy has a better scientific footing. Current DO education as a whole has a better scientific footing because it is medical school. As a DO student and a former chiropractor i can honestly say the functional anatomy and physiological processes of both OMM and chiro are strikingly similar yet the two professions still fight. DOs however are physicians. chiropractors arent. if were talking strictly omm/osteopathy theres little difference and its difficult to place them in different categories
Remember Dr Palmer was a student of AT Still.
You arent wrong. im simply stating its the same stuff-OMM in and of itself and chiro (the soft tissue and HVLA manipulations and functional anatomy etc). The actual medical science isnt nearly comparable, just the osteopathic part as stated in previous posts. I was a chiro and now a medical student at DO school so Ive seen both sides here. And you cant say that DOs who practice OMM dont claim that adjustments can fix visceral disorders this is stated on the AOA website lol. I dont believe it but the minority of DOs that did an OMM fellowship teach this stuff so its not just chiros. I would never ever suggest someone become a chiropractor. ever. theyre in for a terrible future the profession isnt going to last if they dont change their philosophy which is one of many reasons i left to become an actual physicianExcept I’ve never been approached in a shopping mall by a D.O. with a supposed spinal alignment gun. Or been told that if my somatic nervous system was in alignment then I wouldn’t suffer untold afflictions and maladies.
The professions still fight because chiropractors try to masquerade as physicians. How many blogs and YouTube videos are there by alternative health professionals calling themselves “doctor” but when you search their credentials they hide their chiropractic degree or refer to themselves as “chiropractic physicians” in the more forthcoming cases.
#Coming2020I don't think the world is ready my friend.
I need to get my goddamn degree first and I promise you I will write the most god awful, nastiest review of my goddamn program on this website and then I will forever retire from SDN like the greats.
same more than likelyI don't think the world is ready my friend.
I need to get my goddamn degree first and I promise you I will write the most god awful, nastiest review of my goddamn program on this website and then I will forever retire from SDN like the greats.
A lot of chiros have no clue what they are doing. Some good ones some bad ones. They are good for relief of non-surgical low back pain only but that is about it. Efficacy hasn't shown to be any more effective than PT, just like OMM. PT just takes longer. OMM/chiro same thing (no this statement does not mean I am comparing DOs and chiros saying they are the same thing because a) the term OMM and the term DO are not one and the same b) chiros and DOs are the furthest from the same thing and c) i know someone will misconstrue this statement as me saying such. DOs are physicians, chiros are NOT physicians or "chiropractic physicians" whatever that word means. There is only ONE kind of physician: an MD or a DO, and maybe a DPM.Chiros are hit or miss, a lot of them tuck themselves deep into pseudoscience and think they are more important than they are.
But I would probably be depressed too if there were a bunch of real doctors running around and I was a chiro
Unless you can show us the photo of the gun that was put to your head that forced you to go to a DO School?
Same gun that's pointed at her head
However poor the studies, the unproved claims of osteopathy have a better scientific footing than those of honest-to-god pseudoscience.
Why don't you just drop out and go to a Caribbean School? Get your precious MD and you won't have to deal with the pseudoscience of osteopathy.
You made your bed, now lie in it.
Unless you can show us the photo of the gun that was put to your head that forced you to go to a DO School?
Hi friends, I hope this isn't a necro but I was wondering if there are any current students at UIW (Univ of Incarnate Word) who would want to give feedback on their school?
Chiros are hit or miss, a lot of them tuck themselves deep into pseudoscience and think they are more important than they are.
But I would probably be depressed too if there were a bunch of real doctors running around and I was a chiro
Thats like what we say about OMM, and we are still taught it. Also they had alot more quackery to start with. Note that all Chiropratic schools are against all vaccines.This is just word of mouth, but it was from a current chiro student. He said something to the affect of “the old-timer chiros legit have no idea what they are doing & give the modern chiros a bad name. The students being educated at the schools nowadays aren’t being taught all the quackery that the older chiros were taught/practice nowadays.”
Just an anecdote but that’s all I got.
Thats like what we say about OMM, and we are still taught it. Also they had alot more quackery to start with. Note that all Chiropratic schools are against all vaccines.
Thats like what we say about OMM, and we are still taught it. Also they had alot more quackery to start with. Note that all Chiropratic schools are against all vaccines.
I have an aquaintance who is currently in chiropractic school and they teach that vaccines are part of the “dogma” that modern physicians adhere to simply because they are told to and that vaccines have never been proven to actually prevent disease.Wait... if the above/bolded/red true?!..... I'm tired; my sarcasm sensor is offline currently.
I have an aquaintance who is currently in chiropractic school and they teach that vaccines are part of the “dogma” that modern physicians adhere to simply because they are told to and that vaccines have never been proven to actually prevent disease.
Wait... if the above/bolded/red true?!..... I'm tired; my sarcasm sensor is offline currently.
Pro: Seton Hill University looks like Hogwartscan anyone do one for LECOM-SH? heard it's decent besides from the required dress code/no food and water which i dont really mind
Lol wtfI have an aquaintance who is currently in chiropractic school and they teach that vaccines are part of the “dogma” that modern physicians adhere to simply because they are told to and that vaccines have never been proven to actually prevent disease.
Pro: Seton Hill University looks like Hogwarts
Well, I don't go there, but from my impression at interview, it sounds like they don't have any research on campus at all. Pittsburgh is about 1-1.5 hours away too, so interested students would really have to be very proactive in getting opportunities and willing to commute. I guess that's a con.lol has to be more than that
they seem to have fairly good rotations that are guaranteed for third years and PBL means less time in lectures and more free time to study for boards of which they score fairly well on. plus mad cheap tuition
Pro: They offered me an interview, and have no cadaver lab. Tuition is cheap.lol has to be more than that
they seem to have fairly good rotations that are guaranteed for third years and PBL means less time in lectures and more free time to study for boards of which they score fairly well on. plus mad cheap tuition
If Campbell is not mandatory attendance for traditional then PBL is actually a trick they make it seem like you have less class but in actuality you spend more time in class than traditional because trad you never have to go at all you can just watch lectures so you actually have more freedom with your schedule. My roommate is PBL but hes up at 730am 4 days a week for class while I get to sleep till 10am every morning. The schools dont tell you this but after you do your research youre like wait a minute....lol has to be more than that
they seem to have fairly good rotations that are guaranteed for third years and PBL means less time in lectures and more free time to study for boards of which they score fairly well on. plus mad cheap tuition
If Campbell is not mandatory attendance for traditional then PBL is actually a trick they make it seem like you have less class but in actuality you spend more time in class than traditional because trad you never have to go at all you can just watch lectures so you actually have more freedom with your schedule. My roommate is PBL but hes up at 730am 4 days a week for class while I get to sleep till 10am every morning. The schools dont tell you this but after you do your research youre like wait a minute....
no cadaver lab is a pro? is it because it saves you some time or something?Pro: They offered me an interview, and have no cadaver lab. Tuition is cheap.
Con: I didn't go cause I had an MD interview which obviously didn't take me, so now I pay 15k more in tuition.
Moral: Always reschedule, never cancel interviews.
Dude cavader lab sucks haha I never go it doesnt help me and is a huge time eater. You can do well just studying on own and then getting a tutor before the practicals. So yes its a pro to not have mandatory cadaver labno cadaver lab is a pro? is it because it saves you some time or something?
lol has to be more than that
they seem to have fairly good rotations that are guaranteed for third years and PBL means less time in lectures and more free time to study for boards of which they score fairly well on. plus mad cheap tuition
Well, I don't go there, but from my impression at interview, it sounds like they don't have any research on campus at all. Pittsburgh is about 1-1.5 hours away too, so interested students would really have to be very proactive in getting opportunities and willing to commute. I guess that's a con.
There's a lot of pros and some cons. When I get a chance, I'll actually do a write up.
Pittsburgh is 45 min away, not 1-1.5 hrs. Agree that you have to be proactive, and for those that were, they had plenty of research opportunities. Some of them worked in labs and those involved in community health even participated in the Schweitzer fellowship. I mainly did research in 3rd/4th that nice, fast, and purely clinical, so that was useful, but the school itself does not offer you much in this regard.
Confirmed true. Dated a chiro student for a little bit at one point.
Was not my proudest moment but getting my back cracked on the regular >>>>
You was cracking that back too tho amirite????
Pro: Seton Hill University looks like Hogwarts
can anyone do one for LECOM-SH? heard it's decent besides from the required dress code/no food and water which i dont really mind
lol has to be more than that
they seem to have fairly good rotations that are guaranteed for third years and PBL means less time in lectures and more free time to study for boards of which they score fairly well on. plus mad cheap tuition
really? heard that after the first fall semester the free time really starts to flow for LECOM-SH students
There's a lot of pros and some cons. When I get a chance, I'll actually do a write up.
Pittsburgh is 45 min away, not 1-1.5 hrs. Agree that you have to be proactive, and for those that were, they had plenty of research opportunities. Some of them worked in labs and those involved in community health even participated in the Schweitzer fellowship. I mainly did research in 3rd/4th that nice, fast, and purely clinical, so that was useful, but the school itself does not offer you much in this regard.
a write-up would be great! thanks!
Pros:
Cons:
-LECOM does not pay for rotation sites, so there is some undue fluctuation and drop in rotation quality associated with this
-Several other faculty members are incompetent and you have to deal with it
Overall very happy to be here- many of the cons are not unique to this program. I would think it's reasonable to choose this campus over most other DO programs, except for the older Texas DO program(s?), most of the state schools (out of state WVSOM is a tougher decision due to the price), maybe RVU-CO, ATSU-KCOM, KCU-COM, PCOM-PA. But that's just, like, my opinion.
You aren’t allowed even water in the lecture hall? Gracious sakes...Isn't the rotation system kind of based on luck so you could get really good rotation sites or really bad ones? (unless have above a 3.0 or something like that?)
Don't all schools have some faculty members that are incompetent?
And yeah I feel like overall this is a good DO school that is up there with its peers. Feel like it just gets a lot of heat because of the weird rules. The dress code shouldn't be a big deal to most med students I feel. If they could only start allowing water and coffee in the lectures hall man