Lets say my reaction test is "I say Skill. and then if someone replies issue, then they are town"
The test can go wrong , or fumble the read for any reason, but what matters is the *intent* of the post, not the result. If the intent was to make a reaction test, then the result is moot, its still a test.
*chimes in*
I dont think it was an obvious reaction test, specially for early posts in the phase, the trolling or doing crazy non srs things is always a consideration
*The second point is something that makes me lean town on moon actually. Like, yeah their entrance had only a jab at your entrance with the vote so in that context it could be seen as bad. But later when they voted you again without the receipts, not having the reason stated on thread but if you go back with that piece of knowledge makes their first vote/post have more sense, and makes their direction have more ground tbh
The low confidence since having no meta on you is showed both of when they state it in
p#146 , and in how easy they agreed to switch onto samac when she told moon to move.
* The discrediting you for saying that the feed me seymour question was leading in any direction I think is exaggerating a bit, but also fair because I liked your questioning of PSV :hmmyes:
