Question about statistical significance

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

medicinehopeful

Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
hey all,

i'm not very good with statistics and had a question (however dumb it may be).

Suppose a trial is testing reduction in breast cancer mortality. The results are that the relative risk of breast cancer mortality is 0.77 with 95% CI at 0.53-1.11.

how do i know if these results are statistically significant?

thanks!
 
hey all,

i'm not very good with statistics and had a question (however dumb it may be).

Suppose a trial is testing reduction in breast cancer mortality. The results are that the relative risk of breast cancer mortality is 0.77 with 95% CI at 0.53-1.11.

how do i know if these results are statistically significant?

thanks!
you are 95% sure that the range of RR is between 0.53 and 1.11. So your exposure could be anything from protective (at 0.53 you're ~half risk) to harmful (1.11 or 10/9ths risk). Since you can't tell which it is, you do not have a statistically significant result.

The short way of saying this is any RR with a CI that contains 1 is not significant.