- Joined
- Jan 11, 2016
- Messages
- 91
- Reaction score
- 43
Here's the deal:
I am applying this upcoming cycle and my school has a committee whose process starts in the spring semester so I have started to think about who I want to get LoRs from and what combination will be the best for my application. The committee only allows 3 letters to be included (so essentially I am capped at 3 because from what I know the committee letter trumps most medical schools' LoR requirement, correct?).
2 of the letters are basically set in stone and I will be asking them in January (expect them to say yes without a problem: My PI (working in his lab for almost 3 years, done lots of great work in his lab and my post-doc mentor should be helping him write it!) and an upper level bio professor (got an A in his class and have been TAing his class for 2 semesters now, should also be pretty good). My issue comes with the third and final slot, for which I have narrowed down to my two best options:
What do you guys think I should do? My gut tells me to go with the latter due to me knowing her for longer and she could speak to non-academic personal qualities related to leadership/community work/etc. At the same time, I don't know if the one science academic letter would be enough though. Does my PI's letter count as another "academic" one due to his field being bio-related?
I am applying this upcoming cycle and my school has a committee whose process starts in the spring semester so I have started to think about who I want to get LoRs from and what combination will be the best for my application. The committee only allows 3 letters to be included (so essentially I am capped at 3 because from what I know the committee letter trumps most medical schools' LoR requirement, correct?).
2 of the letters are basically set in stone and I will be asking them in January (expect them to say yes without a problem: My PI (working in his lab for almost 3 years, done lots of great work in his lab and my post-doc mentor should be helping him write it!) and an upper level bio professor (got an A in his class and have been TAing his class for 2 semesters now, should also be pretty good). My issue comes with the third and final slot, for which I have narrowed down to my two best options:
- A second upper class bio professor (taken two classes with her, gotten some kind of an A in both but from what I hear through other people, she asks students to draft the letter on their own before she looks over it and makes changes) -- not sure how I feel about this to be honest....
- My boss from an on-campus part time (10 hrs/week) job (she holds a pretty high administrator role in the university) who I have been working under for over 2 years now. The work is a mix of administrator type work and interesting leadership/volunteering type activities that she could talk about and I believe she is also a good writer as well. I don't know her THAT well or anything but well enough to get at-least a decently strong letter from.
What do you guys think I should do? My gut tells me to go with the latter due to me knowing her for longer and she could speak to non-academic personal qualities related to leadership/community work/etc. At the same time, I don't know if the one science academic letter would be enough though. Does my PI's letter count as another "academic" one due to his field being bio-related?