system7

7+ Year Member
Jul 27, 2009
80
0
141
Status
this is question #208 from 2009 destroy

which set of quantum numbers best describes a valance electron in Germanium?
a) 4,0,0,1/2
b) 4,1,1,1/2
c) 4,2,-1,1,2
d) 4,2,3,1,2
e) 3,1,1,1/2

the answer they have given is b. What i'm getting is 4,1,-1,1/2
since the 4p valence electron is in the first orbital of 4p, it should have a magnetic quantum number of -1. somebody please explain this to me if i'm not getting this right. thanks
 

Maygyver

10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Jun 14, 2008
2,309
27
91
Status
Pre-Dental
this is question #208 from 2009 destroy

which set of quantum numbers best describes a valance electron in Germanium?
a) 4,0,0,1/2
b) 4,1,1,1/2
c) 4,2,-1,1,2
d) 4,2,3,1,2
e) 3,1,1,1/2

the answer they have given is b. What i'm getting is 4,1,-1,1/2
since the 4p valence electron is in the first orbital of 4p, it should have a magnetic quantum number of -1. somebody please explain this to me if i'm not getting this right. thanks

I believe the magnetic quantum number can be 1, 0, or -1. I'm not sure if there is any differing in which ones fill up as far as that goes. I think you should know that it is b due to the first 2 numbers (4 and 1) and then just knowing that the p shell can have magnetic quantum numbers of -1 to +1.
 

SPR1624

10+ Year Member
Apr 2, 2009
22
0
0
Status
Pre-Medical
If the numbers are listed as n,l,ml,ms............

Wouldn't the correct quantum numbers be....

4,3,-3 to 3, and + or - 1/2? in the same order listed above?
 
Jun 14, 2009
800
3
0
Status
Pre-Dental
If the numbers are listed as n,l,ml,ms............

Wouldn't the correct quantum numbers be....

4,3,-3 to 3, and + or - 1/2? in the same order listed above?
n = level = 4
l = sublevel; s=0, l=1, d=2
ml = angular momentum states = -l to l
ms = spin = 1/2, -1/2

A p orbital is l=1

As for the op, simple answer is that the exact value of ml is somewhat arbitrary, because who's to say what exact orientations in space represent px, py, and pz. Basic info to understand is that the ml of a p orbital could be 1, 0, or -1. Beyond that you just have to make sure the other quantum numbers make sense.
 

system7

7+ Year Member
Jul 27, 2009
80
0
141
Status
i guess i was getting confused because i thought every valence electron had one exact value for ml otherwise i know that for any p subshell, ml could only be -1, 0, or +1, for d it could only be -2,-1,0+1,+2 etc. anyway, thanks for the quick replies.