- Joined
- Nov 11, 2002
- Messages
- 121
- Reaction score
- 0
good luck! go get 'em! 

Originally posted by doc08
Has anyone heard anything from Meharry recently?
Originally posted by lotanna
Thanks, I'm like so excited, like a soldier in battle, getting ready for war 😀
Originally posted by Raptor
I don't usually post on SDN, but I had to congratulate lotanna, you are the epitome of hard work and determination. Climb over the interview wall soldier and rest on the acceptance field because your hard work will pay off. But don't rest too long because you have the medical school wall to climb over. With God's speed soldier you will definetly do it. We all are cheering you on lotanna.![]()
![]()
![]()
Originally posted by Jamaican MD
Lotanna! Don't keep us in suspense! How did the interview go??
Originally posted by lotanna
Heyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy I got in to Michigan STate College of Human Medicine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![]()
Received the wonderful phone call from Dr Shafer about 10mins ago, at 8pm!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yup its official, looks like I'm about to be a green and white MSU Spartan for life, undergrad,masters and med schl!!
Its taken 2.5yrs since undergrad, and takin that %&&%^&* exam known as the MCAT more times than most anyone I know!
Even with a sub par MCAT score, under 30, a sub par undergrad GPA, under 3.0, I was able to get in! So I say it can be done.
The phone call woke me up from my sleep and I'm still kinda disoriented, so maybe tomorrow i'll fully understand what it all means. Funny thing was that I was over confident and expected to get in, I knew how hard I had worked to correct my mistakes.
Yup, to all who crack up on people like me on SDN and tell them to pursue some other health careers....BOOOYAAAAHH, I'm bout to be a M1, fresh off my 24th bday with a masters degree in hand 😀
And if some insane SDNer starts askin my URM status, Its bout to be on and poppin 🙄
Originally posted by lotanna
And if some insane SDNer starts askin my URM status, Its bout to be on and poppin 🙄
Originally posted by cocoabutter
Congratulations, lotanna!!
I am so happy for you. I know that you worked hard and have waited a long time for this....
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Originally posted by mdqueen
Hey Latonna,
UCLA is pretty good. I have my block final today at 3 pm. This curriculum has been interesting, and some parts are more organized than others. Overall I love the integrated curriculum and all the students in my class are so cool (which is a blessing). Well, we'll see how I feel after the final. Hopefully I get that P!
Shout out to cocoabutter, how is Wake?? Good to see all the people from last year doing well.
mdqueen
Originally posted by lotanna
Even with a sub par MCAT score, under 30, a sub par undergrad GPA, under 3.0, I was able to get in! So I say it can be done.
And if some insane SDNer starts askin my URM status, Its bout to be on and poppin 🙄
Originally posted by OrthoFixation
First, congratulations on your acceptance.🙂 It sounds as you have made repeated efforts and finally overcome the hurdle. Kudos to you.
Second, the URM status question pops up because it can impact your ability to gain admission. URMs can get in with lesser numbers than the general population. URMs will also have more scholarship opportunities since schools are competing for this sub-group. Of course, all of us would take any available advantage(s) in the admissions process, if one is available.
My question: What percentage of minority make-up is needed to be considered a minority? I have seen that both MCAT and AMCAS indicate minority designation is a self-described category and requires no proof for eligibility. With the blending of minor/major groups, what is the threshold required for this status? From the MCAT/AMCAS perspective, it is not defined.
% minority.......% caucasion.............Considered a minority?
.....0........................100.................................No
...100.........................0...................................Yes
.....75........................25..................................???
.....49........................51..................................???
.....25........................75..................................???
.......1........................99..................................???
This is a serious question and would appreciate you opinions. I have substantial Native American heritage, although less than half. Could I apply as URM? 😕
Originally posted by lotanna
Its taken 2.5yrs since undergrad, and takin that %&&%^&* exam known as the MCAT more times than most anyone I know!
Even with a sub par MCAT score, under 30, a sub par undergrad GPA, under 3.0, I was able to get in! So I say it can be done.
Originally posted by pathdr2b
CONGRATULATIONS !!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
As for your "qualifications", I can't think of a better quality in a physician than TENACITY !!!!
Good luck to you !!!!!
1) URMs are held to lower standards
2) Middle class and rich URMs are beneficiaries
3) non-URMs are deprived of their civil rights
Originally posted by strangeattractor
i thought i'd jump into the discussion a little late and reply from a supportive position...i would say those who really have a problem with aa for the most part have a problem with dismantling priveledge because they already clearly benefit from their birthright. one person mentioned civil rights being violated by aa...which is quite a ridiculous display of fallacy if i've ever seen one. reverse discrimination? what a joke. until true (and by this i mean equality has been reached) reparations are made with everyone of an underpriveledged position, including those of a lower socioeconomic class in addition to those who fit the traditional urm definition, reverse discrimination is yet a tool of the priveledged to retain power and clout. obviously if we are to achieve a state of civil equality, those with a disproportionate amount of power and status will need to relinquish some. that's just the law of conservation.
that said, i feel aa at the university or graduate level needs to implemented while also putting money and effort into early education, and more importantly, community reinforcement.
i was going to respond to ryo-ohki's message, but feel it would be a useless exercise in rhetoric to try and make sense of fallacy (see above).
Originally posted by strangeattractor
i thought i'd jump into the discussion a little late and reply from a supportive position...i would say those who really have a problem with aa for the most part have a problem with dismantling priveledge because they already clearly benefit from their birthright. one person mentioned civil rights being violated by aa...which is quite a ridiculous display of fallacy if i've ever seen one. reverse discrimination? what a joke. until true (and by this i mean equality has been reached) reparations are made with everyone of an underpriveledged position, including those of a lower socioeconomic class in addition to those who fit the traditional urm definition, reverse discrimination is yet a tool of the priveledged to retain power and clout. obviously if we are to achieve a state of civil equality, those with a disproportionate amount of power and status will need to relinquish some. that's just the law of conservation.
Originally posted by Treg
I got m first interview offer today-AECOM! Earlier this week I received my screened secondary from OHSU. Things are going well....😀 😀
Treg
Originally posted by Treg
I got m first interview offer today-AECOM! Earlier this week I received my screened secondary from OHSU. Things are going well....😀 😀
Treg
Originally posted by pathdr2b
Another congratulations !!!!! Looks like URM's on SDN are going to have a 100% acceptance rate!!![]()
![]()
Originally posted by bullhorn
Rho-Ohki please find your own thread and stop tainting a positive one. I am SOOOOO tired of hearing about your URM complaints. When are you going to get into medical school and be too busy to respond?
Lotanna, its unfortunate your celebration has turned into YET ANOTHER AA/URM thread. Why must URMS constantly struggle to find havens to support each other? SIGH
Originally posted by Gbemi24
The major fallacy in this line of thinking is that you are assuming the Constitution guarantees equal outcomes. It does not. The problem with most proponents of AA is that they do not only want equal access, but guaranteed equal outcomes as well. When equal access leads to a disparity in outcomes they demand that the system be changed to accomodate the disparity in outcomes.
Originally posted by Jamaican MD
You have made me a believer! God is TRULY good.
Originally posted by Amicus
This is the heart of the whole problem. You are absolutely right. I had no idea you were anti AA.
I will say this. We can only argue that there is equal opporotunity if we can find a way to equalize the quality of primary schools in the country. If i was president the first thing i would do would be to push for a nation wide education reform. No AA in higher education, ESPECIALY not med school, ending school vouchers for private schools and fighting the teachers unions which keep crap teachers employed. Pay increases to competent teachers who work in undesirable areas.
Originally posted by Gbemi24
On the surface this sounds like a great solution and it is to some extent. However, as I pointed out in my penultimate post, many of the blacks doing poorly on standardized tests and in school in general are from the middle and upper classes. These students in effect have equal opportunity, but are still not performing to par.
Originally posted by Gbemi24
On the surface this sounds like a great solution and it is to some extent. However, as I pointed out in my penultimate post, many of the blacks doing poorly on standardized tests and in school in general are from the middle and upper classes. These students in effect have equal opportunity, but are still not performing to par. Your proposals would work for the poor, but not for the middle class. This is precisely why the proponents of AA are against affirmative action based on socio-economic status. The majority of URMs applying to professional schools are not from the ghetto, so AA based on economics would force the black middle class to compete with the white and asian middle classes. This is what they fear. How do we deal with the underperformance of the black middle class? The problem clearly seems to be cultural, and it is difficult to solve. Cultural attitudes are not easily changed.
P.S. People are usually surprised to find out that I am anti-AA. I am somewhat schizophrenic on AA and racial politics in general. The emotional part of my brain tends to support AA and many black issues because I think as a group, blacks have been more abused in this country than any other group (with the possible eception of native Ameicans). However, the more rational part of my brain tends to call it as it sees it.