Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
It sounds like there wasn't initially enough panic about the situation from a public health perspective
This same situation happened in Denver when a rescue brought up a group of puppies from Texas that were exposed to a skunk. To be fair, they didn't know initially that they had been exposed to the skunk.
HOWEVER, when they learned about the skunk, they didn't take it seriously. The litter of puppies exposed dozens of people at an adoption event and literally all but maybe one puppy ended up testing positive. The group tried to demonize public health because of the forced euthanasia of the pups for testing and mislead the the public into thinking that euthanasia wasn't required for testing 🙄
unless they're made to, but how good is contact tracing for something like this?
With the above event I mentioned, it's actually pretty good, at least in Denver. I'm pretty sure that they found most people who interacted with the puppies at the adoption event. The motivation to not have dead kids on the local level is pretty strong.