- Joined
- Jul 15, 2014
- Messages
- 2,482
- Reaction score
- 3,425
It's like people aren't taught (or they otherwise promptly forget) that the manualized nature of some modalities is part of the protocol. Just pulling out some cognitive reframing strategies from CBT and mixing them with whatever conceptually-muddled therapy smoothie you've concocted does not make you an eclectic therapist. It makes you unstructured and misguided, and overzealous attempts to try and appease every patient's particular whims about therapeutic methodologies can sometimes feed into that. Unfortunately these folks have also started to spread their ideas beyond the clinic and into the lay circles--some therapist influencer on TikTok may sat that CBT is just gaslighting and isn't okay for neurodivergent people and then patients and other laypersons just repeat those lines ad nauseam.
It comes from a very old (and discredited) belief that therapists can 'choose' their theoretical approach. Midlevels and lower tier professional doctorates are often taught the common factors approach as if it is the gospel not knowing that even the smarter among the common factors folks still agree that adherence to a evidenced-based theoretical approach is a necessary for component for change (i.e., Norcross). There are also not taught CBT adequately because it's usually presented quickly alongside a number of other theoretical approaches (viewed to be equally valid) so strawmen arguments abound.
I read an AMA with Stephen Faraone (probably the top expert in ADHD after Barkley) who was hassled for saying that CBT for Adult ADHD, is effective (which it is though not as effective as medication). It just seems like that's what you get with Reddit.