- Joined
- Feb 17, 2016
- Messages
- 398
- Reaction score
- 290
We're actually saying two different things. My apologies for being more of the lurker type and not the best with actually posting.
It looks like what I am trying to say appears to be not as great of an effect as it was once thought to be
"A new model developed by the scientists also confounds previous findings on the length of time re-exposure chickenpox boosts immunity to shingles. The effect was thought to last for up to 20 years, but results of the current modeling study show it only lasts for two. The new model is the first based on real immunological and virological data from individuals."
Here's the article I got the quote from, didn't have a chance to look for the actual journal
http://www.infectioncontroltoday.co...hingles-cases-but-mainly-in-young-adults.aspx
Edit: Found the actual journal, I believe it's a free article
http://elifesciences.org/content/4/e07116v1
It looks like what I am trying to say appears to be not as great of an effect as it was once thought to be
"A new model developed by the scientists also confounds previous findings on the length of time re-exposure chickenpox boosts immunity to shingles. The effect was thought to last for up to 20 years, but results of the current modeling study show it only lasts for two. The new model is the first based on real immunological and virological data from individuals."
Here's the article I got the quote from, didn't have a chance to look for the actual journal
http://www.infectioncontroltoday.co...hingles-cases-but-mainly-in-young-adults.aspx
Edit: Found the actual journal, I believe it's a free article
http://elifesciences.org/content/4/e07116v1
Last edited: