I really, really, really, hope I don't regret posting this theory I've held that can explain
some cases of apparent discrimination in admissions. I don't want to fan any flames, my aim is simply to show that sometimes appearances can be deceiving, expecially when combined with
confirmation bias.
Let's say that there are 10 applicants fighting for 3 spots. All the applicants are
equal in terms of GPA/DAT/experience. For whatever demographic reasons, the makeup of these ten applicants is:
Majority applicants: 8
Minority applicants: 2
Spots available: 3
Choosing 3 out of these 10 equal applicants objectively is difficult for the adcoms, so they choose to offer spots in an
effectively random manner. These adcoms do not in any way discriminate between Majority and Minority applicants, but the results of their effectively random selectons can appear discriminatory:
Case 1: (46.7% chance)
Accepted Majority applicants: 3 (37.5% acceptance rate, 5 rejected)
Accepted Minority applicants: 0 (0% acceptance rate, 2 rejected)
Appears to be: "Clear" discrimination against Minority applicants. People might post to SDN regarding racial barriers in getting a higher education, especially at school X.
----------
Case 2: (46.7% chance)
Accepted Majority applicants: 2 (25% acceptance rate, 6 rejected)
Accepted Minority applicants: 1 (50% acceptance rate, 1 rejected)
Appears to be: "Clear" case of reverse discrimination against Majority applicants. People might post to SDN regarding higher acceptance rates for Minority applicants at school X.
----------
Case 3: (6.7% chance)
Accepted Majority applicants: 1 (12.5% acceptance rate, 7 rejected)
Accepted Minority applicants: 2 (100% acceptance rate, 0 rejected)
Appears to be: "Clear" case of reverse discrimination against Majority applicants. People might post to SDN with something along the lines of "All you have to do is be a minority to get in at X dental school."
Reality in all three cases: It was just chance, even though the 7 rejected applicants were qualified, there aren't enough spots to fit everyone. Dental schools could fill their ranks with 4.0/20+'s if they wanted, but they look for other things like experience, character, etc, that do not appear in statistical averages. Or maybe your interviewer didn't like the color of your suit.
To everyone, if you've felt cheated that someone with a lower GPA/DAT got in instead of you, perhaps the other applicant had much better observational/volunteer experience, or a really great interview. We'll never know for sure. Remember, there's probably someone out there with a higher GPA, dental legacy, etc. who feels cheated that
YOU got into their school of choice while they got rejected.
Disclaimer: I'm not attacking anyone, and the last thing I want to do is throw fuel on a flame war. Nor am I denying that discrimination (reverse or otherwise) exists. I'm just saying that sometimes what appears to be discrimination can just be an artifact of sheer chance.