I think it’s very likely
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
Reverse WW - Game Thread
Started by Animal Midwife
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
then do you think they're v/v
because this is something i think is likely but certain people seem afraid to say
I’m pretty sure every vote on the pip wagon is village
Which at this point is a valid thought that one exists, because (HOW CAN WOLVES KILL THEMSELVES AT NIGHT). Unless I supposseeee there’s a vig-type role but...I can’t sit and believe that because how do you kill MJ. Anyways not really important at the moment just irritating and entertaining to think about.
lynch cubs
Bc you can’t vote so like unhelpful. Also I’ve gotten the village vibes for awhile.
Bc you can’t vote so like unhelpful. Also I’ve gotten the village vibes for awhile.
what kind of 3p exists in this gamemode which is dependent on killing a wolf
i cant imagine anyone with a village similar wincon willingly killing mj
it's prob some sort of hidden/passive kill
it's prob some sort of hidden/passive kill
the pippy wagon doesnt spring ahead like that with a pure village wagonI’m pretty sure every vote on the pip wagon is village
if anything
if the plan is voting someone who cant vote then nav is the call bc cubs should still be under suspicion
and leaving cubs alive just drags it to stalemate in a 3 person lylo with him in it
votes can be withheld and wolves will most likely be forced for village parity
tldr:
lynch nav, leave cubs alive until further notice
lynch nav, leave cubs alive until further notice
vote navilly
forced to kill*
tldrtldr
having one person who cant vote in a 3 person lylo
is plus ev for village
having one person who cant vote in a 3 person lylo
is plus ev for village
hammer can't be shifted to 1 since self hammering is allowed
votes withheld
goes into a 3 person night phases with what's most likely a mandatory wolf kill
village wins
how many players are we at
10?
10?
well if one wolf lynch loses the whole thing then
to get to that ideal f3 with cubs in it
10->8->6->4
which actually might complicate things
cubs alive in a 4 person mylo ****s things up doesnt it
to get to that ideal f3 with cubs in it
10->8->6->4
which actually might complicate things
cubs alive in a 4 person mylo ****s things up doesnt it
the saving grace would be another double nk night
regardless the thought here is that we need 3 solid consensus villager lynches
which unfortunately, isnt provided by just blindly excluding all the people here
that poe is way too narrow for my liking
what is that, dubz, nav and myself?
if im right about grebes and acan, that's two back to back village lynches
then the hope is that im right about nav being lynchable as well
WildZoo
Noble Dubz Dictator, Unyeetable Phasing Wolf
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
so the job for RIGHT NOW
is to not throw your vote willy nilly since for every single lynch moving forward
the game can be lost
so tell me if you agree with
-grebes and acan being v/v
-nav being a better lynch candidate than cubs
and also be prepared to discuss
-other strong village reads that need to be lynched
-the possible need for a plan for getting both cubs and nav safely out of the game considering that we in all likelihood won't get a f3
is to not throw your vote willy nilly since for every single lynch moving forward
the game can be lost
so tell me if you agree with
-grebes and acan being v/v
-nav being a better lynch candidate than cubs
and also be prepared to discuss
-other strong village reads that need to be lynched
-the possible need for a plan for getting both cubs and nav safely out of the game considering that we in all likelihood won't get a f3
Official Day 5 Emergency Lynch Tally
cubs (2) - Frosty, dolphin
Nav (1) - FTF
3/8
lynch close in ~24 hours
cubs (2) - Frosty, dolphin
Nav (1) - FTF
3/8
lynch close in ~24 hours
and be sure as hell to have some actual bloody thought behind this
seeing that dubz and nav have never voted wolves
im going into look at those two in detail to see if it's legit
but i need you all to understand that the majority of the game has voted wolves so any moves to lynch them should be held under extreme scrutiny
which is why im so particular about cubs and barks being suggested as lynch targets
midwife pls
Idk Pippy had said several times I legit am not gonna be able to play so please kill me before this day. I thought it was a safe bet Bc I didn’t think she’d do that as a wolf. But whatevs that’s a whole different debate on ethical arguments in this game. Plus people will very easily jump on to an easy vote early especially D1 where there is less to go on even in an extended cycle. Nav is 100% not getting a vote from me. He did the same thing as Pippy at the beginning of the game and acted all weird. I’m not gonna vote there.
unlynch cubs
Bc I forgot we’re playing with majority or whatever and with less people voting there is less of a space for majority. Ugh.
Bc I forgot we’re playing with majority or whatever and with less people voting there is less of a space for majority. Ugh.
Also what’re you talking about Nav being lynchable?? Why would he not be.
people jumping on easy votes for easy reasons applies to wolves more than it applies to village
one of the biggest offenders is cubs, who voted pippy for absolute ****all and used what she was saying as an excuse
just because a villager can do it too doesnt make it any less of a point against him
as in the lynch target for today
meaning we dont think he's a wolf
@Animal Midwife what is the hammer count
does it shift because of the non-voters or not
You think cubs would let himself get restricted from lack of posting and be a wolf???
mj did
whether two wolves did,
is a different question
but i dont think we can read into that
@Animal Midwife what are your rules on angleshooting
MJ is entirely different Bc he legit already messed up in the beginning whether it was intentional or not it screwed him, I’d get restricted too. Maybe the kill mechanism was something he knew about so he did it on purpose.
WildZoo
Noble Dubz Dictator, Unyeetable Phasing Wolf
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
Didn't you just say you're still suspicious of nav? Wouldn't the same argument apply?
I think grebes is village, Idk what acanthy is but no way I’m ever voting there
I mean I feel like it only makes sense that the same person did both of those kill which definitely leads to the question of if it’s a third party that had to kill 1 village 1 wolf because I’m not sure how it makes sense as a wolf or village role
uhh doubt it
i think he just bailed bc he knew he ****ed up
because nobody knew what the punishment for not meeting the reqs were
and it was decisively minus ev for all sides
Suspicious as in him being a third party not a wolf.
dont like this post
i think the refusal to come to a logical conclusion here makes the post feel agenda driven
Hammer occurs at 5 votes today.
so it does shift with non-voters
note this for the future people
I hate angleshooting.
so no more punishment talk
got it
Okay well my point still stands it wouldn’t be in the best interest of a nonoutted wolf to do that.
WildZoo
Noble Dubz Dictator, Unyeetable Phasing Wolf
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
Why would a third party be more likely to allow an activity punishment to occur than a wolf?
WildZoo
Noble Dubz Dictator, Unyeetable Phasing Wolf
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
Lol whoops
Soo I’m not allowed to talk about it now Bc FTF asked??
ask midwife ig
but better safe than sorry
i'd call it angleshooting but her definition can differ from mine
