- Joined
- Jul 31, 2006
- Messages
- 281
- Reaction score
- 4
To those who have taken Step 1,
1. Do you think reading RR Pathology is better than reading both BRS Path and BRS Phys? A lot of the posts here have stated the fact that there isn't a lot of pure physiology on the exam, and the way Goljan integrates physiology, do you think there is enough physiology in the RR Pathology?
2. Or, do you think that BRS Physiology is still required even if you do use RR Path?
3. Has anyone ever used Pathophysiology 4 Boards and Wards? If so, what do you think? I have heard about it around my school here, but almost never on SDN. Just curious.
Thanks for your time.![Smile :) :)]()
1. Do you think reading RR Pathology is better than reading both BRS Path and BRS Phys? A lot of the posts here have stated the fact that there isn't a lot of pure physiology on the exam, and the way Goljan integrates physiology, do you think there is enough physiology in the RR Pathology?
2. Or, do you think that BRS Physiology is still required even if you do use RR Path?
3. Has anyone ever used Pathophysiology 4 Boards and Wards? If so, what do you think? I have heard about it around my school here, but almost never on SDN. Just curious.
Thanks for your time.