- Joined
- Jan 19, 2023
- Messages
- 77
- Reaction score
- 124
- Points
- 116
- Podiatry Student
Yup…. thats when I searched for jobs I never searched for “podiatrist” on Google Maps. I searched “doctor”, “clinic”, “hospital”, etc. so I could make my desperate podiatrist cold-call list 😅If you’re in a city, go ahead open the Google app and pin different specialties like dermatology/plastic vs podiatry. It’s a 1/3 ration with podiatry saturating the market.
Well, I'd imagine if he's going to a desirable place for vacation, someone else thought it was a desirable place to open a practice.I had an attending in residency who told me everytime he went on vacation, he'd check the area listings to see if there was a podiatrist in the area. Sure enough, no matter how small the town, he'd find someone
Keep looking! I found a place that I can't make any appointment for the next 3-4 weeks with infected ingrown paying cash. I called 6 offices in that area. But yes, podiatry is saturated for sure!If you’re in a city, go ahead open the Google app and pin different specialties like dermatology/plastic vs podiatry. It’s a 1/3 ratio with podiatry saturating the market.
Obviously this location needs a new podiatry school to help meet unmet demand.Keep looking! I found a place that I can't make any appointment for the next 3-4 weeks with infected ingrown paying cash. I called 6 offices in that area. But yes, podiatry is saturated for sure!
There are over 18k podiatrists working in USA... more practicing podiatrists than nearly any MD specialty besides the head-to-toe and primary care ones (FP, ER, OB, gen surg, rad, anesthesia, psych, etc):If you’re in a city, go ahead open the Google app and pin different specialties like dermatology/plastic vs podiatry. It’s a 1/3 ratio with podiatry saturating the market.
If I remember correctly, you guys have around 565 residency spots per year. We’ve been steady at around 465 for at least a decade.ophtho
It is a terrible thing because it drives down payer reimbursement and overall pay in general. It is the reason why after 4 years of undergrad and 4 years of podiatry school at the cost of 300k or more, and at least 3 years of post graduate training, a starting salary of $150,000 is usually considered "good."I think the saturation isn’t a terrible thing, it’ll force us to be better with the competition. We develop better relationships with our patients than the other undersaturated specialties that rely on PA/NPs to see their patients for them. While it might feel good to be so needed that you have assistants help you see your patients, it reduces your touch points with the patients and doesn’t allow you to build meaningful relationships.
I would tend to agree, and I actually structure my practice that way (all new pts get 30min, most f/u get 30min also unless really easy stuff).I think the saturation isn’t a terrible thing, it’ll force us to be better with the competition. We develop better relationships with our patients than the other undersaturated specialties that rely on PA/NPs to see their patients for them. While it might feel good to be so needed that you have assistants help you see your patients, it reduces your touch points with the patients and doesn’t allow you to build meaningful relationships.
100% ^^It is a terrible thing because it drives down payer reimbursement and overall pay in general. It is the reason why after 4 years of undergrad and 4 years of podiatry school at the cost of 300k or more, and at least 3 years of post graduate training, a starting salary of $150,000 is usually considered "good."
Saturation is bad and can destroy a profession that relies on fee for service payments. This concept is so basic that it is not even worth arguing.
Oh yay! More time to spend lotioning feet to beat out the competition!I think the saturation isn’t a terrible thing, it’ll force us to be better with the competition. We develop better relationships with our patients than the other undersaturated specialties that rely on PA/NPs to see their patients for them. While it might feel good to be so needed that you have assistants help you see your patients, it reduces your touch points with the patients and doesn’t allow you to build meaningful relationships.
From an extremely narrow and self-centered point of view yes saturation is bad because you can’t just be fed patients just by having a license. Is that in the best interest of the patients seeking help for foot and ankle problems? No. “Saturation” isn’t going away, if you wanna make a meaningful difference for your pocketbook, get good and earn your patients.
I don't disagree in theory... but why do you suppose every single MD specialty regulates its training spots and grads?From an extremely narrow and self-centered point of view yes saturation is bad because you can’t just be fed patients just by having a license. Is that in the best interest of the patients seeking help for foot and ankle problems? No. “Saturation” isn’t going away, if you wanna make a meaningful difference for your pocketbook, get good and earn your patients.
Oh so we're going to actually debate the pros and cons about saturation? Because up until a few days ago I thought we all spoke with one voice on this issue.From an extremely narrow and self-centered point of view yes saturation is bad because you can’t just be fed patients just by having a license. Is that in the best interest of the patients seeking help for foot and ankle problems? No. “Saturation” isn’t going away, if you wanna make a meaningful difference for your pocketbook, get good and earn your patients.
Is this a joke or are you for real lolI'm not sure if there are enough podiatrists currently. In my city, we have more podiatrists than orthopedic surgeons (all sub specialists). Despite this, we usually stay very busy. I am usually booked out very far, and usually see 6 people an hour. The only issue is keeping my dremel clean at the end of the day.
The problem that most people here on SDN don't understand is, for every patient they have two feet and ten toes! Orthopedic surgeons only have two knees or hips or shoulders.
My president would agree with this sentiment. I believe in his mission until we have more podiatrists in every city than Orthopedic surgeons. Until then, we must continue to push forward and open schools in the interest of public health.
Thank you
Is this a joke or are you for real lol
If you saw how busy myself and my colleagues are despite having almost the same number of PCPs in the city compared to podiatrists, you will realize why we need more schools. This agenda of saturation is way overblown.
Thank you
May I know what city you are practicing ? I would love to know the area if you don't mind. Thank you so muchI'm not sure if there are enough podiatrists currently. In my city, we have more podiatrists than orthopedic surgeons (all sub specialists). Despite this, we usually stay very busy. I am usually booked out very far, and usually see 6 people an hour. The only issue is keeping my dremel clean at the end of the day.
The problem that most people here on SDN don't understand is, for every patient they have two feet and ten toes! Orthopedic surgeons only have two knees or hips or shoulders.
My president would agree with this sentiment. I believe in his mission until we have more podiatrists in every city than Orthopedic surgeons. Until then, we must continue to push forward and open schools in the interest of public health.
Thank you
Time to put down the mcglamrys textbook and listen to some comedy podcasts my friendMay I know what city you are practicing ? I would love to know the area if you don't mind. Thank you so much
Tell me you're in Philadelphia or New York City without telling me you're in Philadelphia and New York City.A few weeks ago, I had to drop off and pick up a friend who was having some oral surgery.
His oral surgeon was in a professional complex of multiple one story buildings all accessed via one parking lot.
I drove around the complex and there were 6 different Podiatric practices in the same complex!
Two of the offices had doors adjacent to one another. So if you walked in the wrong door you’d be in a different DPM office.
Amazing.
This is a bad take. Tell this to the vast majority of the residency and fellowship graduations who just paid $300,000 or more do school and then dedicated 3 or 4 more years of post graduate training. Tell them that the reason they only got offers for 80k-120k that they need to get good and earn their patients first.From an extremely narrow and self-centered point of view yes saturation is bad because you can’t just be fed patients just by having a license. Is that in the best interest of the patients seeking help for foot and ankle problems? No. “Saturation” isn’t going away, if you wanna make a meaningful difference for your pocketbook, get good and earn your patients.
You stated this perfectly! I’m so tired of hearing people say that you have to “earn your dues” in podiatry. People in this profession have become so complacent in this type of attitude that it’s perpetuated as normal and people just accept it. Graduates shouldn’t have to fight for jobs and get low ball offers, because as stated the MD/DOs surely aren’t sitting around talking about earning patients.This is a bad take. Tell this to the vast majority of the residency and fellowship graduations who just paid $300,000 or more do school and then dedicated 3 or 4 more years of post graduate training. Tell them that the reason they only got offers for 80k-120k that they need to get good and earn their patients first.
Then tell all other medicine and surgeon residency and fellowship grads that they need to get good and earn their patients. See what the urologist says. Or the interventional cardiologist. Or the family medicine doc. Do they need to get good added 300,000 of debt and 3+ years of post graduate training?
Yeah, I don't get it.This is a bad take. Tell this to the vast majority of the residency and fellowship graduations who just paid $300,000 or more do school and then dedicated 3 or 4 more years of post graduate training. Tell them that the reason they only got offers for 80k-120k that they need to get good and earn their patients first....
I’m not in Philadelphia or NYC.Tell me you're in Philadelphia or New York City without telling me you're in Philadelphia and New York City.
This is a bad take. Tell this to the vast majority of the residency and fellowship graduations who just paid $300,000 or more do school and then dedicated 3 or 4 more years of post graduate training. Tell them that the reason they only got offers for 80k-120k that they need to get good and earn their patients first.
Then tell all other medicine and surgeon residency and fellowship grads that they need to get good and earn their patients. See what the urologist says. Or the interventional cardiologist. Or the family medicine doc. Do they need to get good added 300,000 of debt and 3+ years of post graduate training?
Stated nicely. People see it, those that disagree with what you said are choosing to be delusional.Yeah, I don't get it.
The "put in your time," "earn your dues," "market yourself," "your time will come" talk is for employers and owners looking to grind down employee salaries.
To hear other DPMs who are out grinding and working say that sort of "anti-competitive" and "just try harder" stuff is really disappointing IMO.![]()
95% of the DPMs I know try pretty hard every day. Many try very hard as they are running a biz or doing marketing/networking or inpatient work or multiple locations/hospitals commuting as they don't have the demand and volume and income they want - or they're working hard not to lose volume they built to highly competitive nearby colleagues. Saturation is rough.
Even the "lucky" hospital employee DPMs make roughly 25-75% of what most MD surgeons make per RVU and have much fewer location choices as good podiatry jobs get HUGE application demand. I wonder if they should also be silent and happy with that? 🤐
People simply want to learn good skills, use their skills, and get paid for it.
Podiatry struggles on all three aspects. We need better training, more volume/patients per doc (esp surgery), and better pay/ROI.
Increasing our saturation just makes it all worse (training, patient demand, compensation all suffer). Everyone should eaaasily see that. 🙁
Again, MD surgery programs don't have this problem. They regulate their residency spots and standards....Saturation was gonna happen thanks to the low hanging fruit of “you get to do surgery”. I think APMA did a great job marketing that, and it’s true we do have the opportunity to do surgery. It brought a lot of people to the party, and now that we have reached a magical threshold where saturation is palpable but impossible to define, what do we do about it? None of this is gonna change due to the nature of the work and complaining about saturation isn’t going to make meaningful change. ...
How many rural areas do you think there are in America? Do you want to live somewhere terrible in New Mexico or near an Indian reservation or somewhere where there is hardly any patient population just to make a living? I don't. Your wife doesn't. Your kids don't either. Come on man.I’m not hating on the doom and gloom posts, I think saturation is a real problem as Feli so thoroughly summarized using pharmacy as a case study, but the winners are the patients especially in rural areas who now have access to foot and ankle surgical care thanks to saturation, where 3-year trained podiatrists are going to rural areas on a salary cheaper than ortho. The only reason we have this opportunity as a profession is people just hate dealing with feet. You bought into it when you joined the profession. I think you guys on SDN did a good job expressing the saturation problem and it got the leaders’ attention. To fix it means waiting for old leadership to retire and for us to take leadership positions, create meaningful policy, and enact change for the future generation. I won’t be surprised if one of us on SDN here becomes the future president of APMA, ACFAS, or CPME. I think saturation is bad for us, but i also think single-sided thinking can be bad too, and if we over-regulate it could be bad for us too
Drop the mic. Enough said right here. Facts.Nope. There's no good way to spin the Podiatry saturation problem.
No way I would recommend this profession to an undergrad. In fact, I would strongly weigh the option of turning back as a 1st year?, 2nd year pod student?
It's going to be extremely hard to service those high interest student loans when it takes you several years to get up to speed. ROI just isn't there for most people anymore.
After my first few yrs of solo PP I've now got 3 other pods and 2 F/A ortho within a mile away. 75K pop.
I had a 1st year ortho resident as patient a few months ago. She said that F/A fellowship is becoming very popular (in her program at least).
What could be done to better preserve the profession? Could the podiatry powers create a moratorium on residencies like MD specialities have in past ?
Truth is, it wouldn't matter if they closed 3 schools tomorrow.
I hate to see all the gloomy posts on here but it's an honest representation of the current state of affairs.
Bingo… you guys are on fire tonight!When you open the floodgates to a bunch of students with average GPA's and MCAT's and tell them they can be a surgeon this is what happens. It's fun for them to call themselves "foot and ankle surgeons" in their IG bio. And honestly a lot of them have no business doing some of these cases with the training they got. I bet a lot would have not even applied if they were told from the start the truth about surgery and the compensation you'll actually get
Not denial. Just delusion. Well stated.How many rural areas do you think there are in America? Do you want to live somewhere terrible in New Mexico or near an Indian reservation or somewhere where there is hardly any patient population just to make a living? I don't. Your wife doesn't. Your kids don't either. Come on man.
Any MD/DO right now can move anywhere in the country that is desirable and probably find a job. That does not exist for podiatry. Because anywhere that is desirable already has 10-20x amount of podiatrists that are actually needed. It is so abundantly clear I just don't even know what to say to someone like yourself anymore. It is pure denial.
Everywhere I have practiced (which has been two hospital employed positions thankfully) I have dealt with fierce pushback from local private and even fellow employed podiatrists because they were threatened about losing volume to me. Do you think MD/DO doctors act childish and feel threatened as easily as we do? It is rather pathetic.
We are over saturated. We have more fellowship programs than AOFAS does. New fellowship programs are being created on an annual basis. Not because it is about education but because it is about taking advantage of cheap labor. Our fellowship grads are ending up in private practice. This will continue to be the trend and it will get worse and worse. This affects everyone. It will affect you when your contract is up and you try and negotiate a better salary and your admin looks at you and says no because they know they can get 100 applicants the next day if they put your job out on the market. 300-500 if it is desirable hospital job.
I am hospital employed and my salary is half of what a foot and ankle ortho MD makes. My RVU dollar rate is probably $20 less as well. But I am racking up 900-1000 RVUs per month. Making good money for my family and I but when you add up all the bonuses and salary it may be a little more than the base salary of a foot and ankle ortho MD. I want more money. But what leverage do I really have with admin at my hospital? They know what the deal is. They can replace me if they want to.
I’m not sure how old you are but don’t you think it’s way more older podiatrist than you that are in line for those leadership roles I mean come onI’m not hating on the doom and gloom posts, I think saturation is a real problem as Feli so thoroughly summarized using pharmacy as a case study, but the winners are the patients especially in rural areas who now have access to foot and ankle surgical care thanks to saturation, where 3-year trained podiatrists are going to rural areas on a salary cheaper than ortho. The only reason we have this opportunity as a profession is people just hate dealing with feet. You bought into it when you joined the profession. I think you guys on SDN did a good job expressing the saturation problem and it got the leaders’ attention. To fix it means waiting for old leadership to retire and for us to take leadership positions, create meaningful policy, and enact change for the future generation. I won’t be surprised if one of us on SDN here becomes the future president of APMA, ACFAS, or CPME. I think saturation is bad for us, but i also think single-sided thinking can be bad too, and if we over-regulate it could be bad for us too
When you open the floodgates to a bunch of students with average GPA's and MCAT's and tell them they can be a surgeon this is what happens. It's fun for them to call themselves "foot and ankle surgeons" in their IG bio. And honestly a lot of them have no business doing some of these cases with the training they got. I bet a lot would have not even applied if they were told from the start the truth about surgery and the compensation you'll actually get
Meanwhile in the 4-6 hours you're stuck in the hospital, you could have done ingrowns, warts, plantar fasciitis. Its no coincidence that PP owners dont ball out these cases and pass them along. The next day back pain also isnt worth it.I can sleep well at night giving up a $300 reimbursement after insurance
Who the hell is "you guys"?I’m not hating on the doom and gloom posts, I think saturation is a real problem as Feli so thoroughly summarized using pharmacy as a case study, but the winners are the patients especially in rural areas who now have access to foot and ankle surgical care thanks to saturation, where 3-year trained podiatrists are going to rural areas on a salary cheaper than ortho. The only reason we have this opportunity as a profession is people just hate dealing with feet. You bought into it when you joined the profession. I think you guys on SDN did a good job expressing the saturation problem and it got the leaders’ attention. To fix it means waiting for old leadership to retire and for us to take leadership positions, create meaningful policy, and enact change for the future generation. I won’t be surprised if one of us on SDN here becomes the future president of APMA, ACFAS, or CPME. I think saturation is bad for us, but i also think single-sided thinking can be bad too, and if we over-regulate it could be bad for us too
ExactlyMeanwhile in the 4-6 hours you're stuck in the hospital, you could have done ingrowns, warts, plantar fasciitis. Its no coincidence that PP owners dont ball out these cases and pass them along. The next day back pain also isnt worth it.