Not to interject to a question you're phrasing to him, but obviously not. IM residency's greatest strength and weakness (IMO) is its versatility. There are competencies but then which ones apply to you specifically when you have a focus on one area? In EM, for example, you're doing a very similar job whereas in IM there are literally 4 distinctly different career paths (fellowship, outpatient PCP, hospitalist, and academic hybrid) each requiring a fundamentally different skillset. Ultimately what makes IM residency demanding is that residency is ideally supposed to prepare you for all of them which is a very broad skillset, but in reality no one is actually standardizing the process so every resident doesn't necessarily have mastery in all the areas, but enough to get back provided they follow the four golden rules
1.) Pristine documentation
2.) Orders/Consults done and followed up on before afternoon rounds
3.) If something new arises, have a basic interpretation and present it to the attending accurately while providing timely care if needed.
4.) If something is clearly X (ex. DKA), find a validated treatment for X (ex. table 1 of DKA on Uptodate) and do it.
The rest like procedures, knowing which antibiotic to use, the ability to interpret CXRs/EKGs, etc. are not skills IM residents are tested on in a standardized way. It would be nice for them to know how to do these things but procedure teams, consultants, radiology reads, etc. are all available to allow residents to skate by.