- Joined
- Sep 18, 2006
- Messages
- 71
- Reaction score
- 0
So I have been getting mixed opinions about the second look thing on the trail.
A few PD's have said outright that whoever invented the second look was an dingus - they don't have time and resources to show the program a second time to 100 more applicants and that they'd prefer that candidates not take a second look unless absolutely necessary in their decision-making process.
A few other PD's have insinuated that if the applicant is really interested in the program a second look will help confirm that the interest is genuine.
The problem is that I'm completely out of both time and money for interviewing, plus I feel that I got an adequate glimpse of the programs that I'm interested in on my first look (including obs time in the ED). Does anybody involved in the ranking process know about this? Will refusing to spend extra resources on an unnecessary second look come back to bite me in the ass later on?
A few PD's have said outright that whoever invented the second look was an dingus - they don't have time and resources to show the program a second time to 100 more applicants and that they'd prefer that candidates not take a second look unless absolutely necessary in their decision-making process.
A few other PD's have insinuated that if the applicant is really interested in the program a second look will help confirm that the interest is genuine.
The problem is that I'm completely out of both time and money for interviewing, plus I feel that I got an adequate glimpse of the programs that I'm interested in on my first look (including obs time in the ED). Does anybody involved in the ranking process know about this? Will refusing to spend extra resources on an unnecessary second look come back to bite me in the ass later on?