- Joined
- May 2, 2017
- Messages
- 148
- Reaction score
- 62
Oh excuse me.....75% get accepted post interview instead of 70%. Thank you for taking the time to upload a chart to correct me on that super important discrepancy.
But what you said was
But how you come across, anyone who scores a 500 on there mcat and has a 3.0 GPA is pathetic and shouldn't be aloud to become a physician and these are the kind of students SGU picks, which is far from the truth. If you want to inform pre-meds then give an honest opinion not your carib bios attitude.
Oh excuse me.....75% get accepted post interview instead of 70%. Thank you for taking the time to upload a chart to correct me on that super important discrepancy.
SGU Reports in 2017 Average MCAT is 23 which is equal to about a 496. Besides being low is suspect as the new MCAT has been now in use for 2.5 years.
GPA average is self reported at 3.3 overall, 3.2 science.
Enrollment and Demographics - School of Medicine | St. George's University
View attachment 224346
View attachment 224347
I wish I could get a breakdown on the applicants - matriculants. I suspect there is a fraction of reasonable MD candiates with MCAT/GPA who didnt apply broadly/widely and simply went to SGU in same cycle.Additionally, with AAMC stating that a 500 MCAT is the threshold for being likely to successfully complete medical school, having a mean of 496 is pretty bad. That means they are willingly taking many students who have very little hope of completing med school, which is then seen in their terrible attrition and match rates.
The interview at SGU usually is by associate admissions director/recruiter or, more commonly, alumni doctor where their basic tenet do you think the applicant has basic skill set that may make a good physician. I have not seen their review sheet in several years but it was
I wish I could get a breakdown on the applicants - matriculants. I suspect there is a fraction of reasonable MD candiates with MCAT/GPA who didnt apply broadly/widely and simply went to SGU in same cycle.
But what you said was
But how you come across, anyone who scores a 500 on there mcat and has a 3.0 GPA is pathetic and shouldn't be aloud to become a physician and these are the kind of students SGU picks, which is far from the truth. If you want to inform pre-meds then give an honest opinion not your carib bios attitude.
I suggest re-reading the thread because I never made that comment, that was someone else.
But I do consider averages of 3.3/3.2/496 for a medical school as abysmal. If those are the averages then that means half the class has stats less than that and they have no business being a physician, and shame on the school for accepting such individuals never intending for them to finish and to simply be a tuition check until they fail out.
To this add:Don't go to the Caribbean. Read these posts to learn why:
gonnif's Analysis of the Caribbean Route (read this carefully and in detail to know why going to the Caribbean is a very bad idea)
WedgeDawg's Argument Against Going to Medical School in the Caribbean (see also: Caribbean Cycle Theory)
I suggest re-reading the thread because I never made that comment, that was someone else.
But I do consider averages of 3.3/3.2/496 for a medical school as abysmal. If those are the averages then that means half the class has stats less than that and they have no business being a physician, and shame on the school for accepting such individuals never intending for them to finish and to simply be a tuition check until they fail out.
Funny because that those are roughly the average stats of many of the DO school matriculants whom you vehemently defend.
In 2016, the mean sGPA for DO matriculants was 3.50 and a 3.56 overall. If you only include undergraduate work, that goes to a 3.45 and a 3.54. Not quite the 3.3/3.2 you're talking about. Also, the mean MCAT was a 502, which is more than a standard deviation above a 496 (SD 5.56). Now a 502 isn't amazing, but it is above the AAMC threshold for likely success in medical school, while a 496 is most certainly not.
http://www.aacom.org/docs/default-s...riculant-profile-summary-report.pdf?sfvrsn=10
At the DO school I used to attend during orientation we were told that the average GPA was a 3.3 (they didn't break down science vs non science) and the average MCAT was a 25 (old scale). Granted this was one of the newer osteopathic schools, but was merely two years ago so I would guess that some DO programs still have averages around this.
Alright, but I'd imagine a 2.9, SMP and 514+ could possibly get into a low tier md school. This assumes a reasonably good mcat retakeI consider applicants with MCAT below 500 and GPA under 3.2 "absolutely abysmal" stats. These are SGU's peeps.
Low-tier MD? No way. Maybe the newer DO programs
I think the only thing they look at is making sure your check doesn’t bounce
Funny because that those are roughly the average stats of many of the DO school matriculants whom you vehemently defend.
At the DO school I used to attend during orientation we were told that the average GPA was a 3.3 (they didn't break down science vs non science) and the average MCAT was a 25 (old scale). Granted this was one of the newer osteopathic schools, but was merely two years ago so I would guess that some DO programs still have averages around this.
So it's not just as simple as saying Caribbean programs are admitting students with stats too low to expect success.
Dead or dying applicants can't pay.
Totally not cool that you can be dead and vote in Chicago, but can't be dead and get into SGU.
I have nothing against those who graduate and become practicing physicians, they are just like any other doc. The problem with the Carib is the very predatory nature of the schools, the terrible attrition, and absolutely brutal match rates.
The Carib is a last ditch Hail Mary, and should only be suggested to those students who have tried every other option first. It is disingenuous to suggest it to pre-meds who haven't tried the much safer options first.
People want affirmation of their choices, even if they're bad/highly risky ones.I never understand people who take it as a personal insult when people point out problems with their chosen academic institution. It just reeks of immaturity.
People who've followed me on here for a while know I've had a lot of very non-positive things to say about the LCME school that I attended.
People want affirmation of their choices, even if they're bad/highly risky ones.
This isn't true. Three quarters of those who apply still get turned down. That's why the other offshore schools are able to stay in business.
This isn't true. Three quarters of those who apply still get turned down. That's why the other offshore schools are able to stay in business.
Wow that’s a lot of bounced checks
Per SGU's website
100 apply
57 get interviewed
43 get accepted (75% of interviewed)
24 matriculate (55% of accepted)
In comparison, this is 5-10 times the matriculation rate of US MD
Yes all relative except of course that we are talking about medical schools so connecting this UG institutions is relatively sillyIt's all relative. A 43% percent acceptance rate is lower than the acceptance rate of a vast majority of undergraduate universities. I guess by your logic NYU, UCSD, and Brandeis will also take anyone with a pulse as well.
Yes all relative except of course that we are talking about medical schools so connecting this UG institutions is relatively silly
PMS, I love the post, but do try to not get squashed by the Banhammer! TOS violation and all that.Choice-supportive bias - Wikipedia
Just because you were a huge ****** who decided to transfer from DO to a SGU does not give you the right to give others the faulty and outright wrong advice about Carribean schools. Kindly **** off.
Well we are discussing medical schools so comparing them sense, unlike your tirad. You may have notice that I deal with the data provided by SGU trying to keep to the facts and discussion at hand. You may also notice that I frequently say while I am not a fan of these off shore schools but I do not rule them out. I just want to make sure that prospective students see these school with open eyes.One thing that has never ceased to amaze me since I first became interested in this profession is the way in which it is routinely put on a pedestal by others. Being a physician is just another job that most people with an average amount of intelligence are capable of practicing. I have no idea why it has become a racket for people with elitist, chauvinistic tendencies.
Choice-supportive bias - Wikipedia
Just because you were a huge ****** who decided to transfer from DO to SGU does not give you the right to give others the faulty and outright wrong advice about Carribean schools. Kindly **** off.
PMS, I love the post, but do try to not get squashed by the Banhammer! TOS violation and all that.
If we posit that medical education is a racket, then it has turned into an art form by the Carib schools.
I am perhaps the only sdn user (or one of very few) at this time who has experienced studying at both a stateside and offshore medical school.
Lol, you have no experience studying at an offshore school. You made the worst decision in SDN history, stop trying to get others to do the same. Your only experience with SGU is maximum two-three months of rotations.
lol this freaking guy...you are going to go to Harvard Medical School (Princeton doesn't even have a medical school FYI), I would say my input is immeasurably more valuable than yours...
Seems pretty hypocritical of you to say that no? I literally saw you commending a post earlier today titled ("a taste of medicine" or something like that) written about some guy's experiences in medical school since he started not even 2 months ago. Considering your last comment to me, I guess now you are going to have to go back and tell him that he too has no experience studying in medical school. LMAO
Lol you made the claim you studied at an offshore school, how are your stateside rotations in American hospitals giving you any offshore school studying experience? Oh that's right, none.