Non-TradTulsa said:Nobody can plan a life further ahead than 20 years.
Nor can any of us guarantee that we'll be around long enough to carry out even the most short-range plans.
Congrats, Non-TradTulsa, and may your hard work (continue to) pay off.
Non-TradTulsa said:Nobody can plan a life further ahead than 20 years.
Flopotomist said:I think the view that "non-trad" is equal to slacker could not be farther from the truth. I certainly was not a slacker - I was non-trad because when I was 18 I didn't know what I wanted to do. I spent 10 years travelling the world, working overseas, doing research, exploring a few different careers, and THEN returning to complete some prereqs.
I had no problems on the application trail, and think I will be a stronger med. student BECAUSE I have seen more of the world than the average 22 year old.
Compozine said:So your top choice was Stritch....congrats. However, this little stab is pretty pointless because my top choice where I am waitlisted is a top 10 school. Please don't resort to childish insults...
Gee, Panda, after I re-read my soapbox "I pulled myself up by my own bootstraps" rant, I realized that someone had finally goaded me into letting my rarely-seen conservative side show - I was hoping you'd like it.Panda Bear said:Kee-rist. Didn't any of you date girls, party, drink, or do anything when you were young other than devote all your energies to the single-mided pursuit of a future career?
Panda Bear said:For the record, I was a slacker when I was 18. That's how I ended up getting kicked out of college in 1983.
Kee-rist. Didn't any of you date girls, party, drink, or do anything when you were young other than devote all your energies to the single-mided pursuit of a future career?
Avalanche21 said:dude, settle down...a bit unnecessary. Besides, I'm assuming you're referring to USC (from one of your other posts), which is a good school, but not top 10...
Compozine said:Most people applying to medical school are "nontraditional." When my father went to med school 35 years ago, virtually everyone in his class came right out of college. People knew by the time they were 18 or 19 that they wanted to be doctors, and they went straight through the premed program without taking time off afterwards, etc. There were no post-bacs to salvage a bad GPA, and nobody took a year off to "find themselves." Why is it that it is now actually difficult to find an applicant who applied straight out of college? Also, do medical schools recognize the difference between students who take the MCAT during a full college courseload, and those who take a year or two off just to study? I am not critisizing the non traditionals, I am just curious why that have actually become the norm.
Avalanche21 said:dude, settle down...a bit unnecessary. Besides, I'm assuming you're referring to USC (from one of your other posts), which is a good school, but not top 10...
jbrice1639 said:i don't even know if he was referring to any specific school...probably just trying to sound like a badass...i think he was just feeling a little "phallically inferior" after starting this thread and having no one agree with his little rant.
Compozine said:My point was, you don't know who you are talking to on these posts, and getting into Stritch (certainly admirable) is not the same as being waitlisted at an ivy.
Compozine said:So your top choice was Stritch....congrats. However, this little stab is pretty pointless because my top choice where I am waitlisted is a top 10 school. Please don't resort to childish insults...
jackieMD2007 said:This is flat-out uncalled for.
You have a right to your opinion and to work out your thinking about touchy issues, but NOT to put down schools where other applicants have been accepted. 👎
Compozine said:getting into Stritch (certainly admirable) is not the same as being waitlisted at an ivy.
QuikClot said:All I am getting off this thread, with its various generalizations, rationalizations, and justifications, is a strong scent of fear, mostly from the 22-year-olds who don't want to compete with non-traditional students. As you can dress this up as "they should have known" or "we're going to work longer" or whatever you like, but, bottom line, it's just you complaining about the level of competition you have to face.
The final answer to "Why are they there?" is simply; the medical schools want them there. Med schools have decided that there are more predictors of a future physican's performance than grades, MCAT, and interview. This is an intimidating thing to the youngn's, because while old people can study hard and ace the MCAT, they cannot "ace" life experience, cannot suddenly pull a successful career out of the hat, or an advanced degree, etc.
Some people are going to call this "political correctness," but frankly, having worked in the healthcare system for many years, I can tell you that the skills necessary to be a good physican have little to do with the skills necessary to get a 4.0 or a stellar MCAT score. Smart is good; smart is necessary. But it is not the be-all and end-all, so say I and so say the AdComs.
TCIrish03 said:That's a pretty big brush you are painting with.
Not every non-trad is a dirty hippie who slacked off in college. Some busted their ass and still got average-sub par grades. Others don't have mommy and daddy floating the bill and have to get some work experience under their belt first. And some people much like yourself (uh oh) with that mentality actually burn out and need to take some time off before reloading for medical school.
About the only thing I agree with what you said is that being a doctor is a vocation, much like being a priest, rabbi, etc. And when determining your vocation, sometimes it takes alot of thought, prayer and discernment to find yourself, to determine what your talents are and how they can best be applied to your life serving others. Wisdom is supposed to come with maturity, and I would much rather be served by a 35 year old student who took a while, but is fully committed, as opposed to someone who their whole life did nothing except focus on just "getting into" medical school, then entering their practice and realizing they hate it, only to have it reflect on their patients.
Lastly, I hope your patients' families and your insurance carrier are more forgiving of you when you make your first mistake (I don't know a doctor who hasn't), than you are of non-traditional students.
Compozine said:getting into Stritch (certainly admirable) is not the same as being waitlisted at an ivy.
Compozine said:And what did this poster do?
LizzyM said:by itself
MollyMalone said:OK, everybody chill.
![]()
If this thread degenerates further, it's going to be closed.
Compozine said:Key phrase. Look, I did not want to fight with you. Obviously this is a touchy issue because many of you are non trads. I intended this post to attact people my age who had noticed a similar trend, not to start a flame war with a bunch of people. You made a cheep shot comment about how you got into your first choice, "unlike me." What kind of response do you expect to get. I know everyone on this site right now will disagree with me because you are all older premeds. This thread turned to s@#t so fast!!!!
Compozine said:Key phrase. Look, I did not want to fight with you. Obviously this is a touchy issue because many of you are non trads. I intended this post to attact people my age who had noticed a similar trend, not to start a flame war with a bunch of people. You made a cheep shot comment about how you got into your first choice, "unlike me." What kind of response do you expect to get. I know everyone on this site right now will disagree with me because you are all older premeds. This thread turned to s@#t so fast!!!!

Oooh. 250,000 mg Extra Strength.MollyMalone said:OK, everybody chill.
![]()
If this thread degenerates further, it's going to be closed.
ND2005 said:I'm not an older pre-med. I'm 23. You don't have to be old to see that you're acting like an idiot.
Compozine said:I think the world has become a very PC place. Don't get me wrong, I think it is wonderful that women and minorities are entering medicine in growing numbers. But I think there is this emphasis now on "don't worry, you can still be a doctor" mentality. It used to be that your performance in college was a direct indicator of how you would handle medical school. I just don't understand why now, with competition fiercer than ever, we have this "no problem if you have a low GPA" attitude. These post bac programs make it so people can go do the premed program all over again if they didn't do well the first time. What about the people who did well with only one shot?
I also have to wonder if these people who insist they "need time to figure out if medicine is really what they want to do" really should be choosing medicine. Medicine is a calling, and I don't think you should have to work 10 years at some other unrelated job to figure out that you actually want to be a doctor. I mean, at one of my interviews there was a 47 year old woman who had had five prior carreers (including concert violinist, engineer, accountant, bussiness owner, and teacher), and then just woke up one day and said, "hey, I think I will give medicine a try." I don't know, the seats in med school are all precious, and I don't think it is right to give them away to a person who is just doing it to add another career to the list.
eastsidaz said:Be fair to him. If you look at the original post, he wasn't badmouthing anyone, just making a point. He isn't even knocking the people with families and careers, he's knocking the people who slacked in college who went the post-bac route. I think my economic argument (see above) should be the final word on this.
Compozine said:My point was, you don't know who you are talking to on these posts, and getting into Stritch (certainly admirable) is not the same as being waitlisted at an ivy.