- Joined
- Aug 12, 2004
- Messages
- 3,049
- Reaction score
- 6,409
Classic SDN. It’s a freaking LMA. Not how I do my standard total joints, but big friggin’ whupty doo.
Classic SDN. It’s a freaking LMA. Not how I do my standard total joints, but big friggin’ whupty doo.
And oh yeah, once the LMA is in you need very little sedation to maintain it. In fact, I find patients tolerate them much better than oral airways!
Dude, get over yourself.I'll just leave it at this: You have a lot to learn, not the least of which is getting over your arrogance in thinking you know better than everyone else (see above - you are directly contradicting people, including Blade, who were practicing while you were probably in Huggies), and thinking your practice is far and away the best and safest without even seeing the "other side." I hope for your patients' sake you open yourself up to learning and modifying your practices based on experiences of others -- or at the very least acknowledging and seeing the utility in other practices, even if you don't adopt them yourself.
Watch out, the first year graduate is about to drop some knowledge bombs on you. Take cover.
What a douche
Bag on me all you want virtually nobody does a GETA + Neuraxial
Is there a time and place for everything? Sure, but it’s out there an pretty uncommon. The reason i can say this with quite a bit of certainty is bc i contacted folks back in residency in addition to friends all over the country. The CRNAs here do GETA + SAB every single time they do certain cases. I do the same with sedation (propofol 25-50 mcg/kg/min), rarely need an oral airway much less LMA/OETT.
It’s unnecessary and the other guys do it so they can bill for both and keep the OB happy
Though there’s a time and place for many practices, the one I’m describing which seems to be similar to yours, is a little off the beaten path IMO
I don't see the difference between sedating with an oral airway or not.It’s not.
It’s not.
UCSF recently did a large retrospective analysis of their total joints and found that PF morphine does help with postoperative pain scores, ambulation distance, etc, even in addition to multimodal analgesia. As with all things in medicine, I'm sure the true best practice is somewhere in the middle between adding 500 mcg of Duramorph and completely avoiding it altogether.
Disagree
Forget the LMA, you’d say it’s common to tube spinals?
No I’m referring to LMA/spinal. It is very common. I’ve been out a long time, work in a practice with partners from all 10 top 5 programs. We all do it. I know for a fact that the regional guru at your old program also did it.
You’re 100% incorrect. Nobody ever placed LMAs + spinals much less OETT. In fact, i contacted the regional guru about this very thing a couple months ago. He didn’t say he’d NEVER do it, rather a general + SAB is unnecessary but if the patient was obstructing then he’d consider it
What code are they using to bill for the "post-op pain" spinal??
I don't think there's a code that lets you bill for it like a PNB - at least not one worth 7 units.
I don’t know for certain. Likely the “single injection of a diagnostic or therapeutic substance, not including neurolytic substances, directly into the subarachnoid or epidural space.” CPT 62311 for 8 RVUs.
You need long acting opioid for 62311. At least in our practice.
This thread makes me very happy to be an employee of an AMC. I neither know, nor care, about billing.
That’s what the billing company is for.This thread makes me very happy to be an employee of an AMC. I neither know, nor care, about billing.
It’s not just the billing shenanigans, I work in a hospital that is anything but efficient. I spend a good portion of my day drinking coffee in the lounge, waiting for cases/room turnover. If I was in an eat what u kill setup that would kill me. Now I can just chill.
Translation: I'm happy 'cuz I'm too ignorant to know just how hard I'm taking it in the rear.
To bill it as post op pain you will have to subtract out the time in the o.r. spent placing the spinal, you will need a follow up visit, and you will not get paid much.
How’s this for ethics:
Just did a right total knee for a 91 year old (had left done a few months ago). Nice little spinal with ACB and a bit of propofol. Turned off the prop and she says, “ that wasn’t bad, now I’ve get to get to work on these shoulders”
Wow, you're so cool. I had the exact same case not too far back. Frail little old 91 year old. Did a spinal then ran a low dose prop gtt. VS were train tracks, woke up perfectly comfortable. Perfectly stable in PACU and that whole night. Massive MI POD 1. I guess I'm not a badass like you.How’s this for ethics:
Just did a right total knee for a 91 year old (had left done a few months ago). Nice little spinal with ACB and a bit of propofol. Turned off the prop and she says, “ that wasn’t bad, now I’ve get to get to work on these shoulders”
Wow, you're so cool. I had the exact same case not too far back. Frail little old 91 year old. Did a spinal then ran a low dose prop gtt. VS were train tracks, woke up perfectly comfortable. Perfectly stable in PACU and that whole night. Massive MI POD 1. I guess I'm not a badass like you.
I think its not as unethical as that.The issue I have isn’t with putting an LMA in after the SAB (though it’s unnecessary the vast majority of the time IMO), it’s with billing the SAB for postop pain and a GA (especially when we are talking about a plain bupi spinal). That is subjecting a patient to an unnecessary procedure (either the SAB or the GA) for the sole purpose of billing them more. It’s unethical and it’s bushleague bullshi* period.
I think its not as unethical as that.
Like try to argue the opposite.
That a spinal with plain bupi gives 0 post op pain relief? Good luck with that.
I think we've all been stung by someone hanging around pacu for hours with what you thought was a low dose spinal.
So if the opposite definitely is not true, then maybe there is something to it?