- Joined
- Mar 22, 2016
- Messages
- 254
- Reaction score
- 975
Hello!
I am currently pre-writing my Stanford secondary and I am working on the following question:
---
What do you see as the most likely practice scenario for your future medical career? Choose the single answer that best describes your career goals and clinical practice setting:
---
I'm having a pretty hard time with it ... and I think because it feels like, in part, I am committing to one of these forever. But I think the struggle also comes with not exactly knowing what each of these entails.
I have a large amount of teaching experience and I am certain that I want to teach, in some capacity, for the rest of my life. So, I was initially drawn to Academic Medicine (Clinical), thinking about clinician-educator pathways. But, is this dangerous to say if I don't have an express interest in conducting research? Would it be alright to focus heavily on the teaching aspect and gloss over the idea of leading a high-powered lab? I understand that there are indeed clinician-educator pathways (in residency, I think?) that do not require research. Also - half of my personal statement and another secondary talk about teaching and mentoring students, for context. Teaching is already a large part of my application.
Would I be better off talking about public health/community health, another practice that I am interested in, even though I do not have much experience there? I can explain the interest, but I cannot draw on real-world experience for it. But, I could talk about public education and how I am excited to educate communities.
So, I guess my question is this: is it dangerous to choose academic medicine (clinical) and only talk about teaching? Or, should I choose something else and just tie teaching into it?
How did other people approach this question?
Thank you so much!
I am currently pre-writing my Stanford secondary and I am working on the following question:
---
What do you see as the most likely practice scenario for your future medical career? Choose the single answer that best describes your career goals and clinical practice setting:
- Academic Medicine (Clinical)
- Academic Medicine (Physician Scientist)
- Non-Academic Clinical Practice
- Health Policy
- Health Administration
- Primary Care
- Public Health/Community Health
- Global Health
---
I'm having a pretty hard time with it ... and I think because it feels like, in part, I am committing to one of these forever. But I think the struggle also comes with not exactly knowing what each of these entails.
I have a large amount of teaching experience and I am certain that I want to teach, in some capacity, for the rest of my life. So, I was initially drawn to Academic Medicine (Clinical), thinking about clinician-educator pathways. But, is this dangerous to say if I don't have an express interest in conducting research? Would it be alright to focus heavily on the teaching aspect and gloss over the idea of leading a high-powered lab? I understand that there are indeed clinician-educator pathways (in residency, I think?) that do not require research. Also - half of my personal statement and another secondary talk about teaching and mentoring students, for context. Teaching is already a large part of my application.
Would I be better off talking about public health/community health, another practice that I am interested in, even though I do not have much experience there? I can explain the interest, but I cannot draw on real-world experience for it. But, I could talk about public education and how I am excited to educate communities.
So, I guess my question is this: is it dangerous to choose academic medicine (clinical) and only talk about teaching? Or, should I choose something else and just tie teaching into it?
How did other people approach this question?
Thank you so much!