- Joined
- Mar 20, 2005
- Messages
- 153
- Reaction score
- 0
I have been accepted to med school for 2006, is it beneficial if i started looking at some netter's anatomy stuff, since everyone seems to complain about gross anatomy or will I be wasting my time?
Don't do it. Enjoy your last year off. Medical school is for studying anatomy.....kdwuma said:I have been accepted to med school for 2006, is it beneficial if i started looking at some netter's anatomy stuff, since everyone seems to complain about gross anatomy or will I be wasting my time?
kdwuma said:I have been accepted to med school for 2006, is it beneficial if i started looking at some netter's anatomy stuff, since everyone seems to complain about gross anatomy or will I be wasting my time?
rpkall said:I meant to say this earlier: you should read fun books about being a Doctor. Like House of God, or "Letters to a Young Doctor," by Richard Selzer; or "Kitchen Table Wisdom," by Rachel Remin, or whatever else floats your boat. Try to get a little experience with the language of healing and health-care. That's more important before med school than anatomy. Learning to put the science into a human context will be of much more value to you, I think.
Good luck.
kdwuma said:I have been accepted to med school for 2006, is it beneficial if i started looking at some netter's anatomy stuff, since everyone seems to complain about gross anatomy or will I be wasting my time?
kdwuma said:I have been accepted to med school for 2006, is it beneficial if i started looking at some netter's anatomy stuff, since everyone seems to complain about gross anatomy or will I be wasting my time?
kdwuma said:I have been accepted to med school for 2006, is it beneficial if i started looking at some netter's anatomy stuff, since everyone seems to complain about gross anatomy or will I be wasting my time?
OSUdoc08 said:Waste of your time. If won't alter the grade even on your first exam.
Read House of God, By Shem
Gerry_Doc2b said:Just putting my 2 cents. Pre studying makes sense if you have been out of school or have not recently done any science courses. whether you are a non science major or your past performance on sciences.
All of these characteristics may indicate a potential benefit for review. For me, pre-studying before classes helped me to structure a study shedule with working out, eating and all of those essential things.
Choose a topic that might be difficult for you. If you can get in touch with a student at your preferred school, he/she may give you an idea about the most difficult courses, whether teaching is mostly based on research, whether a particular book is helpful.
I would say go for it but still try to have fun...You will have less and less time for yourself as you progress through med school.
hope this helps.
ingamina said:Hi Guys!
I've been accepted for 2006 too, and I'm going to disagree. Partly because I couldn't "relax" if I wanted to, I'm so excited. Although I'm not reading anything technical, or studying, I've been deluging myself with information about the trade, reading about what to expect, histories of medicine, and a fabulous compilation of essays called "Compassion's Way". I feel there is so much to learn and know just about what it means to be a med student, I would be doing a disservice to go in blind.
kdwuma said:I have been accepted to med school for 2006, is it beneficial if i started looking at some netter's anatomy stuff, since everyone seems to complain about gross anatomy or will I be wasting my time?
Law2Doc said:Find somebody attractive and play doctor for the next few months. Any other kind of review before school will be a waste of time. Besides, your professors are going to focus in on and emphasize what they think is important, so no point trying to learn every minute detail of anatomy when only a subset is going to actually be on your tests.
deuist said:Moore makes too many mistakes. Take a look as his discussion of peritoneal arteries. He mislabels diagrams and does a royal job getting the position of vessels wrong. I was so confused that I had to check other sources just to make sense of it all.
deuist said:Moore makes too many mistakes. Take a look as his discussion of peritoneal arteries. He mislabels diagrams and does a royal job getting the position of vessels wrong. I was so confused that I had to check other sources just to make sense of it all.
deuist said:Moore makes too many mistakes. Take a look as his discussion of peritoneal arteries. He mislabels diagrams and does a royal job getting the position of vessels wrong. I was so confused that I had to check other sources just to make sense of it all.
DoctorFunk said:Anyone actually reading Moore's description of the anatomical structures has too much time on their hands. Class notes should suffice for simple descriptions of relationships. Where Moore's really shines is in anatomy-related clinical conditions, which were very high-yield in the lecture half of my anatomy course. I found Moore's (or Chung's BRS Anatomy) to be very helpful in that regard.
Law2Doc said:All of these books are better resources to use after you have gone through class notes. I wouldn't recommend someone trying to teach themselves anatomy from Moores from scratch over the summer. Just a waste of time.
DoctorFunk said:Anyone actually reading Moore's description of the anatomical structures has too much time on their hands. Class notes should suffice for simple descriptions of relationships. Where Moore's really shines is in anatomy-related clinical conditions, which were very high-yield in the lecture half of my anatomy course. I found Moore's (or Chung's BRS Anatomy) to be very helpful in that regard.
deuist said:About the clinical correlations: are you talking about big Moore? Clinically Oriented Anatomy had very few of the blue boxes.