Status of GMO spots in navy

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

medstudent09

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2024
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I’ve been reading that the navy is trying to phase out PGY1 —> GMO route and instead only put residency-trained docs in these billets. Anyone have any intel on if/when this transition will take full effect? If planning to enter PGY1 in 2026, will PGY1 —> GMO —> out to civilian residency be an option for HPSP payback?

Members don't see this ad.
 
If planning to enter PGY1 in 2026, will PGY1 —> GMO —> out to civilian residency be an option for HPSP payback?

Yes, it will still be an option.

And that's unfortunate, b/c getting physician payback as a GMO is completely a waste of money for the Navy.

But still, it'll be an option. The # of GMO spots is not going down to Zero.
 
Yes, it will still be an option.

And that's unfortunate, b/c getting physician payback as a GMO is completely a waste of money for the Navy.

But still, it'll be an option. The # of GMO spots is not going down to Zero.
It’s still a billet getting filled by a GMO instead of using a board certified doc.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I have been speaking with the Commander who deals with internships (Robyn Treadwell, you can google her exact title), and she is saying that an HPSP grad can almost always choose their own specialty (like if it’s very competitive, maybe you won’t get that first choice). If you don’t get in first try, you do a year on a team (it sounded like she was describing GMO, but bc I’m super unfamiliar with this stuff, I’m not sure). Her words were something like “without being board certified, you can’t practice” saying that an untrained doctor is essentially useless in the Navy.
Tonight I talked with a Navy surgeon who did HPSH ten yrs ago. He said 100% you do not choose your specialty. He said before residency, everyone must do a GMO for 2-3 yrs. He said don’t bother asking my recruiter bc they know nothing.

So I’m looking for any advice or feedback on what I should actually expect. I’m not a DO candidate. I am a competitive MD applicant with a high gpa and my MPH will be complete next year. I’m only interested in psychiatry. I’m totally fine with the Navy owning me for at least 4 years, but I am attached to choosing my specialty. I’m also not sure I like the idea of a GMO, as a nontrad student, I don’t want to start residency in my 40s.
 
I have been speaking with the Commander who deals with internships (Robyn Treadwell, you can google her exact title),

Why don't you just tell us what her title and position is? 🙂

and she is saying that an HPSP grad can almost always choose their own specialty (like if it’s very competitive, maybe you won’t get that first choice). If you don’t get in first try, you do a year on a team (it sounded like she was describing GMO, but bc I’m super unfamiliar with this stuff, I’m not sure).

It's always been true that in the end, the great majority of HPSP/USUHS grads do match into their first choice specialty. Sometimes with an intervening GMO tour.

The same is true of the civilian match (minus GMO time, obviously).

However, while these statements are factually true, they lack a bit of context. The elephant in the room is self-selection and how these applicants decide what their "first choice" actually is. Medical students are smart people who can do math, and they generally don't apply to specialties they know they can't match to.

Some of this calculus relates to their grades and board scores, and some of this calculus relates to the system they're applying within. For the HPSP'ers, there are considerations like historical stats, the (relatively few) number of spots, whether a specialty even exists in the military GME system, and whether or not the military health system projects a need to train a particular specialist in any given year.

In the military, some of those things are clear to anyone who looks and some are more opaque.

If you want to be a general surgeon or psychiatrist or anesthesiologist, you can count on the Navy having a number of residency positions for those every year. If you want to be a pediatric endocrinologist or do an adult cardiothoracic fellowship after your anesthesiology residency ... well, the Navy doesn't really need a lot of those, and sometimes years will go by when there are ZERO people who are selected for training.

So, did a would-be cardiac anesthesiologist who had to wait 7 years for an ACTA fellowship slot to be approved by the GME selection board get his "first choice" ... technically yes. If he didn't apply for the years when the GMESB offered zero slots, does that mean he didn't want to?

Self selection is the caveat behind every rosy "almost everyone gets what they want" proclamation.

Her words were something like “without being board certified, you can’t practice” saying that an untrained doctor is essentially useless in the Navy.

This is a bizarre statement given the continued extensive use of GMOs, who are by definition not board certified (or board eligible), and arguably untrained.

Tonight I talked with a Navy surgeon who did HPSH ten yrs ago. He said 100% you do not choose your specialty. He said before residency, everyone must do a GMO for 2-3 yrs. He said don’t bother asking my recruiter bc they know nothing.

Recruiters don't know anything, true. They aren't doctors. They're not usually acting in bad faith or lying, but they believe the brochure they've been given. They are uninformed, and they work in a high pressure number-driven arena that rewards them for signups. Buyer beware.

Not everyone does GMO tours. Straight-through training is a thing, has always been a thing, and has become a more common thing in the last 10-20 years. How common now? Depends very much on specialty. Some specialties send most or all of their interns straight on to PGY-2 and residency, some specialties send few of them straight through.

So I’m looking for any advice or feedback on what I should actually expect. I’m not a DO candidate. I am a competitive MD applicant with a high gpa and my MPH will be complete next year. I’m only interested in psychiatry. I’m totally fine with the Navy owning me for at least 4 years, but I am attached to choosing my specialty. I’m also not sure I like the idea of a GMO, as a nontrad student, I don’t want to start residency in my 40s.

The good news is that the military will not force you into a specialty you don't want. Worst case, you do an intern year, serve out your 4 year obligation as a GMO, then go to the civilian match and start residency in the field you want (assuming you match of course). Part of that worst case is that it's possible you'll end up in a prelim intern program that isn't a good fit for the residency you want to do. If you want to do psychiatry, there's a nonzero chance they'll send you to do a surgery internship. If you want to be a surgeon, there's a nonzero chance they'll send you to do an internal medicine internship. These outcomes are unlikely given that you're a competitive applicant with a high gpa and I wouldn't lose any sleep over them.

More likely in this era, is that you'll apply to the specialty you want (psychiatry), match, train straight through, and then do a 4 years as a psychiatrist in the Navy before deciding to get out, or stay in for a longer period.

I don't know how competitive psychiatry is at the Navy programs these days, but my feeling is that your odds are quite good.


Disclaimer - I retired from the Navy in 2022 and every day that goes by my information gets a little more out of date.
 
Why don't you just tell us what her title and position is? 🙂



It's always been true that in the end, the great majority of HPSP/USUHS grads do match into their first choice specialty. Sometimes with an intervening GMO tour.

The same is true of the civilian match (minus GMO time, obviously).

However, while these statements are factually true, they lack a bit of context. The elephant in the room is self-selection and how these applicants decide what their "first choice" actually is. Medical students are smart people who can do math, and they generally don't apply to specialties they know they can't match to.

Some of this calculus relates to their grades and board scores, and some of this calculus relates to the system they're applying within. For the HPSP'ers, there are considerations like historical stats, the (relatively few) number of spots, whether a specialty even exists in the military GME system, and whether or not the military health system projects a need to train a particular specialist in any given year.

In the military, some of those things are clear to anyone who looks and some are more opaque.

If you want to be a general surgeon or psychiatrist or anesthesiologist, you can count on the Navy having a number of residency positions for those every year. If you want to be a pediatric endocrinologist or do an adult cardiothoracic fellowship after your anesthesiology residency ... well, the Navy doesn't really need a lot of those, and sometimes years will go by when there are ZERO people who are selected for training.

So, did a would-be cardiac anesthesiologist who had to wait 7 years for an ACTA fellowship slot to be approved by the GME selection board get his "first choice" ... technically yes. If he didn't apply for the years when the GMESB offered zero slots, does that mean he didn't want to?

Self selection is the caveat behind every rosy "almost everyone gets what they want" proclamation.



This is a bizarre statement given the continued extensive use of GMOs, who are by definition not board certified (or board eligible), and arguably untrained.



Recruiters don't know anything, true. They aren't doctors. They're not usually acting in bad faith or lying, but they believe the brochure they've been given. They are uninformed, and they work in a high pressure number-driven arena that rewards them for signups. Buyer beware.

Not everyone does GMO tours. Straight-through training is a thing, has always been a thing, and has become a more common thing in the last 10-20 years. How common now? Depends very much on specialty. Some specialties send most or all of their interns straight on to PGY-2 and residency, some specialties send few of them straight through.



The good news is that the military will not force you into a specialty you don't want. Worst case, you do an intern year, serve out your 4 year obligation as a GMO, then go to the civilian match and start residency in the field you want (assuming you match of course). Part of that worst case is that it's possible you'll end up in a prelim intern program that isn't a good fit for the residency you want to do. If you want to do psychiatry, there's a nonzero chance they'll send you to do a surgery internship. If you want to be a surgeon, there's a nonzero chance they'll send you to do an internal medicine internship. These outcomes are unlikely given that you're a competitive applicant with a high gpa and I wouldn't lose any sleep over them.

More likely in this era, is that you'll apply to the specialty you want (psychiatry), match, train straight through, and then do a 4 years as a psychiatrist in the Navy before deciding to get out, or stay in for a longer period.

I don't know how competitive psychiatry is at the Navy programs these days, but my feeling is that your odds are quite good.


Disclaimer - I retired from the Navy in 2022 and every day that goes by my information gets a little more out of date.

Commander Treadwell:

Originally from Austin, Texas, Commander Robyn Treadwell received her Bachelor of Arts degree in Biology, Spanish, and Latin American Studies from Brandeis University. She graduated from the University of Texas Health Science Center- San Antonio School of Medicine and completed her Psychiatry internship at Boston University.

CDR Treadwell concluded training in the Psychiatry Residency and Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Fellowship at the University of Massachusetts in Worcester. While a resident, she joined the Navy as an inactive reservist. Upon completing her training, she reported to her first duty station at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth (NMCP) as a staff member. She currently serves as an Assistant Professor of Psychiatry at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS). She deployed to Camp Leatherneck, Afghanistan, in support of Operation Enduring Freedom with the Concussion Restoration Care team as part of Combat Logistics Regiment II in 2013. Upon her return to NMCP, she led as the division officer of Child Mental Health.

She has steered quality improvements as Clinical Champion for Health Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) for the Directorate of Mental Health, TeamSTEPPS Master Trainer, and trained as a Lean Six Sigma Green Belt enhancing collaboration and efficiency in the Exceptional Family Member Program at U.S. Naval Hospital Yokosuka Japan. While in Japan, she served in diverse roles, including Fleet Mental Health provider for the USS John S. McCain, responding to their tragic 2017 collision in Singapore, and Director of Healthcare Business.

Returning to Virginia, CDR Treadwell established herself as a dynamic faculty member. She led the military's only inpatient adolescent psychiatry unit and highlighted education and training as the Deputy Director for Education, Training, and Research. She joined the Mental Health Directorate at the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery in the summer of 2021 as the Deputy Director for Mental Health, then transitioned to the Office of the Medical Corps Chief as the Plans and Policy Officer in February 2023. A strong proponent of graduate medical education, CDR Treadwell is the Navy Intern Specialty Leader.

Military decorations include the Defense Meritorious Service Medal, the Meritorious Service Medal, the Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal, and the Fleet Marine Force Warfare Officer designation.

She is board certified in General Psychiatry and Child and Adolescent Psychiatry by the American Board of Psychiatrists and Neurologists.

*Non-financial relationships: No non-financial relationships have been disclosed.

————————
I didn’t give her title because I don’t quite understand military titles and don’t want to sound like an idiot. But there’s her bio.
————————
Thanks for the very thorough answer. It basically sounds a bit like it has a decent chance of going any direction. But getting high scores on STEP exams and desiring a speciality that is useful to the Navy helps a person go the direction they want to.
————————
Does having a masters degree impact anything?
 
Does having a masters degree impact anything?
In the past, the point system for ranking applicants at the GME selection board did give points for advanced degrees (PhD for sure, I think also Masters).

I'm a long way from having any first hand knowledge of that process, so I don't know how significant an effect it has now.
 
In the past, the point system for ranking applicants at the GME selection board did give points for advanced degrees (PhD for sure, I think also Masters).

I'm a long way from having any first hand knowledge of that process, so I don't know how significant an effect it has now.
I appreciate your input though. Even if it’s not 100%, it still helps me get a better idea of stuff.
 
Why don't you just tell us what her title and position is? 🙂



It's always been true that in the end, the great majority of HPSP/USUHS grads do match into their first choice specialty. Sometimes with an intervening GMO tour.

The same is true of the civilian match (minus GMO time, obviously).

However, while these statements are factually true, they lack a bit of context. The elephant in the room is self-selection and how these applicants decide what their "first choice" actually is. Medical students are smart people who can do math, and they generally don't apply to specialties they know they can't match to.

Some of this calculus relates to their grades and board scores, and some of this calculus relates to the system they're applying within. For the HPSP'ers, there are considerations like historical stats, the (relatively few) number of spots, whether a specialty even exists in the military GME system, and whether or not the military health system projects a need to train a particular specialist in any given year.

In the military, some of those things are clear to anyone who looks and some are more opaque.

If you want to be a general surgeon or psychiatrist or anesthesiologist, you can count on the Navy having a number of residency positions for those every year. If you want to be a pediatric endocrinologist or do an adult cardiothoracic fellowship after your anesthesiology residency ... well, the Navy doesn't really need a lot of those, and sometimes years will go by when there are ZERO people who are selected for training.

So, did a would-be cardiac anesthesiologist who had to wait 7 years for an ACTA fellowship slot to be approved by the GME selection board get his "first choice" ... technically yes. If he didn't apply for the years when the GMESB offered zero slots, does that mean he didn't want to?

Self selection is the caveat behind every rosy "almost everyone gets what they want" proclamation.



This is a bizarre statement given the continued extensive use of GMOs, who are by definition not board certified (or board eligible), and arguably untrained.



Recruiters don't know anything, true. They aren't doctors. They're not usually acting in bad faith or lying, but they believe the brochure they've been given. They are uninformed, and they work in a high pressure number-driven arena that rewards them for signups. Buyer beware.

Not everyone does GMO tours. Straight-through training is a thing, has always been a thing, and has become a more common thing in the last 10-20 years. How common now? Depends very much on specialty. Some specialties send most or all of their interns straight on to PGY-2 and residency, some specialties send few of them straight through.



The good news is that the military will not force you into a specialty you don't want. Worst case, you do an intern year, serve out your 4 year obligation as a GMO, then go to the civilian match and start residency in the field you want (assuming you match of course). Part of that worst case is that it's possible you'll end up in a prelim intern program that isn't a good fit for the residency you want to do. If you want to do psychiatry, there's a nonzero chance they'll send you to do a surgery internship. If you want to be a surgeon, there's a nonzero chance they'll send you to do an internal medicine internship. These outcomes are unlikely given that you're a competitive applicant with a high gpa and I wouldn't lose any sleep over them.

More likely in this era, is that you'll apply to the specialty you want (psychiatry), match, train straight through, and then do a 4 years as a psychiatrist in the Navy before deciding to get out, or stay in for a longer period.

I don't know how competitive psychiatry is at the Navy programs these days, but my feeling is that your odds are quite good.


Disclaimer - I retired from the Navy in 2022 and every day that goes by my information gets a little more out of date.
You have to be licensed to be a GMO, not board certified. You have to pass all 3 Steps and be licensed in a state. You aren't going to be board eligible/board certified until you complete a residency and board exam.
 
You have to be licensed to be a GMO, not board certified. You have to pass all 3 Steps and be licensed in a state. You aren't going to be board eligible/board certified until you complete a residency and board exam.
Yes, I'm aware of that.

I was replying to the quote
Her words were something like “without being board certified, you can’t practice” saying that an untrained doctor is essentially useless in the Navy.

which is of course nonsense, because GMOs aren't board certified/eligible, but are nonetheless so useful to the Navy that they can't quit using them.
 
Yes, I'm aware of that.

I was replying to the quote


which is of course nonsense, because GMOs aren't board certified/eligible, but are nonetheless so useful to the Navy that they can't quit using them.
Precisely. She was saying that without residency training and being certified in a speciality, someone would not be as useful.
 
Yes, I'm aware of that.

I was replying to the quote


which is of course nonsense, because GMOs aren't board certified/eligible, but are nonetheless so useful to the Navy that they can't quit using them.
Quoted you instead of Sovjak. My bad.
 
Precisely. She was saying that without residency training and being certified in a speciality, someone would not be as useful.
I mean there's truth to that. But technically you can function from a bureaucratic POV.
 
CDR Treadwell is the current Navy Intern Specialty Leader. She’s been in that role for a a few years now and with her background at BUMED before that has a good handle on the current status/plan for GMOs in the Navy. She’s not one to sell a load of BS.
 
Precisely. She was saying that without residency training and being certified in a speciality, someone would not be as useful.
Sure - and I'm sorry to belabor this point - but the current, ongoing state of affairs in military medicine is that GMOs, who are without residency training and are not certified in a specialty, are clearly useful enough to the military (especially the Navy) that they continue to exist in large numbers. That this phenomenon is a disservice to the GMOs and the cared-for servicemembers alike is less important to leaders than cost savings and avoidance of appropriate force restructuring.

There has been an impressive display of mental gymnastics put forth by medical corps leaders in the last 25 years to simultaneously excuse/justify the existence of GMOs while also attempting to reduce their numbers.
 
CDR Treadwell is the current Navy Intern Specialty Leader. She’s been in that role for a a few years now and with her background at BUMED before that has a good handle on the current status/plan for GMOs in the Navy. She’s not one to sell a load of BS.
I’m glad to hear that! She is the only Navy psychiatrist I’ve been able to talk to, which I am very appreciative of.
 
I could be wrong but I thought Step 1,2 and 3 are the boards required to legally practice medicine (from law POV) but nobody stops there because in 2024 you basically have to do a residency in the civilian world to get a job and obviously it is better for patients. But in military as long as you can practice legally they don't care as much about the extra expertise since most cases they just need a "good enough" PCP to do the day to day boring clinical duties on mostly pretty healthy young folks. I mean the NBME literally has BOARD in the acronym, but I'm probably just arguing semantics.
 
Precisely. She was saying that without residency training and being certified in a speciality, someone would not be as useful.
And is obliquely asking "what else are we going to be able to do with you" while ignoring the obvious answer that they should direct you to apply for civilian residencies (if they haven't got one of their own to offer you), get trained and report once board-eligible. Simple, really, unless you work for an organization that doesn't get it because they simply don't want to acknowledge the obvious and necessary.
 
Top