- Joined
- Oct 26, 2007
- Messages
- 635
- Reaction score
- 1
Whoa, hold the boat! You mean to tell me that Sullivan University is a FOR PROFIT university!!!!!
Whoa, hold the boat! You mean to tell me that Sullivan University is a FOR PROFIT university!!!!!
There should be an appropriate label for the dozens of new, unneeded, private label schools that want to make a quick buck that are popping up everywhere. Bandwagon schools, maybe? I just hope it all stops soon. A PharmD will be like a psychology BS in 20 years at the rate schools are opening.
I feel the same way. California Northstate is coming out of nowhere to open the 8th pharmacy school in California, which i don't think is needed at all.
However, Kentucky has only one pharmacy school. The state has the second biggest shortage of pharmacists after Alabama. I think the state does need one more school.
Just curious- where did you get this information? Got a link or a website?
I feel the same way. California Northstate is coming out of nowhere to open the 8th pharmacy school in California, which i don't think is needed at all.
However, Kentucky has only one pharmacy school. The state has the second biggest shortage of pharmacists after Alabama. I think the state does need one more school.
nah, Mississippi has the biggest shortage.
it seems Sullivan University gets a lot of talk for a school that hasn't even admitted its first class yet (even though it has accepted some of that class). Sullivan must at least be enjoying all this attention for its program
That's an interesting change in position from defending a for profit school in the osteopathic forums.
okay, for the record, I agree with you guys. I have nothing against FOR PROFIT, in fact I think it can be more beneficial in some aspects.
My point was that there is this HUGE OUTRAGE over RVU, the new for profit med school in the other forums. Again, I don;t see what all the fuss is about. They're over there using SDN to push petitions, etc.
Anyhow, it appears that pharmacy is more advanced and progressive, which is a refreshing change....
I do have some issues with an institution having the status of FOR PROFIT. First, it doesn't appear that the focus will be on the education quality, rather the money they're bringing in to the stakeholders. They want to make sure their earnings are growing. Second, a for profit institution like University of Phoenix seems to only admit students so they can get their money. At one time, I heard that it was only a diploma mill, that all you had to do was pay for the classes and you pass. I've learned that this is incorrect, you do have to do the work assigned to make the grade. BUT... at one time I thought of getting an MBA from UoP. I had to fill out the information request form, and I didn't think they would EVER stop calling me. They didn't seem to care what credentials I had - they kept pressuring me to enroll for classes - IMMEDIATELY. I do take issue with a for profit place like this... Although, I'm sure Sullivan will not admit students to look good on their GL.
All that said, it's a fact that a business has to make a profit to stay in business -- even the not-for-profit businesses. If they're not profitable, they are unable to invest in new initiatives. If unable to invest in initiatives, they ultimately fail. It's a fine line to walk on for the not-for-profits/non-profits too.
I agree with you brother, but the $750,000 salary for the Dean at a California medical school (La Jolla?)...that salary isn't exactly buying desks and chalkboards....
That salary is high because you need to be competitive in attracting competent and talented individuals to the job, as these people will easily get taken away by other institutions or the private sector offering higher salaries/better benefits.
And you need talented Deans and Chancellors to attract top level faculty which will make or break your student population's academic careers.
University of California is having that problem right now retaining faculty as funding levels have dropped. If you don't have good faculty, you might as well throw your institution's reputation out the window.
So you're essentially saying that the $750,000 salary is to be considered an investment to enchance the program? Okay, I agree with you there.