- Joined
- Feb 17, 2012
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 7
You are completely insane, malicious and a disgrace to the medical profession.
“Of course, of course.” Lying to the State medical board about not causing an unnecessary neck dissection, while under oath during an April 2014 deposition is surely “not” perjury.
Also, it’s definitely “good” to buy a book, have another resident ask me if I bought it and then register the book using my name and email address. Surely it’s also “honorable” to write that a resident broke their desk when the desk was just fine. Would you like photos of the desk that I allegedly broke?
Would you like photos of the saw that I allegedly broke? The Stryker bone cutting saw was not broken, but after being used for months, the replaceable blade of the saw broke while cutting bone. It’s probably “not” malicious to write that I broke the saw, because the disposable blade, and the saw are quite similar.
Writing that I broke a saw in my educational file without discussing it with me is probably an effort to help me accomplish the remediation.
It’s probably also “good” to spread rumors around the residency program, including to other attendings that a resident broke into the program directors home. That probably “won’t” generate any prejudicial assessments.
It’s probably also “equitable” to write a letter to a resident’s file that berates them for answering accurately on a College of American Patholgists proficiency survey. Eric F. Glassy, MD, has written that the answer given is the correct term for the AML M3 cell with many auer rods.
Writing that a resident is somewhat impaired while grossing, adding it to their file, and saying nothing to the resident about it is “ethical.”
Last edited: