The consultologists

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

scoopdaboop

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Messages
794
Reaction score
894
Hospitalists who consult for every tiny little problem (some of my attendings). You are an embarrassment. As a pgy3 I manage patients better than some of my attendings, how do I know? Because when I work with another attending who is actually a judicious physician good things happen.
Sad what this field has become.
 
Hospitalists who consult for every tiny little problem (some of my attendings). You are an embarrassment. As a pgy3 I manage patients better than some of my attendings, how do I know? Because when I work with another attending who is actually a judicious physician good things happen.
Sad what this field has become.
There's definitely another side to that coin. In some systems, hospitalists are pushed to manage a wider range of issues on their own, often taking on "specialty" care that might otherwise be handled by a consultant. Most of the time, this approach works out just fine.

However, there's a risk to that kind of independence. When you choose not to consult, you're going out on a limb. It's not necessarily because you don't know what to do; often, you have a solid plan. The problem comes when a patient's condition takes a bad turn. In that situation, you can be asked why you didn't consult, even if the consultant would have made the exact same recommendation you did. You may not have the formal training to make that final, binding call.

So, while it can be frustrating to see what you perceive as over-consulting, there's also a real danger in playing the consultant yourself. It's a thorny issue, and while things usually go well, when they don't, it can go very wrong.
 
Hospitalists who consult for every tiny little problem (some of my attendings). You are an embarrassment. As a pgy3 I manage patients better than some of my attendings, how do I know? Because when I work with another attending who is actually a judicious physician good things happen.
Sad what this field has become.

And in some hospitals, you're almost required to consult.

I get hate inquiries when I don't consult the Diabetic NP , as if I can't titrate insulin myself.

What's even worse, is some consults are placed automatically (tele-neuro, sepsis NP, etc) as per nurse-driven protocols.

@scoopdaboop Stay Gold Ponyboy . . . the real world awaits.
 
Hospitalists who consult for every tiny little problem (some of my attendings). You are an embarrassment. As a pgy3 I manage patients better than some of my attendings, how do I know? Because when I work with another attending who is actually a judicious physician good things happen.
Sad what this field has become.
1756344913682.png
 
And in some hospitals, you're almost required to consult.

I get hate inquiries when I don't consult the Diabetic NP , as if I can't titrate insulin myself.

What's even worse, is some consults are placed automatically (tele-neuro, sepsis NP, etc) as per nurse-driven protocols.

@scoopdaboop Stay Gold Ponyboy . . . the real world awaits.

Exactly.

Some hospitals have built their entire ecosystem out of hospitalists slinging BS consults, ie calling nephrology for every creatinine over 1.2, etc.
 
Exactly.

Some hospitals have built their entire ecosystem out of hospitalists slinging BS consults, ie calling nephrology for every creatinine over 1.2, etc.
I don’t think I could work in that environment. How do y’all do it.

I’m inpatient only and have total control over consulting and take very seriously the idea that to consult a specialty outside of my own (mal heme) I should have questions, (ie need help with work up or diff dx) or need procedure (ie egd bronch etc). I work closely with transplant ID which is closest thing I have to policy that we need to consult a specific service ( abx stewardship which I wholeheartedly support). Is this just academic vs community?

I do my best to get a full handle of a given clinical scenario (barring urgency ie micu consult 🙄 ) before consulting to avoid the appearance of asking another service to do my work for me. Additionally it helps to have a good back and forth once the consult is called and recs start coming through. Many of the consulting teams don’t know the first thing about the toxicities or complications of the diseases I treat or the drugs I use. Which is crazy but not expected

Edit; for reference my census is 20-25. And this is not meant to suggest this is the only way to do it, just that I understand OPs concerns and there are multiple sides to this issue
 
Last edited:
Exactly.

Some hospitals have built their entire ecosystem out of hospitalists slinging BS consults, ie calling nephrology for every creatinine over 1.2, etc.
Let's not forget that some hospitals work their hospitalists way too hard. If you have 20+ patients on your service, you're likely to consult more just for lack of time to do a proper job.
 
Let's not forget that some hospitals work their hospitalists way too hard. If you have 20+ patients on your service, you're likely to consult more just for lack of time to do a proper job.

Yes, I’ve definitely heard of that happening too. When I was a resident, I had an attending who used to work at a busy community hospital that was like this. Each hospitalist was covering way too many patients, and he said he didn’t have time to think through anything. Just consult for every issue.
 
It gets even shadier. My border-town hospital has an emergency fund that pays for the un-insured and indigenous population.

Everyone asks to be consulted, so they can dip into this emergency fund, which often reimburses better than some private insurances.

Not quite sure how we live with ourselves . . . but it sure gets easier with time.
 
It gets even shadier. My border-town hospital has an emergency fund that pays for the un-insured and indigenous population.

Everyone asks to be consulted, so they can dip into this emergency fund, which often reimburses better than some private insurances.

Not quite sure how we live with ourselves . . . but it sure gets easier with time.
Yikes! Shady is right
 
It gets even shadier. My border-town hospital has an emergency fund that pays for the un-insured and indigenous population.

Everyone asks to be consulted, so they can dip into this emergency fund, which often reimburses better than some private insurances.

Not quite sure how we live with ourselves . . . but it sure gets easier with time.
where I previously worked, we were on collection model, so hospital got paid from the fund but the consulting physicians didnt. So you saw the patient, gave recommendations, took liability, did all the work and didnt get paid. So when questioned, they said others do it as well and its part of the culture. Mind you, there were at least 60 plus patients I saw within a 9 month period that were uninsured.
 
What's even worse, is some consults are placed automatically (tele-neuro, sepsis NP, etc) as per nurse-driven protocols.
that's fine. and some consults are forced. GI needs to be involved in a bleeder obviously. But these are not what I am speaking of. What I really mean is silly things, CAP necessitating a pulm consult, obvious prerenal aki necessitating nephro.

and let's be honest. Half a hospitalist's list are rocks pending dc. let's not pretend 10 patients is hard to manage out of 20 you skim review, or don't even have daily labs on etc.
 
and let's be honest. Half a hospitalist's list are rocks pending dc. let's not pretend 10 patients is hard to manage out of 20 you skim review, or don't even have daily labs on etc.

True. Make's the general hospitalist role look like a scam.

In due time---with the advent of AI to write your note, nurses to do your physical exams for you (as if the physical exam matters anymore)---the hospitalist will soon have to cover 50 patients by herself. The typical hospitalist group of 20 will dwindle down to 5.

And the Sun will become a Red Giant one day engulfing the Earth . . . so why does it matter anyway? I'm going drinking.
 
Hospitalists who consult for every tiny little problem (some of my attendings). You are an embarrassment. As a pgy3 I manage patients better than some of my attendings, how do I know? Because when I work with another attending who is actually a judicious physician good things happen.
Sad what this field has become.
As a resident, you have ACGME caps on the number of patients you manage. Hospitalists do not. They manage 20-24 patients themselves per day. They might probably not consult as much if they managed fewer patients.
 
It gets even shadier. My border-town hospital has an emergency fund that pays for the un-insured and indigenous population.

Everyone asks to be consulted, so they can dip into this emergency fund, which often reimburses better than some private insurances.

Not quite sure how we live with ourselves . . . but it sure gets easier with time.
Government "emergency fund" paying better than private insurers (and thus dramatically more the Medicare/Medicaid for its own citizens) is peak government
 
Last edited:
and let's be honest. Half a hospitalist's list are rocks pending dc. let's not pretend 10 patients is hard to manage out of 20 you skim review, or don't even have daily labs on etc.

Very dependent on location and practice. A profitable hospital doesn't have a huge population of rocks. In my group we generally carry 18 to 20 patients (with a PA to help) and usually only one or two are rocks. There are generally three to four fresh admits and three to four discharges each day, and the remaining patients have multiple active medical issues, even if not extremely sick. I wish I had 10 rocks on service every day - reminds me of being a senior resident at the VA.
 
In residency was firmly against consulting unnecessarily, as a point of pride. Carried that ethos to attending on the inpatient transplant service (in the community) and eventually the ID docs mildly complained that they were not seeing enough consults. So now, gram negative bacteremia, doing great on cefepime? Consult ID, no skin off my back
 
I thought this way as a resident too but you will see that in the real world of medicine there are many political pressures at play. Providing care for our patients is a minority of what we do nowadays.
 
Top