- Joined
- Oct 9, 2008
- Messages
- 439
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Medical Student
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Alright. So. Let's educate ourselves a bit with an eclectic mix of relevant authors and the restart this thread later.
For those who are atheist or agnostic (and it seems like the former is more popular here): reading some C.S. Lewis, Soren Kierkegaard, Thomas Merton, may be enlightening.
Those religiously minded: David Hume, Albert Camus, and if you must (and that's a big 'if') Richard Dawkins.
At the root of what I'm proposing is that we take time to actually understand the debate. We should read those who can speak eloquently, rationally, and fruitfully about the existence or nonexistence of God.
Give some of the academicians some credit and assume that this debate as a whole has merit. Dismissing one side or another a priori just makes you look silly.
For those who are atheist or agnostic (and it seems like the former is more popular here): reading some C.S. Lewis, Soren Kierkegaard, Thomas Merton, may be enlightening.
Those religiously minded: David Hume, Albert Camus, and if you must (and that's a big 'if') Richard Dawkins.
At the root of what I'm proposing is that we take time to actually understand the debate. We should read those who can speak eloquently, rationally, and fruitfully about the existence or nonexistence of God.
Give some of the academicians some credit and assume that this debate as a whole has merit. Dismissing one side or another a priori just makes you look silly.


we should just all just calm down. we know we're all likely gonna be great doctors, religious or not. and we're all much more agreeable when there's no anonymity and a large audience. debating is fun. but making friends beats it hands-down.