Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Feel free to discharge all the tachycardic patients you want. The lawyers love that. Perhaps they’ll serve you with papers written in crayon. At least that might make you laugh a little, which is sometimes all that you can do as a response in the ED when a tragedy like this happens and perhaps no one is at fault. There aren’t enough details to adequately MMQB this case and even that wouldn’t do it justice when we all know that the system including admitted boarding patients, low nursing staffing levels, and an overwhelming volume of worried well also might have affected this case. I applaud the father for seeking a path in health policy instead of placing his entire focus on litigation. At least it’s a search for a solution in a mess of a system. This site could use a little more of that and a little less toxic negativity. Perhaps, more crayons.
In my experience and practice, I generally do not discharge adults with a consistent HR above 110 without a very clear explanation. Yes the number is mostly arbitrary but if you’re discharging people with last documented HR above that you’re just asking for trouble. We’re paid in part based on our judgement and if I have someone with truly persistently abnormal vitals, I generally start digging and wouldn’t think twice about placing them in observation. It’s actually rare that I have a patient like this who would otherwise be discharged (nothing else concerning or abnormal found during the evaluation). I consider it one of the cardinal sins of EM to discharge grossly abnormal vital signs.