- Joined
- Aug 8, 2006
- Messages
- 5,187
- Reaction score
- 403
- Points
- 5,191
- Location
- State of Delirium
- Website
- www.lmgtfy.com
- Attending Physician
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I think that the problem is in the void of having no overarching group which ranks DO schools specifically amongst each other, you have each schools spreading their admissions propaganda. That is the extent to which 90 percent of us have had exposure to these medical schools. Everyone has been told by people who control their fate that X school is the best. They pay thousands of dollars to secure their spot and at least rest assured that their school's the best in some shape or form.
You wouldn't see this with MD schools. An Albany Medical College student is never going to think that they are superior to someone at Johns Hopkins...
That's bc the ranking system has been ingrained in that community. This is not the case in the osteopathic medical community.
USNews adds DO schools in for spice, but does a piss-poor job of actually comparing them amongst each other. WVSOM ranks 49th in primary care... what does that f-ing mean!? It means they graduate more primary care docs and that they give you early clinical experience.
PCOM isn't ranked by USNews.. does that mean that WVSOM is better? I don't think that's the case at all.
Although a case can be made that the current lack of ranking is positive bc it discourages competition, I think that it does a disservice to premed students wanting to gain a thorough comparative analysis.
Some things that we need a comparative analysis of:
1) Professor Quality
2) COMLEX/USMLE pass rate (yes, BOTH bc a huge percentage of DOs go into allo residencies..)
3) Curriculum
4) Clinical Rotation sites
5) Matchlist
5) % Graduates entering primary care
6) % Graduates specializing
7) Admissions data (MCAT, GPA)
8) Student life
9) Facilities
10) [insert something i missed here]
These things need to be QUANTIFIED in some manner so that an OBJECTIVE measure is possible. Until this happens, there is absolutely no way to give a resolute ranking system.
You wouldn't see this with MD schools. An Albany Medical College student is never going to think that they are superior to someone at Johns Hopkins...
That's bc the ranking system has been ingrained in that community. This is not the case in the osteopathic medical community.
USNews adds DO schools in for spice, but does a piss-poor job of actually comparing them amongst each other. WVSOM ranks 49th in primary care... what does that f-ing mean!? It means they graduate more primary care docs and that they give you early clinical experience.
PCOM isn't ranked by USNews.. does that mean that WVSOM is better? I don't think that's the case at all.
Although a case can be made that the current lack of ranking is positive bc it discourages competition, I think that it does a disservice to premed students wanting to gain a thorough comparative analysis.
Some things that we need a comparative analysis of:
1) Professor Quality
2) COMLEX/USMLE pass rate (yes, BOTH bc a huge percentage of DOs go into allo residencies..)
3) Curriculum
4) Clinical Rotation sites
5) Matchlist
5) % Graduates entering primary care
6) % Graduates specializing
7) Admissions data (MCAT, GPA)
8) Student life
9) Facilities
10) [insert something i missed here]
These things need to be QUANTIFIED in some manner so that an OBJECTIVE measure is possible. Until this happens, there is absolutely no way to give a resolute ranking system.
