- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
- Messages
- 8,026
- Reaction score
- 4,154
Anyone want to discuss salary/income?
Same, but about $289k. $15k additional annual bonus for not sucking. Projected to hit $312k in 2024 per the VA. Low cost of living area. I'm probably going to request another raise soon, which I do every couple of years in addition to scheduled raises. Will probably get something based on past results. They have difficulty recruiting.Federal job, 40 hours/week, 4x10. Make about 275k doing this. Much of what I do is addiction. Sometimes it is not too bad but it is frequently a headache. Federal benefits but they don't make up for it.
My salary is listed online but about 3 years out of date.VA and all federal/California state salaries are totally public and online (wish private employers were the same). Starts about $250k out of residency in non-Bay Area NorCal. Can go up about $20k from there depending on experience.
Yikes that's low. Are the jobs fairly cush with throughput?VA and all federal/California state salaries are totally public and online (wish private employers were the same). Starts about $250k out of residency in non-Bay Area NorCal. Can go up about $20k from there depending on experience.
I have found a possible way to bill for a 99215 while not spending a full hour with a patient. What it is involved using a neuropsych analysis program where the patient comes to the office early, spends about 20-30 minutes during the testing that my assistant can help the patient with on directions, that software provides very good neuropsych testing, and I can then bill a 99215. The company sells this as a selling angle and I've been told it offers very good clinical results.
Whopper are you doing any forensic work in said private practice?My private practice brings in about $500K a year gross. That's with me working 4.5 days a week 8:30 to 5 PM. About 25% of that goes into expenses such as the rent, staff etc. So when all is said and done that brings home about $375K/year.
I make another $120K a year being a doctor in an addiction clinic. I only work there about 4 hours a week in-person but I need to be available for phone consultations with NPs. This amounts to about 10 hours a week but I can often times squeeze this in between patients, lunch or after work.
The last few years made about 25%/year on the stock market with my retirement account and personal money put into an Ameritrade account. So that usually brought in at least another $100K a year but because it was for retirement I wouldn't touch it. This year however I'm expecting quite a sizeable loss there. That's okay. This is about the long-term. They say about 8% on average when all is said and done is good and I'm ahead of that so I'm okay.
I think it turns out the quality of the job is very VA VISN specific. And the $ discussion is why I think this is a great topic. The published numbers don't give you a good sense of what we should actually make. There are part-timers, people doing locums and not for the full year, etc. I am sure there is a published distribution out there although I can't recall having seen a good one. I think psychiatrists working full-time and putting any effort/thought into it are making much more.Yes, VA jobs are cush. And $250k is not low. It's the national average and does not include the excellent VA benefits. $300k is CA average, but that's heavily weighted by the extremely high costs of living in the Bay Area and Los Angeles where the VA salaries would be closer to that. VA salaries are not negotiable, but they are all adjusted roughly every 3 years during a formal local market pay analysis.
medscape physician report is what I use+ doximity was working on a project where psychiatrists report their earnings and what region that actually had a lot of responses and seemed pretty accurate. National average probably closer to 270-280k now.I think it turns out the quality of the job is very VA VISN specific. And the $ discussion is why I think this is a great topic. The published numbers don't give you a good sense of what we should actually make. There are part-timers, people doing locums and not for the full year, etc. I am sure there is a published distribution out there although I can't recall having seen a good one. I think psychiatrists working full-time and putting any effort/thought into it are making much more.
I'd be dead in a month lol. But I just don't have much stamina in general.Trying to predict my salary when I finish residency next year. Plan to do pp and pick up some crisis unit shifts at 225/hr. For pp it would appear private reimbursement is in the 130 range for a 99214 in my area. With 50% add on therapy codes and seeing 20 patients a day that should translate to ~150*20 =3k/day. Do this 4 days a week x 46 weeks a year for ~550k. Less 15% overhead and it comes out to 470k/year. Does this napkin math seem reasonable to you guys?
Variables you need to consider:Trying to predict my salary when I finish residency next year. Plan to do pp and pick up some crisis unit shifts at 225/hr. For pp it would appear private reimbursement is in the 130 range for a 99214 in my area. With 50% add on therapy codes and seeing 20 patients a day that should translate to ~150*20 =3k/day. Do this 4 days a week x 46 weeks a year for ~550k. Less 15% overhead and it comes out to 470k/year. Does this napkin math seem reasonable to you guys?
Solid napkin math.Trying to predict my salary when I finish residency next year. Plan to do pp and pick up some crisis unit shifts at 225/hr. For pp it would appear private reimbursement is in the 130 range for a 99214 in my area. With 50% add on therapy codes and seeing 20 patients a day that should translate to ~150*20 =3k/day. Do this 4 days a week x 46 weeks a year for ~550k. Less 15% overhead and it comes out to 470k/year. Does this napkin math seem reasonable to you guys?
Solid napkin math.
But lets bump it into chinete, thick paper plate, level math.
$150*15pts (no shows)*46w =414K Gross
414k *0.65 (losing 35% to overhead) =$270K Net
270K - retirement, health insurance, taxes etc = $172K post taxes in your pocket
And of course as RJS alludes to, you don't know the rate of growth, and how long it will take to get this full point.
Variables you need to consider:
- 4 days of 20 patients/day = 80 patients/week…pretty slim chance you hit that consistently within your first year
- 20 psych clinic pts/day isn’t sustainable for most people and will lead to burnout - I’d think about longevity in the PP setting vs maximizing income your first few years (unless your plan is to cut back later on)
Mentors in my area indicate I'd fill within 3-4 months taking private insurance. Does this not seem realistic?
From my experience there is a balance between being full with med management and psychotherapy patients. A therapy patient you see every 1-2 weeks has a higher show/stability rate than q1-3 med mgmt patient. The latter often reschedule or fall-off.So “full” doesn’t mean your schedule is completely full with followups. Also, think about how many intakes you’d have to do a day to get there.
Ex. 40 patient contact hours a week (what it looks like you’re trying to do lol). 80 followups a week. 4 week followups= 320 patients to be “full”. Realistically people are not gonna want to come back every 4 weeks if they’re pretty stable. So say maybe q4-8 weeks as you start getting ramped up and titrating meds (q3+ months is typical for stable patients). Now you’re looking at more like 320-640 patients to be “full”. Then you have to account for people who stop following up, no shows, etc (people still late cancel and no show with no show fees, people get sick, etc).
Seeing 40 new patients a week initially is gonna burn you to a crisp. I’d be careful about ramping up tooo quickly at the expense of patient selection and longevity.
Agree with what @calvnandhobbs68 said! I started in a busy market with plenty of demand ~9 months ago (was also told "you'll be full in 3-4 months") and while that held to be true, most of my days currently are 1-2 news + 6-9 follow-ups (I do 30 min follow-ups, 90 min news). I'll have maybe 1 day/week at this point of all follow-ups.Mentors in my area indicate I'd fill within 3-4 months taking private insurance. Does this not seem realistic?
From my experience,
From my experience there is a balance between being full with med management and psychotherapy patients. A therapy patient you see every 1-2 weeks has a higher show/stability rate than q1-3 med mgmt patient. The latter often reschedule or fall-off.
A caveat to this is someone who starts in therapy who graduates to med mgmt. This makes up a bulk of my panel. People OK with 30 min longer follow ups who stay bc of the positive expectancy created / alliance built earlier in their phase of illness.
So, although I do a large chunk of 45-min appointments (where with 30 min I’d make more), I can actually produce a week that you’re looking at (60ish patient encounters, “full” back-to-back, of 45 and 30 min appointments). It also helps to bet flexibility with scheduling; I allow all my patients the ability to self-schedule in their patient portal.
Also, though therapy is more clinically/emotionally “hard,” these patients (bc of follow frequency) are less administratively “hard” (lower total pt panel, less apt to request things outside of appointments).
Thanks all who have contributed.
There are a lot of salary threads but I feel like this one is really letting us (residents and med students) "look under the hood" as to what comes along with the numbers being thrown around. From what I am gathering I am getting a sense that when I start at the PP that I am currently courting (one year of residency left), I should expect to collect ~300k? if I'm doing 5 days a week, with a healthy mix of MM and therapy . I think I had gotten myself excited when crunching the numbers that a 99214+99083 2x every hour (expecting to see 12-16ppd) would be the panacea and I could bill upwards of 500-600k however I'm getting a sense that this is not super reasonable (again thanks for letting me look under the hood).
Having searched the forum before I was thinking I was going to be rather aggressive by requesting a 75/25 split, however it looks like above someone is doing 80/20 and 85/15, are these unicorns or is this the norm for a 1099 (recognizing its location/market dependent).
Ive also been told I would probably "fill" in about 2 or 3 months but the above mention of what type of volume would be required to make that truly happen makes a lot of sense. My thought is I will probably do a tele gig for the first few months 10-20hr a week and then slowly phase that out as the PP picks up steam.
If yall are comfortable be curious to see the comparison between whoppers practice and calvinandhobs practice's, given both are putting in 4.5 days and Calivnandhobs is estimating low 300's and whopper is estimating ~500. Is it that calvinand hobs is taking the 30-45min "hits" that were mentioned above? I would be surprised if that made that big of a difference.
So much this! I see this in new grads so much. Which I guess I'm the outlier? Money is important. But whenever there is something offered that pays very high, it makes me very suspicious no matter how good the offer looks. There's a reason I decided to not join the local big boxes. Although they need us more than we need them, longevity would be an issue. The culture, quality of life and especially patient selection. There's another aspect to this career that is hard to put a monetary value on. Many young grads jump at the money for various reasons, I understand. Now we're several years out and the burn out is obvious while I'm content. Especially especially the patient selection. I can't imagine day after day going through multiple arguments about benzos, stims, wacky ketamine referrals, severe axis II, and all sorts of...whatever. My colleague is working with an emotionally draining patient who did atrocious things to a kitten and now the family is demanding she give him a diagnosis he does not have when he's clearly antisocial.I’d be careful about ramping up tooo quickly at the expense of patient selection and longevity.
The most lucrative model includes patients who are desperate to see you be it some sort of acuity, strong therapeutic relationship, drug seeking, any reason. And you bill higher complexity med checks, back to back. The other end of the spectrum is longer visits that may have less pay per minute. There are some cash models that can be worked to offset this. But I'll be transparent. It would take me forever to build a cash only practice. I actually prefer not to for various reasons but one is that I think it affects the dynamic and makes it feel more salesy versus having insurance be a healthy boundary. Local colleagues who are thinking of making their own PP considered cash only and I don't recommend it. That was how one colleague started and after a couple years, she's decided to sign on with one insurance panel and will see how it goes. Now in this region if you start as a PP solo practitioner, it seems to have gotten harder to get paneled. This same colleague was denied being paneled on some of the higher paying ones unless she accepted Medicaid which was not the case when I started. Although I wonder if it makes a difference since I was already seeing patients under a different entity and some insurance companies worry about their members losing continuity of care. If you have good insurance rates and because psychiatrists are so desperately needed, it's still reasonably attainable, you can easily get $150s-$160s for 99213+90833. Some insurances pay $200s for that and with good networking, you can find the employers that use these insurances and BOOM you got a powerful multiplier. Now with the changes in billing, we can easily hit 99214. But yes, that sliver of time makes a DIFFERENCE. Lets say you miss out on a 99213+90833 each day at 5 days a week. In a 48 week work year that's at least $36000. That's why attendance policies are so important.Is it that calvinand hobs is taking the 30-45min "hits" that were mentioned above? I would be surprised if that made that big of a difference.
Which company is offering this?Reason why I asked is cause I'm wondering if there's some angle I haven't cracked that'd make more money but still remain clinically appropriate.
I have found a possible way to bill for a 99215 while not spending a full hour with a patient. What it is involved using a neuropsych analysis program where the patient comes to the office early, spends about 20-30 minutes during the testing that my assistant can help the patient with on directions, that software provides very good neuropsych testing, and I can then bill a 99215. The company sells this as a selling angle and I've been told it offers very good clinical results.
The software is thousands of dollars and is a subscription only. I'm still considering it and haven't committed to it yet.
Around 600K per year. Mix of inpatient work, clinical trials, and outpatient consulting work.
Are your getting paid RVUs for supervising the np?Inpatient. Cover 22 bed unit, and see floor .