.....he clearly is deep in the q universe if he thinks Fauci is responsible for the creation of covid 19....
That isn't quit what he was saying. He is saying two things.
#1. He said Fauci funded gain of function research which is 100% accurate. It’s a fascinating story and worth exploring if interested. Obama had stopped all of this type of research and when Trump came into office, Fauci used his magic to get him to allow the continued funding of this type of research. Fauci denies it and says it wasn’t gain of function, but holy crap, it clearly was. Regardless, the money went to fund whatever research the Wuhan lab was doing. Call it boogly-boo research, it doesn't matter. And he lied about it. That is the key part.
If interested, the full deposition from the lawsuit against him just dropped recently. It is over 500 pages long. He said "I don't recall" 147 times on issues that he was heavily involved in. The most striking and really funny thing, is he says he is barely aware of the research that is in question (the funded part from NIH), yet at other times, he emphatically says that there is NO WAY the NIH funded research could have sparked the virus. And just in case you aren't reading too closely as I am often times too wordy - those are two statements that are 100% contradictory and impossible.
Here is a quote from the Attorney General after the deposition took place.
“Fauci’s recent deposition only confirmed what we already knew: federal bureaucrats in collusion with social media companies want to control not only what you think, but especially what you say,” said
Attorney General Landry. “During no time in human history was this more obvious than during the COVID-19 crisis where social engineering tactics were used against the American public, not to limit your exposure to a virus, but to limit your exposure to information that did not fit within a government sanctioned narrative.”
#2: Gain of function research is a very likely cause of the creation of the COVID-19 virus. Is it known for a fact this is the case? No it isn’t. But it’s the leading plausible hypothesis.