UC schools and non-residents

Discussion in 'Pre-Medical - MD' started by JulianCrane, May 19, 2002.

  1. JulianCrane

    JulianCrane The Power of Intention

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2001
    Messages:
    695
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am not a resident of California, yet I am interested in applying to UCLA and UC San Francisco. Would it be worth it to spend the money to apply to these schools, or do I have virtually no chance since I am a non-resident?
     
  2. Thread continues after this sponsor message. SDN Members do not see this ad.

  3. HanSolo

    HanSolo Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2002
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sure you have a chance, however big that chance is really dependent on other factors, i.e your MCAT scores, GPA, and ECs and LORs. In my opinion you need to have a mid to hi 30s in the MCAT, >3.7 GPA, exceptional ECs and LORs in order to be competitive for admission to UCLA and UCSF as a non-resident applicant.
     
  4. none

    none 1K Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2001
    Messages:
    1,903
    Likes Received:
    5
    UCLA and SF are the UCs to go for if you're out of state. I think they take roughly 40% out of state whereas SD takes 5%. Irvine and Davis take virtually 0.
     
  5. pocwana

    pocwana MD/MBA candidate c/o 2008

    Joined:
    May 11, 2002
    Messages:
    1,128
    Likes Received:
    3
    Status:
    Medical Student
    Hi,
    Recently I talked to two Med2's from UCLA. Both were from out of state. One had a GPA of 3.96 undergrad and 33 MCAT. He said his school wasn't tough, though. The other was 3.8 w/35 MCAT. I don't know any of their EC's or anything else, but they did it. If you've got pretty good stats and ECs and of course the total package, you should go for it.
     

Share This Page