- Joined
- Jul 20, 2005
- Messages
- 1,436
- Reaction score
- 4
damn if i had known that ucla was not gonna let late interviewees know until after may 15th, i wouldnt have even bothered interviewing there. i have enough of a difficult decision on my hands with the other schools ive been accepted at, and i obviously need to let them know by may 15th what im doing. it's annoying bc the admissions office never gives straight up answers. i remember asking them whether interviewing late would hurt my chances and they said no, not at all. maybe interviewing late doesnt accept your chances overall (meaning like in being accepted sometime in the summer), but it certainly hurts your chances of being accepted before may 15th.
damn if i had known that ucla was not gonna let late interviewees know until after may 15th, i wouldnt have even bothered interviewing there. i have enough of a difficult decision on my hands with the other schools ive been accepted at, and i obviously need to let them know by may 15th what im doing. it's annoying bc the admissions office never gives straight up answers. i remember asking them whether interviewing late would hurt my chances and they said no, not at all. maybe interviewing late doesnt accept your chances overall (meaning like in being accepted sometime in the summer), but it certainly hurts your chances of being accepted before may 15th.
If it's not worth the wait just withdraw your application... I certainly wouldn't mind. I had to wait four months for my decision, as did/do a lot of other people.
Sorry, I don't mean to be rude, but if you wouldn't have even interviewed there I really think you should withdraw.
I think at this point, this means we won't be getting a decision anytime soon but that we could potentially be better off than people already on the waitlist since I assume our applications will be the first ones looked at when they look to fill the class after May 15th. Obviously, if they've only accepted 130 people up until this point, they'll need to accept at least 75-100 more eventually to fill the class.
.Hi guys!
Got on the wl a while ago, called the office recently and they told me I should be expecting a letter in 1-2 weeks..
.😕Any idea whats in the mail?????????????????????????????????😕.
or, they thought you were still waiting for your decision letter and that's their programmed response haha.
.Hi guys!.
.Got on the wl a while ago, called the office recently and they told me I should be expecting a letter in 1-2 weeks..
.😕Any idea whats in the mail?????????????????????????????????😕.
ok i just called
no suprise but we will all hear something within the next 2 weeks, by may 15, for those of us that have no notice whatsoever
translation: we will hear something by thanksgiving
are we sure that UCLA doesn't overaccept? how is that possible?
and does anybody know roughly how many OOS were at 2nd look?
i can confirm that this is a fact. i was told so by dr. levey, the vice chancellor, at second look. this is why so many people usually get in off the WL for all of the ucla programs (drew, geffen, ucr, and now prime) each year.
also, there were a lot of students who were on the fence about ucla and another school (mostly either ucsf, wash u, or hopkins from asking around). so i wouldn't be surprised if there was a little WL movement before may 15, and a crap ton of movement just after may 15.
ACCEPTED
pntgrd, interviewed 1/26/08, Regular M.D., accepted February
WAITLISTED
guitarologist, interviewed 12/04/07, Regular M.D., waitlisted 3/18
HOLD
WITHDREW
NO NEWS
phomp, interviewed 2/22/08, regular md...no news...
neurofreak, interviewed 2/5/08, regular md, no news...still hoping
jameshgo, interviewed 3/6/08 regular md, no news...
Hi LadyDoc,
So... UCSF? CONGRATS!!! It must have been a very difficult decision, but you can't go wrong with any of your choices. May I know what made you decide in the end? Again, you've done amazingly and best of luck...
I called the admissions office.... told ....i forgot his name....the English guy that I interviewed 03/18. Before I could say more he said the letters will be mailed before May 15th.
I don't know why we even bother anymore. No matter what they say, I'm not sure I can trust them.
FWIW, I interviewed early April and my interviewer was a pretty honest dude. He told me two more committee meeting would take place and then acceptances, waitlists, and rejections would be doled out. And then he guaranteed to me that I would hear something before May 15th. And then he told me where I should go to school if I didn't get into UCLA. He was quite talkative.
So I went into the admissions office today and talked to Lily Fobert (I was glad, too, because I'm pretty sure the british guy is sick of me) and asked about app statuses. She said I would probably hear by May 15 (probably??!!). I also asked if there was any way to see if a decision has been made on my file, and she said "no, we would have sent you a letter because we try to get the decisions out asap". Which is, I think, not true because they obviously send letters in bunches and I doubt that all applications are decided upon the day before.
Anyway, that's my update.
So I went into the admissions office today and talked to Lily Fobert (I was glad, too, because I'm pretty sure the british guy is sick of me) and asked about app statuses. She said I would probably hear by May 15 (probably??!!). I also asked if there was any way to see if a decision has been made on my file, and she said "no, we would have sent you a letter because we try to get the decisions out asap". Which is, I think, not true because they obviously send letters in bunches and I doubt that all applications are decided upon the day before.
Anyway, that's my update.
So I went into the admissions office today and talked to Lily Fobert (I was glad, too, because I'm pretty sure the british guy is sick of me) and asked about app statuses. She said I would probably hear by May 15 (probably??!!). I also asked if there was any way to see if a decision has been made on my file, and she said "no, we would have sent you a letter because we try to get the decisions out asap". Which is, I think, not true because they obviously send letters in bunches and I doubt that all applications are decided upon the day before.
Anyway, that's my update.
Thanks for the info nawla18! Lili Fobert is the director of admissions, so she's about as straight to the source you can get for answers.
no prob. do you guys think that they have to send letters by monday at the latest to ensure that we would hear by 5/15? I kinda think (and hope) so