Video: ACGME proposed changes for 2028

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Mr.Smile12

Admissions advisor
Staff member
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Sharing without endorsement for discussion



AI-generated summary:
The ACGME proposal would cut common residency program requirements by 43% and could take effect on July 1, 2028. Rachel argues that fewer rules may give residency programs too much control over schedules and resident working conditions.

The proposal keeps the 80-hour workweek limit but averages it across four weeks within each rotation, rather than across different rotations. Rachel sees this as a possible improvement because demanding rotations could no longer be balanced against lighter ones.

The required rest after a 24-hour shift would fall from 14 hours to 12. Rachel argues that commuting, eating, showering, family responsibilities, and other tasks leave residents with far less actual sleep, making the change primarily a scheduling benefit for programs.

The proposal removes the recommendation for eight hours of rest between shifts and eliminates the every-third-night call limit. Rachel considers the removal of the rest recommendation especially unsafe, even though the ACGME says current rules are difficult to reconcile with the 80-hour limit.

Residents could stay up to four additional hours after a 24-hour shift for patient safety or continuity of care, at their own initiative. The proposal also keeps at least one 24-hour day off per week, averaged within a single rotation.

Rachel identifies several positive changes: programs would need private lactation spaces with refrigerators without requiring residents to make up the time, and they would need policies addressing pregnancy, schedule changes, and occupational exposures.

She argues that residency should provide demanding clinical training without treating residents as easily movable scheduling units or measuring medical readiness by how much suffering they can tolerate. She supports learning to function during difficult situations but says rest and personal well-being must remain part of training.

The proposal was open for public comments until October 22, 2026. Rachel encourages residents and others to submit specific, constructive experiences about what works and fails in current residency training rather than simply saying that residency is difficult.
 
I don't see this as a win for residents, I'm surprised the ACGME is considering this change.

Over 20 years ago, in NYC, they had the 80 hour week worked out (HHC). It was (all caps) AVERAGED OVER FOUR WEEKS. This encouraged honest reporting, since, q4 call would put one over 90 one week, and high 50s the next.
There's no change from the current rules to these new proposed rules about this. Hours are still averageable over 4 weeks. The only difference is that you can't average two different rotations -- in the current rules, I could make 2 weeks of night float with 12 fourteen hour shifts, followed by 2 weeks of elective. The night float would be 84 hours per week, but when averaged with the elective would come to less than 80. With these new proposed rules, if I divide a 4 week bleck into two 2 week blocks, each of the 2 week blocks needs to be less than 80 hours / week (averaged over the 2 weeks). This is a good change for residents

The limit on q3 is not really needed. q2 24 hour call would be 7 calls in 2 weeks. 7 * 24 = 168 / 2 = 84 hours per week. With the above new rule change, programs can't have q2 call. q3 call with 10 hour days on the middle day still just barely fit (but not if people stay at all on their post call days).

The time off after shifts used to be a scheduling problem, because back when they started it was 14 hours after a 24 (not an issue) and 10 hours off after a 12 hour shift. That becomes a problem when creating a day/night shift situation. You can create two 12 hour shifts and it works fine -- but often it's better to have a 10 hour day shift and a 14 hour night shift. A 10 hour off after a 14 hour night shift leaves no wiggle time. But the rules now are 8 hours off after a long shift, so it's no problem.

I don't see why they are shortening the time off after a 24. If you work 8A to 8A, you should not come back until the next AM at the earliest IMHO. Shortening this to 12 would theoretically allow a resident to return at 8PM after an 8A - 8A shift -- and that's nuts. I have no idea why they want to shorten this, and whether it will have any impacts on schedules (I'm sure someone will do something abusive).

The very sad miss is outlawing the DOMA - Day Off My A**. 24 hour shift 8A - 8A. Come back the next day at 8A. That's 24 hours off -- that's your day off. That is completely ridic and unacceptable in my view -- I removed all 24 hour call a long time ago, but even after a NF shift, that next day I consider a "post call" shift (if not working that night) and does not count towards the 4 days off per block.