Walgreens in AZ refusing to xfer CIV before first fill?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Lnsean said:
I told you, i followed walgreen's interpretation. Did you not read? I'm not qualified to make the interpretation on my own. I followed the memo and thought it made sense and I agreed with the legal counsel.
Click to expand...

When you were in school how did you interpret it?

This isn't a hard question.
Members don't see this ad.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
owlegrad said:
No wonder you want the DEA to clarify this again you have to be told the same thing 12 times before you get it.
Click to expand...

It's not me...it just the top 4 chains in the business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Lnsean said:
Easy...back then it was legal.
Click to expand...

Thank you, you like everyone else we're a bright student and read the law correctly. A law that has since not changed and has also been reaffirmed that it hasn't changed.

That's it for me folks. Thread over:banana::hello::claps::bow::bow:+pity++pity+
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
wagrxm2000 said:
Thank you, you like everyone else we're a bright student and read the law correctly. A law that has since not changed and has also been reaffirmed that it hasn't changed.

That's it for me folks. Thread over:banana::hello::claps::bow::bow:+pity++pity+
Click to expand...

is that how people win arguments in middle school? you just dismiss the situation. I mean it's ongoing..lol....this is literally affecting your practice. it's not something you can just dismiss like that...unfortunately.
 
owlegrad said:
I knew it!!!!

The funny part to me is, I actually agreed with give the cards for ‘customer satisfaction’ reasons. So in that case Walgreens and I were both wrong.
Click to expand...
That's why they won;t ask me to do it. They got in trouble.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
wagrxm2000 said:
Thank you, you like everyone else we're a bright student and read the law correctly. A law that has since not changed and has also been reaffirmed that it hasn't changed.

That's it for me folks. Thread over:banana::hello::claps::bow::bow:+pity++pity+
Click to expand...


But why won’t the DEA issue a new notice every few years reaffirming that it is legal? Or just change the law to be more clear????
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Lnsean said:
is that how people win arguments in middle school? you just dismiss the situation. I mean it's ongoing..lol....this is literally affecting your practice. it's not something you can just dismiss like that...unfortunately.
Click to expand...
Thread over:highfive::hardy::soexcited::thumbup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
owlegrad said:
But why won’t the DEA issue a new notice every few years reaffirming that it is legal? Or just change the law to be more clear????
Click to expand...

exactly this. thank you owle...knew we were on the same page. bff
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
CetiAlphaFive said:
"
They did it before and that's how i know they would not do it now."

-LnSosoo
Click to expand...

You shouldn’t spread misinformation, corporate lawyers are never wrong. Interpretations just change over time. Back then everyone was doing it and it was the industry standard so it was legal. Then they got fined and now it’s not industry standard so it’s illegal.

I think I’m catching on to how this works.
 
Lnsean said:
is that how people win arguments in middle school? you just dismiss the situation. I mean it's ongoing..lol....this is literally affecting your practice. it's not something you can just dismiss like that...unfortunately.
Click to expand...

TOP KEK.

we need a highlight reel of your posts from this thread
 
CetiAlphaFive said:
TOP KEK.

we need a highlight reel of your posts from this thread
Click to expand...

Same for you...for all of us really. I mean you were talking about committing fraud and stuff to prove your point. I respect a man like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
CetiAlphaFive said:
TOP KEK.

we need a highlight reel of your posts from this thread
Click to expand...

**** that, I want a highlight of MY posts from this thread. Maybe it’s just the tiredness talking but I feel like I’m on a roll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Lnsean said:
lmao it's almost like i'm arguing with a 5 year old...running away doesnt mean it's over
Click to expand...
There's nothing else to say.

I had one of the top professors out there. He was the go to man for many cases. There is zero chance he interpreted this wrong.

You've now agreed you too interpreted it this way which tells me another law professor saw it this way. Every single professor sees it this way.

The dea has stated nothing has changed you may transfer.

There is nothing else to argue.

Thread over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Lnsean said:
Same for you...for all of us really. I mean you were talking about committing fraud and stuff to prove your point. I respect a man like that.
Click to expand...

LOL.

Has anyone ever taken you into a room and shown you two dolls?

Did one doll hide a ball inside of a tiny box while the other wasn't looking?

Did they ask you where the other doll would think the ball would be?
 
CetiAlphaFive said:
LOL.

Has anyone ever taken you into a room and shown you two dolls?

Did one doll hide a ball inside of a tiny box while the other wasn't looking?

Did they ask you where the other doll would think the ball would be?
Click to expand...

What that was a complement dude. I never argued with a man that was willing to break the law for me.
 
wagrxm2000 said:
There's nothing else to say.

I had one of the top professors out there. He was the go to man for many cases. There is zero chance he interpreted this wrong.

You've now agreed you too interpreted it this way which tells me another law professor saw it this way. Every single professor sees it this way.

The dea has stated nothing has changed you may transfer.

There is nothing else to argue.

Thread over.
Click to expand...

Oh my god..you are so cute. I thought you ran away from this thread. Just leave the debating to the big boys okay?
 
wagrxm2000 said:
There's nothing else to say.
I had one of the top professors out there. He was the go to man for many cases. There is zero chance he interpreted this wrong.
You've now agreed you too interpreted it this way which tells me another law professor saw it this way. Every single professor sees it this way.
The dea has stated nothing has changed you may transfer.
There is nothing else to argue.
Thread over.
Click to expand...

I wonder if Cacciatore has posted his opinion on this **** show anywhere or in a lecture.

I need to ask someone.
 
"you may transfer"

yet no one will...it's a shame really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Lnsean said:
Oh my god..you are so cute. I thought you ran away from this thread. Just leave the debating to the big boys okay?
Click to expand...

Oh young man, you have much to learn.
 
wagrxm2000 said:
There's nothing else to say.

I had one of the top professors out there. He was the go to man for many cases. There is zero chance he interpreted this wrong.

You've now agreed you too interpreted it this way which tells me another law professor saw it this way. Every single professor sees it this way.

The dea has stated nothing has changed you may transfer.

There is nothing else to argue.

Thread over.
Click to expand...

But what do words like forward and information even mean, really?

Also what does it mean for a policy “not to change”? Does that mean it is allowed or isn’t?
 
Lnsean said:
"you may transfer"

yet no one will...it's a shame really.
Click to expand...

This is just too funny, no one will because they care about their job more then transferring. You don't think Walgreens wouldn't fire someone now?
 
owlegrad said:
But what do words like forward and information even mean, really?
Click to expand...

come on dude...its pretty easy...where else have you used "forward" in your daily life....EMAILS...duhhh..when you forward an email..do you call the person up and dictate its content to them verbally? no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
wagrxm2000 said:
This is just too funny, no one will because they care about their job more then transferring. You don't think Walgreens wouldn't fire someone now?
Click to expand...

No one is gonna catch you. Do it. Proof me wrong.
 
Lnsean said:
No one is gonna catch you. Do it. Proof me wrong.
Click to expand...

You want me to get myself fired?

You seriously think pharmacists now all think it's illegal and that's why they don't do it?

You suck at trolling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Lnsean said:
come on dude...its pretty easy...where else have you used "forward" in your daily life....EMAILS...duhhh..when you forward an email..do you call the person up and dictate its content to them verbally? no.
Click to expand...

Oddly enough when people ask me to transfer something to them I don’t call them and dictate it to them verbally. It’s almost like words have a different meaning in the Pharmacy world.
 
owlegrad said:
I don’t get the reference. Is this a hypothetical?
Click to expand...

He's a bit of a weirdo. Ann's probably his pet dog. He's the type that would give regular human names to animals. Other choices were: Peter, Ryan, and Bruce.
 
owlegrad said:
Oddly enough when people ask me to transfer something to them I don’t call them and dictate it to them verbally. It’s almost like words have a different meaning in the Pharmacy world.
Click to expand...

Yea...crazy...almost like they don't tell you what they mean almost...almost vague in a sense. I mean you're the lawyer here...if you don't know...I certainly wouldn't
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
owlegrad said:
I don’t know about that he’s kept me on the line for the last seven pages. LOL
Click to expand...

Let me rephrase, you suck at debating.

He seriously just makes statements and acts like they are true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Lnsean said:
Yea...crazy...almost like they don't tell you what they mean almost...almost vague in a sense. I mean you're the lawyer here...if you don't know...I certainly wouldn't
Click to expand...

Yeah it’s so weird. I have always done transfers a certain way and I’m told that the policy hasn’t changed that must mean I can’t do it anymore and that I was always wrong, except everyone did it that way so it was legal.

So vague.
 
owlegrad said:
Yeah it’s so weird. I have always done transfers a certain way and I’m told that the policy hasn’t changed that must mean I can’t do it anymore. So vague.
Click to expand...

policies haven't changed but what does forward mean?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Lnsean said:
this is coming from a guy who runs away from an online thread
Click to expand...

It's because you've been proven wrong so many times but you are so hardheaded you refuse to admit when you're wrong.
 
wagrxm2000 said:
It's because you've been proven wrong so many times but you are so hardheaded you refuse to admit when you're wrong.
Click to expand...

Huh? you prove people wrong by running away and throwing a tantrum?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Next unread thread

Similar threads

P
Walgreens rxom
Replies
13
Views
1K
CetiAlphaFive
CetiAlphaFive
P
Walgreens walkout
Replies
16
Views
1K
RxPreceptor
RxPreceptor
P
Walgreens seeks provider status for pharmacists: CEO
Replies
3
Views
592
projektreverb
P
C
Robbery at North Texas Walgreens
Replies
0
Views
570
Chrish
C
R
I actually witnessed a dumpster fire at Walgreens today!
Replies
6
Views
1K
RxPreceptor
RxPreceptor
Top